California

Q2 California is one of the leading states with the most data centers which are important facilities for processing and storing data. However they also have several environmental and health impacts, such as significant water usage and noise pollution, which can lead to decrease in net economic gains. What policies, if any, do you support in managing existing data centers or establishing additional data centers?

“The proliferation of data centers has greatly outpaced our state’s capacity for meaningful oversight. Their rapid expansion, particularly with the growth of artificial intelligence, raises serious questions about energy demand, water consumption, noise, and impacts on surrounding communities. I support a moratorium on new large-scale AI data centers until California establishes clear standards to address those impacts and ensures that their growth does not undermine our climate and clean-energy goals.

Existing facilities should be subject to greater transparency regarding their energy and water use and held to strong environmental and public health standards. California should also ensure that data centers are not increasing electricity costs for working families or placing additional strain on communities already facing water or energy challenges.

This is not about rejecting technology or innovation. It is about making sure California understands the consequences of this rapidly growing industry and implements policies that work for our state before allowing unchecked expansion. Any future data center development should show it can operate responsibly and efficiently, protecting our natural resources, our electrical grid, and the communities where these facilities are located. Stakeholders from all sides of this conversation need to be at the table to ensure we get this right.”

KEYWORDS: AI Oversight, Resource Sustainability, Community Protection

Q2 California is one of the leading states with the most data centers which are important facilities for processing and storing data. However they also have several environmental and health impacts, such as significant water usage and noise pollution, which can lead to decrease in net economic gains. What policies, if any, do you support in managing existing data centers or establishing additional data centers?

“I share the concerns about the resource burden, land use, and pollution that come with data centers. These facilities use enormous amounts of water and power, and they run cooling equipment and generators that produce constant noise, increasingly next to homes and farmland. We need to be smart about where and how they get built. As a councilmember and president of the California Contract Cities Association, I believe new data center projects should move forward only with local community input and consent. They should pay for their own renewable power, and they should give back to the community by adding to the grid and lowering utility prices for neighbors. Residents should not pay for the infrastructure these facilities need, and the industry should be transparent about the water and energy it uses. Siting decisions should rest on a careful review of resource use and environmental impact, with input from the local community. California has the workforce and the expertise to lead in innovation without causing harm. Let’s keep these jobs here without lowering our standards to those of other states.”

Q2 California is one of the leading states with the most data centers which are important facilities for processing and storing data. However they also have several environmental and health impacts, such as significant water usage and noise pollution, which can lead to decrease in net economic gains. What policies, if any, do you support in managing existing data centers or establishing additional data centers?

“On a federal level, I would support imposing a moratorium on new AI data centers until we have enforceable federal standards. Furthermore, any facility should be required to disclose its water and energy consumption publicly and continuously. It should pay the full cost of the grid capacity it demands, rather than passing that cost to ratepayers who never agreed to subsidize it. It should not receive tax abatements to locate in communities already carrying the worst pollution burden. Also, local governments must retain the authority to say no to data center proposals in their jurisdiction.”

KEYWORDS: predatory, extractive, pollution

Q2 California is one of the leading states with the most data centers which are important facilities for processing and storing data. However they also have several environmental and health impacts, such as significant water usage and noise pollution, which can lead to decrease in net economic gains. What policies, if any, do you support in managing existing data centers or establishing additional data centers?

“Tech billionaires should not make the rules while working families pay the price. Data centers power our economy, but their growth cannot threaten our water, grid, or communities.

I oppose new data center construction unless four strict conditions are met:

Union Labor: Facilities must be built entirely with union labor.

Water Protection: No community drinking water or groundwater. Data centers must use closed-loop cooling or recycled water.

Ratepayer Protection: Working families must never subsidize tech energy demands. Data centers must pay their own transmission and infrastructure costs.

Grid Enhancement: Data centers must strengthen our grid by bringing new clean generation and battery storage online and funding local grid upgrades.

Approvals must also account for cumulative environmental and public-health impacts, including noise, backup-generator emissions, and proximity to homes, with continuous monitoring and meaningful penalties.

California can lead in technology without sacrificing our resources—but only with strict rules, real enforcement, and consequences for bad actors.”

KEYWORDS: Union Labor, Water Protection, Ratepayer Protection, Grid Reliability, Accountability

Q2 California is one of the leading states with the most data centers which are important facilities for processing and storing data. However they also have several environmental and health impacts, such as significant water usage and noise pollution, which can lead to decrease in net economic gains. What policies, if any, do you support in managing existing data centers or establishing additional data centers?

