Judy Trombetta
DemocraticQ1 PFAS chemicals are widely used in consumer products but have raised health concerns due to their persistence in the environment and humans, and some Pennsylvanian legislators are considering restrictions on its use, such as in House Bill 2145. Should Pennsylvania restrict PFAS in consumer products? What scientific evidence would you use to inform your decision?
Yes, Pennsylvania should take action to restrict the use of PFAS chemicals in consumer products. As policymakers, we have a responsibility to protect Pennsylvanians from harmful exposures while ensuring decisions are guided by sound science and practical implementation.
In making decisions about PFAS regulation, I would rely on the best available scientific evidence, including research from public health agencies, environmental scientists, toxicologists, and regulatory bodies regarding the health impacts of PFAS exposure. I would also consider data on exposure levels, environmental contamination, and the effectiveness of available alternatives.
KEYWORDS: Public Health; Environmental Protection; Evidence-Based Research
Q2 Measles vaccination rates in Pennsylvania have declined in recent years, from 95.5% in 2020 to 92.5% in 2025. At the same time, measles outbreaks have emerged across the state, with 62 confirmed cases in PA in 2026. As a policymaker, how do you approach engaging with communities that have concerns that center on infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety, and what policies, if any, would you support related to these issues?
As a policymaker, I believe it is essential to approach concerns about infectious diseases and vaccine safety with respect, empathy, and a commitment to sharing accurate, science-based information. Public trust is critical, and we need to engage communities through open conversations, accessible information, and partnerships with trusted local healthcare providers, schools, and community leaders.
At the same time, policymakers have a responsibility to protect public health and prevent the spread of serious and preventable diseases. I support policies that promote access to vaccines, strengthen public health education, and ensure families have the information and resources they need to make informed decisions. I also believe we must continue to listen to concerns, address misinformation with facts, and make sure communities understand the safety and effectiveness of recommended vaccines.
KEYWORDS: Education; Partnership; Communication
Q3 There have been avian influenza outbreaks in Pennsylvania, with potential impacts on poultry and dairy operations, both industries that provide billions of dollars of economic value to the state. What policies, if any, do you support to strengthen the state’s preparedness and outbreak response? Are there specific strategies you would prioritize to protect farm workers, agricultural communities, and the broader public?
Pennsylvania’s agricultural industry is a critical part of our economy and our communities, and we must ensure we are prepared to respond quickly and effectively to threats like avian influenza. I support strengthening coordination between state agencies, farmers, veterinarians, public health officials, and local communities to improve preparedness, communication, and response efforts.
Protecting farm workers and agricultural communities must be a priority. I support ensuring that workers have access to appropriate training, protective equipment, and timely information about potential risks. We should also continue investing in surveillance, testing, and resources that help farmers identify and contain outbreaks while minimizing economic harm.
A strong response requires partnership. Farmers and agricultural professionals are on the front lines of protecting both their livelihoods and public health, and they should have a seat at the table when developing policies that impact their operations. By combining science-based strategies, strong communication, and support for our agricultural community, Pennsylvania can better protect workers, producers, and consumers.
KEYWORDS: Preparedness; Partnership; Education
Q4 Pennsylvania is the nation’s second-largest producer of natural gas and nuclear energy, as well as the third-largest producer of coal, per the Energy Information Administration. In contrast, PA currently ranks 45th in the country in terms of wind, solar, and hydropower energy production. How do you think these energy sources should be distributed across PA’s energy production portfolio, and what policies, if any, would you support to facilitate this?
While Pennsylvania has a strong history as an energy-producing state, there is a clear opportunity to diversify and expand our renewable energy portfolio. While natural gas, nuclear energy, and other traditional sources have played a significant role in our energy economy, I believe Pennsylvania should begin shifting toward a greater reliance on renewable energy sources, including wind, solar, and hydropower.
I am a strong proponent of renewable energy and believe we should be creating policies that incentivize its growth. Expanding renewable energy will help reduce pollution, protect public health, create good-paying jobs, and position Pennsylvania for the future. This includes supporting investments in solar and wind development, improving energy efficiency, modernizing our electric grid, and making it easier for communities, businesses, and residents to participate in the clean energy transition.
As we make this shift, we must ensure that our energy system remains reliable and affordable for Pennsylvania families and businesses. A responsible transition requires thoughtful planning, investment, and support for workers and communities impacted by changes in our energy economy. Pennsylvania has a significant opportunity to move toward a cleaner, more sustainable energy future while continuing to support economic growth across the Commonwealth.
KEYWORDS: Incentivize; Diversification; Expand Renewable
Q5 Pennsylvania has proposed more reporting, utility oversight, and zoning guidance for large data centers, along with shifting some generation, capacity, and reliability costs onto data center developers rather than ordinary ratepayers. How should the costs and benefits of large data center development be divided between developers and the public, and what requirements, if any, would you support on power, water, and public reporting before a project moves forward?
Large data centers represent both economic opportunities and significant infrastructure challenges, and Pennsylvania should approach their development thoughtfully. I believe we must carefully consider the potential health, environmental, energy, and resource impacts of these facilities, in addition to the financial costs. Companies that benefit from these projects should bear an appropriate share of the costs associated with the demands they place on our infrastructure, and those costs should not unfairly fall on ordinary ratepayers or taxpayers.
I am a strong believer in local government authority when it comes to data center development. Local elected officials are responsible for zoning and land use decisions, and they should have a meaningful voice in determining whether and how these projects move forward in their communities. Those closest to the residents impacted by development are often best positioned to understand local needs and concerns.
At the same time, the state has an important role in establishing standards around energy and water usage, environmental protections, and transparency requirements. I support strong public reporting and oversight to ensure developers are accountable for their impacts. Pennsylvania should encourage responsible innovation while protecting our communities, natural resources, and long-term quality of life.
KEYWORDS: Local Control; Strong Regulations; Environmental Protection