Staci Childs
DemocraticQ1 In June 2026, USDA confirmed New World screwworm in Texas livestock for the first time in decades; as of early July, dozens of infestations have been confirmed across South Texas (USDA APHIS , 2026). USDA estimates a full-scale outbreak comparable to past infestations could cost the regional economy billions of dollars (USDA APHIS). What policies, if any, would you support to respond to the current outbreak and improve Texas’s agricultural biosecurity (practices and safeguards that prevent pests and diseases from spreading through livestock populations), and what evidence or considerations would inform that approach?
When threats occur, the best response is to focus on prevention first, then rapid detection and coordination. There needs to be support for ranchers and wildlife officials on identifying and reporting suspected cases. Additionally, I would examine whether small or family-owned producers have adequate access to veterinary services. I believe there should be biosecurity and investing in prevention methods is where we can save money. My decisions would be informed by the Texas Animal Health Commission, veterinarians, researchers, and agricultural producers.
Q2 Texas is on track to become the nation’s leading data center market within the next three years (Bloom Energy, 2026). The state’s grid operator has more than doubled its 2030 forecast for data center power demand over the past year (ERCOT, 2025). Such growth brings economic opportunity while placing significant demands on water, land, and energy systems, raising questions about tax incentives, utility costs, and local community impacts. What policies, if any, would you support around water/energy allocation, tax incentives, or utility costs for data center development in Texas, and what evidence informs that position?
I believe any investments we make to innovate and profit should benefit the life of our communities. Working families should not have to struggle more to make room for large companies when they lack other basic investments. This is important to me when I think about communities like those in House District 131. Some neighborhoods have experienced years of underinvestment and continue to struggle to access fresh, affordable food. We should take creating health services as seriously as we take incentives to attract billion-dollar data centers. For data centers, I would like greater transparency around their electricity and water demands.
Q3 Texas faces flooding while simultaneously experiencing water scarcity driven by drought, groundwater depletion, and population growth (TWDB, 2024). Hundreds of Texas waterways are listed as impaired for bacteria, mercury, and other pollutants, threatening water quality for communities across the state (TCEQ, 2024). Agriculture is the largest consumer of the state’s groundwater, yet it is also well positioned to be a valuable partner in conservation efforts. What policies, if any, would you support to improve Texas’s water infrastructure, and what considerations would guide your approach to the state’s agricultural economy?
Ensuring the long-term sustainability of our water resources requires a strategy that acknowledges the paradox of severe flooding occurring alongside persistent drought and groundwater exhaustion. I advocate for robust investment in modernizing our aging wastewater systems and expanding flood mitigation efforts. Enhancing our water supply through conservation and reuse is essential for every community. Because the agricultural sector is vital to our economy and a primary consumer of water, I support collaborative cost-sharing and incentives that empower ranchers and farmers to implement efficient practices. For families in House District 131, my priority is ensuring that neighborhoods which have historically faced underinvestment finally receive their equitable share of infrastructure funding and reliable access to safe, clean water.
Q4 The Texas power grid continues to face strain from extreme heat and increasing demand, including from data centers. What policies, if any, would you support to improve grid reliability for Texas consumers and businesses?
Texans deserve to trust our electric grid during extreme heat and severe weather without worrying about skyrocketing utility bills. I’m excited to support initiatives that will strengthen our transmission infrastructure, uphold robust weatherization standards, and expand innovative energy storage and demand-response programs. As our population and economy thrive, we must ensure a diverse mix of reliable energy sources. Additionally, we must strategically plan for major new electricity users, like data centers, ensuring they contribute their fair share to infrastructure rather than placing the burden on residential customers and small businesses. I’m also committed to championing strong legislative oversight of ERCOT and the Public Utility Commission, as reliability, affordability, and accountability are key to a bright energy future for all Texans.
Q5 Texas universities and hospitals receive approximately $1.9 billion annually in NIH funding across 118 research sites, supporting tens of thousands of jobs and driving medical and scientific innovation (FASEB, 2025). NIH grants reimburse institutions for both direct research costs and indirect costs, the facilities, administration, and support infrastructure that make research possible. A 15% indirect cost cap proposed by NIH in 2025, currently blocked by federal courts, would sharply reduce this reimbursement below the rates Texas institutions have negotiated, cutting an estimated $300 million in annual support that institutions would need to absorb or backfill (Kamerlin & Elias, 2025). What policies, if any, would you support at the state or federal level to protect the long-term stability of Texas’s research infrastructure, and why?
Texas universities, hospitals, and research institutions are major economic engines that create jobs, train scientists and physicians, and produce discoveries that improve people’s lives. I would support protecting stable federal investment in NIH research and oppose arbitrary funding changes that fail to account for the legitimate costs of maintaining laboratories, facilities, equipment, cybersecurity, regulatory compliance, and the workforce necessary to conduct high-quality research. At the state level, I would also consider targeted measures to protect strategically important Texas research capacity when temporary federal disruptions threaten major projects or researchers. Texas has invested decades in becoming a leader in medicine, science, technology, and innovation, and protecting that research infrastructure is both an economic-development priority and an investment in our future.
Q6 Texas kindergartners’ measles vaccination rate fell to 93.24% in the 2024-2025 school year, a decline from prior years amid a national resurgence (Texas Department of State Health Services, 2025). That year, Texas recorded 762 confirmed measles cases, including the deaths of two unvaccinated school-age children, in the state’s largest outbreak since 1992 (Texas DSHS, 2025). Measles can cause serious complications: roughly 1 in 5 unvaccinated people who contract it are hospitalized, and it can lead to pneumonia, brain swelling, or death (CDC). As a policymaker, how do you approach engaging with communities that have concerns about infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety, and what policies, if any, would you support related to these issues, and why?
Public health policy must protect communities while also recognizing that trust cannot be built by dismissing people’s questions or concerns. I support evidence-based school vaccination requirements with appropriate medical exemptions, accessible vaccination services, and rapid public-health responses when outbreaks occur. At the same time, government needs to do a better job communicating with families through trusted physicians, schools, faith leaders, and community organizations, including providing information in the languages communities actually use. The measles outbreak demonstrated that vaccine-preventable diseases can still have serious consequences, particularly for children and vulnerable individuals. My approach would be to listen respectfully, provide transparent and scientifically accurate information, improve access to preventive care, and make decisions based on the best available medical evidence.
Q7 Scientific evidence is generated through the systematic testing and evaluation of ideas. It provides knowledge the helps us understand the world and predict the likely consequences of different choices, such policy making related to public health, energy, agriculture, and environmental regulation. What role, if any, should scientific evidence and expert input play in your policymaking process, and how would you evaluate competing or uncertain scientific claims when making policy decisions? What role, if any, should that process play when scientific consensus and public opinion diverge?
Scientific evidence and professional expertise are vital components of the policymaking process, particularly for complex issues like public health, energy, and agriculture. My approach involves examining the full body of evidence, prioritizing independently verified results that reflect broad consensus among researchers, while remaining mindful of potential biases. It is equally important to engage with families and local stakeholders whose lived experiences provide essential context that numbers alone might overlook. When expert consensus and public sentiment are at odds, our responsibility is to address those concerns through transparent communication without dismissing the underlying facts. Ultimately, I am committed to making decisions grounded in the best available medical and scientific evidence, while remaining flexible enough to adapt our strategies as new information emerges.