“Data centers must be held to strict conditions before they’re approved to move forward. I support requiring 100% clean power sourcing for large new electricity users like data centers, along with strong limits on water use, especially given how water-intensive cooling systems can be in a state already managing drought and scarcity. Siting matters too. I don’t support approving new data centers in communities already overburdened by pollution and industrial noise unless there are clear, enforceable community benefits attached, like local hiring commitments and infrastructure investments. Communities shouldn’t bear new environmental and health costs, including noise pollution, without getting something tangible in return. I also want ongoing community oversight, not just conditions set at approval, so residents have a real voice if problems emerge after a facility is built. And ratepayers shouldn’t be left covering the cost of the massive electricity demand these facilities create; utilities and data center operators should bear those infrastructure costs directly, not push them onto everyday households. California can be a hub for this industry, but only if we require clean power, protect water resources, and make sure growth doesn’t come at the expense of the communities living closest to it.”

Q2 California is one of the leading states with the most data centers which are important facilities for processing and storing data. However they also have several environmental and health impacts, such as significant water usage and noise pollution, which can lead to decrease in net economic gains. What policies, if any, do you support in managing existing data centers or establishing additional data centers?

“California has a critical role to play for both existing and new data centers. I support the package of bills that were recently signed into law by the Governor to ensure transparency and reporting for data centers, especially with regard to water and energy use and the greater impact for the general public. While land use decisions often reside at the local level, reporting and transparency standards are best implemented at a state level rather than project by project.”

KEYWORDS: data centers, transparency, water usage, energy usage

Q2 California is one of the leading states with the most data centers which are important facilities for processing and storing data. However they also have several environmental and health impacts, such as significant water usage and noise pollution, which can lead to decrease in net economic gains. What policies, if any, do you support in managing existing data centers or establishing additional data centers?

“Data centers are driving up energy demand, straining water resources, and pushing up electricity costs for everyday Californians, all while companies keep their power and water use hidden from the public. I supported AB 1577, the Data Center Energy Accountability Act, because ratepayers deserve transparency into exactly how much energy and water these facilities consume.

Beyond transparency, I believe no new data center should move forward without meeting strict, enforceable conditions: it must bring new clean energy online rather than draw from an already-strained grid; rely on recycled or non-potable water and prove it won’t compete with local drinking water supplies; undergo full environmental review with early community input; and deliver real community benefits such as local hiring, union jobs, and energy bill relief for surrounding neighborhoods.

Location matters too. These facilities shouldn’t be sited in ways that worsen air quality, strain local infrastructure, or burden already-overburdened communities. If a project can’t meet these standards, it shouldn’t be approved. Data centers shouldn’t expand at the expense of ratepayers and the communities around them.”

Q1 California is rich in natural resources (i.e. oil, with California being the 7th largest oil producing state in the nation) and, as of June 2025, conserves 26.1% of its lands and 21.9% of its coastal waters. Given California’s resources, what policies would you pursue or continue, if any, in regard to land management and use?

“California’s natural resources are one of our greatest assets, safeguarded by generations that came before us, and we have a responsibility to manage them in ways that protect biodiversity, strengthen climate resilience, and preserve them for future generations. I strongly support California’s 30x30 goal and investment in protecting and restoring open space, wetlands, forests, coastal areas, wildlife habitat, and working lands.

In Assembly District 12, protecting open space and preventing sprawl are important. Before serving on the Rohnert Park City Council, I worked on the campaign to establish a permanent urban growth boundary. I would bring that same commitment to the Legislature by supporting habitat and watershed restoration, wildfire resilience, sustainable agriculture, Tribal stewardship, and equitable public access to nature.

We also need responsible land use planning as California transitions to clean energy. Renewable energy, transmission, and storage projects should be accelerated, but should prioritize already developed, disturbed, or degraded lands rather than sacrificing sensitive habitat or protected public lands.

California should also continue moving away from fossil fuel extraction. I support ending new oil drilling permits and transitioning existing production responsibly, while ensuring workers and communities dependent on those industries have pathways to good union jobs in clean energy, environmental restoration, and climate resilience.”

KEYWORDS: 30x30 Conservation, Climate Resilience, Just Transition

Q1 California is rich in natural resources (i.e. oil, with California being the 7th largest oil producing state in the nation) and, as of June 2025, conserves 26.1% of its lands and 21.9% of its coastal waters. Given California’s resources, what policies would you pursue or continue, if any, in regard to land management and use?

“I will confront climate change and the Trump administration’s environmental rollbacks with bold action that centers environmental justice. That starts with our coastline. I oppose the administration’s push to expand offshore drilling. This district runs from Malibu to the Palos Verdes Peninsula, and the spills in Santa Barbara in 1969 and Huntington Beach in 2021 showed what drilling costs our communities. Even when leases are federal, the State Lands Commission can refuse the pipelines and onshore facilities drilling depends on, and California should use that authority. As a member of the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission, I’ll bring environmental advocates and local governments together to protect endangered species and fund the restoration of sandbanks and dunes. On land use, I’ll accelerate wildfire prevention and proactive brush clearance in high-fire-risk areas, expand urban tree canopies, and prioritize equitable access to green space in neighborhoods hardest hit by extreme heat, guided by advocates like Climate Resolve, Sierra Club, and the Los Angeles Neighborhood Land Trust. As we move away from fossil fuels, I’ll bring environmentalists and energy producers to the same table and make sure oil and refinery workers get job training for green jobs with equal pay and benefits.”

Q1 California is rich in natural resources (i.e. oil, with California being the 7th largest oil producing state in the nation) and, as of June 2025, conserves 26.1% of its lands and 21.9% of its coastal waters. Given California’s resources, what policies would you pursue or continue, if any, in regard to land management and use?

“California is currently facing an increasing number of intense wildfires. At the same time, the current administration and Congress have weakened and reversed protections for public lands. Because land management plays an important role in addressing wildfires and given the current administration’s recent actions to reduce staff in agencies such as the U.S. Forest Service, I would pursue policies that would properly fund federal agencies that play vital roles in helping California address and prevent wildfires. I would also pursue policies like the Public Lands Integrity Act that would prevent Congress from easily selling public lands and ensure public voice on decisions around public lands. Our natural resources are invaluable parts of our communities and I would make sure our communities have a seat in D.C. on important issues including our air, water, and land.”

KEYWORDS: justice, responsibility, accountability

Q1 California is rich in natural resources (i.e. oil, with California being the 7th largest oil producing state in the nation) and, as of June 2025, conserves 26.1% of its lands and 21.9% of its coastal waters. Given California’s resources, what policies would you pursue or continue, if any, in regard to land management and use?

“California’s land-use policy should be guided by the best available science to conserve natural resources and protect the health and quality of life of current and future generations.

California should maintain its commitment to conserve 30% of its lands and coastal waters by 2030, with measurable outcomes that protect biodiversity hotspots, wildlife corridors, watersheds, wetlands, and other critical habitats. We should also invest in habitat restoration, wildlife connectivity, and science-based forest and wildfire management, including prescribed and beneficial fire. Management of public lands should include greater partnership with California Native American tribes and incorporate traditional ecological knowledge.

We must also responsibly address the legacy of oil production. Operators should be required to safely plug idle and orphaned wells and remediate contaminated land so taxpayers and communities are not left paying for environmental damage.

Finally, conservation must go hand in hand with access to nature. Too many urban and underserved communities lack parks, trees, and green space. As State Senator, I would work to strengthen biodiversity while expanding access to nature, improving air and water quality, and helping communities become more resilient to climate change.”

KEYWORDS: Conservation, Biodiversity, Restoration, Stewardship, Resilience

Q1 California is rich in natural resources (i.e. oil, with California being the 7th largest oil producing state in the nation) and, as of June 2025, conserves 26.1% of its lands and 21.9% of its coastal waters. Given California’s resources, what policies would you pursue or continue, if any, in regard to land management and use?

“California’s land is one of our greatest assets, and we have to manage it as both an economic resource and an ecological trust. I support continuing California’s 30x30 goal of conserving 30% of lands and coastal waters by 2030, and while current progress shows how much work remains, I’d push for accelerated funding for land acquisition, habitat corridors, and coastal protections rather than scaling back the ambition.

On oil, I support strong health-protective setbacks between drilling operations and homes, schools, and other sensitive sites, along with a managed, accountable transition away from fossil fuel extraction that includes remediation of existing wells and support for affected workers.

I also believe we need CEQA reform that distinguishes infill, urban housing development from true greenfield projects, so we protect open space and sensitive habitats while making it easier to build housing where it belongs. Land use decisions should reduce wildfire risk through responsible forest and vegetation management, and clean energy siting should prioritize disturbed or already-developed land, rooftop solar, and agrivoltaics before opening new public lands to development.

Conservation, responsible resource use, and smart housing growth aren’t competing goals. They can and should reinforce each other.”

Q1 California is rich in natural resources (i.e. oil, with California being the 7th largest oil producing state in the nation) and, as of June 2025, conserves 26.1% of its lands and 21.9% of its coastal waters. Given California’s resources, what policies would you pursue or continue, if any, in regard to land management and use?

“Both Marin and Sonoma are leaders and examples in the protection of public lands and natural resources, with many strategies that can be scaled throughout the state.

Simply acquiring open space or expanding conservation easements is important, but lands need to be properly managed and maintained as risks of wildfires continue to increase. Reaching our 30x30 goal is more than just a stat, it is a longterm commitment to sustainable management. Below are some policies to pursue and continue:

• Sustainable practices for working lands (farming, forestry, ranching)
• Co-management agreements with tribal nations
• Coastal protection - expanded Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) with a focus on kelp forests”

KEYWORDS: 30x30, co-management, kelp forests, marin protected areas

Q1 California is rich in natural resources (i.e. oil, with California being the 7th largest oil producing state in the nation) and, as of June 2025, conserves 26.1% of its lands and 21.9% of its coastal waters. Given California’s resources, what policies would you pursue or continue, if any, in regard to land management and use?

“California’s dual identity as a top oil-producing state and conservation leader means pursuing two goals at once: winding down extraction responsibly while accelerating protection of the land we have left.

I strongly support accelerating 30x30, with dedicated, ongoing funding for land acquisition and stewardship developed in partnership with Tribal nations, land trusts, and frontline communities - not just remote wilderness, but urban parks and working lands too. I support a managed, predictable phasedown of oil and gas, with mandatory setbacks near homes and schools, and remediation of idle wells funded by industry fees, not taxpayers, led by union labor.

For clean energy, I’d prioritize siting solar, wind, and storage on already-disturbed land - rooftops, parking lots, former industrial sites - before opening protected public lands, paired with streamlined permitting tied to strong environmental and labor standards. Land-use investment should flow first to frontline communities that have carried the burden of pollution, through cleanup, tree canopy expansion, and green space. Finally, land use should support housing stability by expanding community land trusts to keep land off speculative markets.”

Q3 In 2025, approximately 33% of students in K-12 schools across California met or exceeded science standards, and teacher shortages have resulted in districts hiring teachers with substandard credentials in math and science. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you follow to increase science proficiency and access to quality education across the state and why?

“As a longtime classroom educator, I believe improving science proficiency starts with ensuring every student has access to qualified educators, a strong curriculum, and the resources needed for hands-on learning. California should continue investing in evidence-based teacher recruitment and retention strategies, including paid teacher residencies, scholarships and credentialing support, and pathways for classified employees and paraprofessionals to become credentialed teachers, particularly in high-need fields like math and science.

We also need to retain the educators we already have through competitive compensation, manageable class sizes, mentoring, professional development, and strong working conditions. Simply lowering preparation standards to address shortages is not a sustainable solution.

For students, I support greater investment in hands-on, inquiry-based science instruction; modern laboratories and classroom materials; tutoring and extended learning opportunities; and stronger connections between science education and career technical education. Those opportunities must be available in every community, not determined by a student’s ZIP code.

Finally, we should provide additional support for multilingual learners and students who have historically had less access to advanced STEM coursework. Raising science proficiency requires both high expectations and equitable access to the resources that allow students to meet them.”

KEYWORDS: Teacher Recruitment, STEM Access, Hands-On Learning

Q3 In 2025, approximately 33% of students in K-12 schools across California met or exceeded science standards, and teacher shortages have resulted in districts hiring teachers with substandard credentials in math and science. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you follow to increase science proficiency and access to quality education across the state and why?

“I’m a product of public schools, and I’ve taught at the college level. Students can’t meet science standards without qualified teachers in the classroom, and California ranks 28th in the nation in per-student funding. For the fourth largest economy on earth, that is indefensible. We don’t have a shortage of qualified Californians. We have a shortage of Californians willing to work for inadequate pay. I’ll introduce incentives to recruit more teachers, retain excellent ones, and support their continued education, including tuition-free pathways so student debt doesn’t deter people before they start. Pay and benefits have to reflect the value of the work, and affordable workforce housing near schools would let teachers live where they teach. Districts also can’t hire and plan when funding is uncertain. I’ll push to fund the Proposition 98 guarantee as calculated, without deferrals, and fight federal education cuts with state dollars so schools have a safe, equipped environment for 21st-century learning. Before I author an education bill, I’ll go to the people who do the work. I plan to convene an education kitchen cabinet of teachers, school leaders, and families to tell me what’s working and what isn’t.”

Q3 In 2025, approximately 33% of students in K-12 schools across California met or exceeded science standards, and teacher shortages have resulted in districts hiring teachers with substandard credentials in math and science. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you follow to increase science proficiency and access to quality education across the state and why?

“On the federal level, I would support these proposals to increase science proficiency and access to quality education: the Addressing Teacher Shortages Act to help address root causes of teacher shortages, the NEED Act and RESULTS Act to improve the process of research, evaluation, and sharing of results from various education initiatives, and provide robust funding for STEM education programs from the Education Department and other relevant agencies. The Addressing Teacher Shortages Act would provide grants that states like California can use to expand or establish programs to train and retain science teachers. With rapid advancement in areas like AI, the NEED Act focuses on establishing a center to promote innovative education research and disseminate best practices to improve students’ academic performance. To ensure that the research can easily be shared nationwide, the RESULTS Act would modernize the data system and encourage connected insights between early childhood, K-12 education, and the workforce. Finally, I would focus on ensuring that the following federal programs have robust funding to support STEM education: Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship program, 21st Century Community Learning Centers, ESSA Title IV, Part A (Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grants), and ESSA Title II, Part A (Supporting Effective Instruction).”

KEYWORDS: development, funding, disseminate

Q3 In 2025, approximately 33% of students in K-12 schools across California met or exceeded science standards, and teacher shortages have resulted in districts hiring teachers with substandard credentials in math and science. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you follow to increase science proficiency and access to quality education across the state and why?

“Here’s a tighter version at 189 words:

As a former public middle school teacher and current community college trustee, I believe improving science proficiency starts with ensuring every student has a highly qualified teacher and meaningful, hands-on instruction.

California should invest in proven teacher recruitment and retention programs, including teacher residencies, paid student teaching, and financial assistance for educators who commit to teaching science and math in high-need schools.

Students also need access to laboratories, up-to-date instructional materials, environmental and outdoor education, project-based learning, and teachers with ongoing professional development. Resources should be prioritized for schools serving low-income and disadvantaged communities. A student’s ZIP code should never determine whether they have access to excellent science teachers, laboratories, or advanced STEM coursework.

California must also strengthen pathways from K-12 science education to community colleges, universities, apprenticeships, and careers in fields such as health care, clean energy, biotechnology, engineering, manufacturing, and environmental science.

Finally, the state should regularly measure student progress, evaluate which interventions are producing results, and invest in what works. California cannot remain a global science and technology leader without ensuring its students have the education and opportunities to participate in that future.”

KEYWORDS: Teacher Quality, Hands-On Learning, STEM Equity, Career Pathways, Accountability

Q3 In 2025, approximately 33% of students in K-12 schools across California met or exceeded science standards, and teacher shortages have resulted in districts hiring teachers with substandard credentials in math and science. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you follow to increase science proficiency and access to quality education across the state and why?

“A 33% science proficiency rate reflects deeper, systemic problems in how California funds and staffs its schools, and the fixes have to start there. I support strengthening the Local Control Funding Formula with a larger equity multiplier for districts serving concentrated poverty, English learners, and students with disabilities, since these are often the same schools struggling most to hire qualified science and math teachers. On the teacher shortage specifically, I support expanding loan forgiveness and housing assistance programs targeted at STEM educators, along with competitive, state-funded wage increases so experienced teachers aren’t priced out of the communities where they teach. We also need stronger, faster credentialing pathways, including support for teachers pursuing STEM credentials while already in the classroom, rather than relying on underqualified emergency-permit hires. Smaller class sizes and adequate staffing ratios matter too. Teachers can’t deliver hands-on, inquiry-based science instruction, which the research shows drives real proficiency gains, when they’re stretched too thin. I’d also prioritize funding for lab equipment, materials, and professional development in high-poverty districts, since access to real scientific instruction shouldn’t depend on a district’s property tax base.”

Q3 In 2025, approximately 33% of students in K-12 schools across California met or exceeded science standards, and teacher shortages have resulted in districts hiring teachers with substandard credentials in math and science. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you follow to increase science proficiency and access to quality education across the state and why?

“One way to address this is through the establishment of more 4 year STEM programs at our High Schools. The STEM program at San Marin High School in Novato is a model that can be replicated. It is also critical that these programs be implemented equitably and not just at high resources school districts and campuses. At revenue limit districts, programs like these can be a draw for high schools to boost enrollment which then supports the program. Also, 4 year STEM programs will also help attract and retain science and math teachers.”

KEYWORDS: STEM, San Marin High School, retention, recruitment

Q3 In 2025, approximately 33% of students in K-12 schools across California met or exceeded science standards, and teacher shortages have resulted in districts hiring teachers with substandard credentials in math and science. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you follow to increase science proficiency and access to quality education across the state and why?

“Only a third of California students meeting science standards reflects a workforce crisis as much as a curriculum one. Districts are hiring under-credentialed teachers in math and science because we haven’t made the profession sustainable. I’ll fight to increase per-pupil funding to the average of the ten highest-funded states, reduce class sizes, and raise teacher pay and benefits so districts can recruit and retain qualified STEM educators instead of relying on emergency permits.

I support expanding teacher residency and apprenticeship pipelines, particularly in math and science, with loan forgiveness and mentorship for new educators in high-need districts. I’d also invest in ongoing professional development so teachers already in classrooms can strengthen science instruction rather than leaving the field.

Beyond staffing, I support the Community Schools model - wraparound health, mental health, and family support services - paired with expanded STEM and career-technical education programs that connect students to real pathways in the green economy and beyond. Evidence shows smaller class sizes and stable, well-supported teachers drive proficiency gains. This has to be the foundation.”

Q4 Healthcare is an important resource to Californians, with publicly supported programs such as Medi-Cal providing coverage covering roughly half of all Californians including 14.5 million low-income residents. According to the Center on Healthcare from West Health-Gallup, California has an overall healthcare grade of “C” over the categories of cost, quality, and access, with gaps in rural health coverage, environmental health threats, workforce shortages, and affordability challenges. What policies, if any, do you support to address the healthcare of Californians and why?

“I believe healthcare is a human right, and I support moving California toward universal, single-payer healthcare through CalCare so access to care is based on need, not income or employment. Until we achieve that goal, we must protect and strengthen Medi-Cal, expand coverage, reduce out-of-pocket costs, and ensure Californians can access mental health, reproductive, preventive, and primary care.

We also need to address our healthcare workforce shortage. I support strong staffing standards, investments in healthcare education and training, and efforts to recruit and retain providers in rural and underserved communities. Healthcare workers should have the staffing, protections, and working conditions necessary to provide quality care.

Public health also extends beyond the healthcare system. Clean air, safe drinking water, healthy housing, and protection from toxic pollution directly affect health outcomes. California should continue holding polluters accountable and investing in communities that have experienced disproportionate environmental and public health burdens.

Our goal should be a healthcare system that puts patients and public health ahead of profit and ensures quality care is accessible to every Californian.”

KEYWORDS: Universal Healthcare, Healthcare Workforce, Health Equity

Q5 Infectious disease outbreaks in California, like measles and foodborne illnesses, are on the rise and have had significant impacts on the state’s health, agriculture, and produce economy. In some counties in California, vaccination rates are low, making communities potentially vulnerable to measles outbreaks. Furthermore, California is responsible for over a third of the US’s fresh produce, which is a common source of foodborne illness. What policies, if any, do you support for implementing preventative measures and mitigating strategies against outbreaks?

“Prevention is one of the most effective investments we can make in public health. I support maintaining California’s evidence-based vaccination requirements for schools and childcare, while making vaccines and reliable health information accessible in every community. We should also strengthen local public health departments, so they have the staffing, laboratory capacity, and resources to identify outbreaks quickly, conduct contact tracing, and respond before isolated cases become larger emergencies.

California also has a responsibility to protect our food supply, especially at a time when the federal government is negligent in its oversight responsibilities. As one of the country’s largest agricultural producers, we should invest in disease surveillance, testing, inspection, and rapid response systems throughout the food supply chain. We should continue working with growers, farmworkers, researchers, and public health agencies to identify contamination sources and improve prevention, including protecting agricultural water quality and strengthening worker training and safety.

State and local public health agencies, healthcare providers, schools, agricultural agencies, and producers should also be able to share information quickly during outbreaks. Strong prevention protects public health, keeps children in school, protects workers and consumers, and helps avoid the greater economic costs of widespread outbreaks.”

KEYWORDS: Prevention, Vaccination, Food Safety

Q4 Healthcare is an important resource to Californians, with publicly supported programs such as Medi-Cal providing coverage covering roughly half of all Californians including 14.5 million low-income residents. According to the Center on Healthcare from West Health-Gallup, California has an overall healthcare grade of “C” over the categories of cost, quality, and access, with gaps in rural health coverage, environmental health threats, workforce shortages, and affordability challenges. What policies, if any, do you support to address the healthcare of Californians and why?

“I believe access to quality, affordable health care is a fundamental right, and that when families are healthier, communities are stronger. As someone who was in elected office during COVID and the MPOX outbreak, I know a health care system is only as strong as its weakest point of access. Right now that weak point is federal cuts. I’ll fight to defend Medi-Cal enrollment as new federal paperwork rules take effect. People without insurance don’t stop getting sick; they show up in the emergency room, where the bill lands on taxpayers anyway. The state must act fast to fill the gaps these cuts create. I’ll also fight to remove barriers to primary care, mental health services, reproductive health care, and preventive treatment like HIV/STI testing and PrEP/PEP. To address the shortage of providers and long wait times, I’ll keep building programs that bring people into the health care field. Environmental threats are health threats, which is why I’ll push for stronger heat mitigation policies in the neighborhoods hit hardest by extreme weather. Long term, I support a Medicare for All, single-payer model so every Californian can get timely, affordable, culturally competent care.”

Q5 Infectious disease outbreaks in California, like measles and foodborne illnesses, are on the rise and have had significant impacts on the state’s health, agriculture, and produce economy. In some counties in California, vaccination rates are low, making communities potentially vulnerable to measles outbreaks. Furthermore, California is responsible for over a third of the US’s fresh produce, which is a common source of foodborne illness. What policies, if any, do you support for implementing preventative measures and mitigating strategies against outbreaks?

“I was in elected office when COVID and MPOX hit my community hard. We made sure residents and small businesses were protected and that medical care reached the people most at risk. That experience taught me that a health system is only as strong as its weakest point of access, and that outbreaks spread faster where people can’t get care. Prevention starts with coverage. Protecting Medi-Cal access is one of the best ways to prevent future pandemics, because people without insurance put off care until they’re sick enough for the emergency room. I’ll fight to keep Californians enrolled as federal cuts take effect and use state dollars to fill the gaps Washington leaves. I’ll also remove barriers to preventive care, from primary care to HIV/STI testing and PrEP/PEP, and strengthen the preventive and behavioral health services our communities rely on. Our food system matters too. California feeds the country, and I support helping smaller growers and producers through regional food hubs, shared cold storage, and cooperative distribution. With the Trump administration undermining public health, California has to lead. I’ll listen to public health experts and make sure state policy follows the evidence, not politics.”

Q4 Healthcare is an important resource to Californians, with publicly supported programs such as Medi-Cal providing coverage covering roughly half of all Californians including 14.5 million low-income residents. According to the Center on Healthcare from West Health-Gallup, California has an overall healthcare grade of “C” over the categories of cost, quality, and access, with gaps in rural health coverage, environmental health threats, workforce shortages, and affordability challenges. What policies, if any, do you support to address the healthcare of Californians and why?

“On a federal level, I would support Medicare for All. Working to pass Medicare for All will be one of my top goals in Congress and is why I decided to run for this seat. According to the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2024 data, the CA-34th Congressional District has an uninsured rate that’s worse than the national average. In addition, the district is made up of predominantly Latino, immigrant, women, and working-class families. Because of the diverse makeup of our communities and the need for affordable healthcare, I support Medicare for All. Until then, I would support the following provisions to strengthen our healthcare system: funding home and community-based services to ensure seniors and people with disabilities are not forced into institutions, expanding Medicare to cover dental, vision, and hearing, reversing Medicaid work requirements and eligibility paperwork to push people away from coverage, and capping insulin and inhaler costs for everyone, not just Medicare enrollees. There are more things that must be done but this is the bare minimum.”

KEYWORDS: universal, affordability, access

Q5 Infectious disease outbreaks in California, like measles and foodborne illnesses, are on the rise and have had significant impacts on the state’s health, agriculture, and produce economy. In some counties in California, vaccination rates are low, making communities potentially vulnerable to measles outbreaks. Furthermore, California is responsible for over a third of the US’s fresh produce, which is a common source of foodborne illness. What policies, if any, do you support for implementing preventative measures and mitigating strategies against outbreaks?

“I support federal funding for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and for state and local health departments. Funding that rises and falls with each emergency leaves counties unable to detect outbreaks early. In communities across CA-34, I would support expanding mobile and school-based clinics, and outreach. In low-coverage counties, the barriers are often access, language, and mistrust, and policy should address each directly. I would support full funding for the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), including the Produce Safety Rule, along with adequate staffing at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Technical assistance for small growers and faster traceback systems would improve safety while limiting economic damage from a contamination event. For farmworkers, I would support paid sick leave, advocate for clean facilities, and accessible health services. We also need coordinated federal, state, and local planning, appropriately timely data sharing, and clear, science-based communication are essential for our public health.”

KEYWORDS: trust, safety, care

Q4 Healthcare is an important resource to Californians, with publicly supported programs such as Medi-Cal providing coverage covering roughly half of all Californians including 14.5 million low-income residents. According to the Center on Healthcare from West Health-Gallup, California has an overall healthcare grade of “C” over the categories of cost, quality, and access, with gaps in rural health coverage, environmental health threats, workforce shortages, and affordability challenges. What policies, if any, do you support to address the healthcare of Californians and why?

“I believe healthcare is a human right. No one should have to choose between getting the care they need and paying their rent or putting food on the table. California should continue working toward universal healthcare that provides affordable, high-quality care to everyone, regardless of income, employment, or immigration status.

As we work toward that goal, we need to protect Medi-Cal and strengthen the community clinics, hospitals, and providers that millions of Californians rely on.

We also have to address our healthcare workforce shortage. As a community college trustee, I have seen firsthand the role our public colleges can play in preparing nurses, behavioral health professionals, and other healthcare workers for good-paying careers. We should expand these programs and provide scholarships, loan repayment, and residency opportunities that bring more providers into underserved communities.

We also need to invest in primary and preventive care and hold down prescription drug and healthcare costs.

Ultimately, having an insurance card is not enough. Success means every Californian can actually get timely, affordable, quality care when they need it.”

KEYWORDS: Universal Healthcare, Medi-Cal, Workforce, Affordability, Preventive Care

Q5 Infectious disease outbreaks in California, like measles and foodborne illnesses, are on the rise and have had significant impacts on the state’s health, agriculture, and produce economy. In some counties in California, vaccination rates are low, making communities potentially vulnerable to measles outbreaks. Furthermore, California is responsible for over a third of the US’s fresh produce, which is a common source of foodborne illness. What policies, if any, do you support for implementing preventative measures and mitigating strategies against outbreaks?

“California is better off investing in a strong public health system that prevents disease and catches outbreaks early than waiting until people are sick and reacting to a crisis.

I support maintaining California’s evidence-based childhood vaccination requirements and making recommended vaccines affordable and accessible to every family. Public health information should be transparent, available in multiple languages, and based on the best available science. We should use data to identify communities with lower vaccination rates and provide targeted education and access.

California also needs strong laboratories, epidemiologists, public health workers, and disease reporting systems so we can quickly identify and contain outbreaks.

As one of the nation’s largest food producers, California must also maintain strong food safety standards from farms to grocery stores. That means better testing and traceability, protecting agricultural water, enforcing sanitation standards, and working closely with growers, processors, and public health agencies to prevent contamination before people get sick.

Public health depends on public trust. Officials should be clear about what we know, what we don’t know, and what people can do to protect themselves. Decisions should be driven by science and evidence, not misinformation or political pressure.”

KEYWORDS: Prevention, Vaccinations, Disease Surveillance, Food Safety, Public Trust

Q4 Healthcare is an important resource to Californians, with publicly supported programs such as Medi-Cal providing coverage covering roughly half of all Californians including 14.5 million low-income residents. According to the Center on Healthcare from West Health-Gallup, California has an overall healthcare grade of “C” over the categories of cost, quality, and access, with gaps in rural health coverage, environmental health threats, workforce shortages, and affordability challenges. What policies, if any, do you support to address the healthcare of Californians and why?

“A ““C”” grade reflects a healthcare system with deep structural gaps, and I believe the long-term answer is moving California toward a single-payer, publicly financed system that guarantees care as a right, not a privilege tied to employment or ability to pay. SB 770 laid important groundwork, and I’d push to finish its financing analysis and pursue the federal waivers needed so California isn’t stuck waiting on Congress.

In the near term, Medi-Cal needs real investment: higher provider reimbursement rates so patients aren’t stuck on waitlists, expanded language access and culturally competent care, and stronger outreach so eligible residents stay enrolled. I also support extending full Medi-Cal parity to all income-eligible Californians regardless of immigration status, since a two-tiered system just delays costlier emergency care.

On rural and workforce gaps, I support expanded mobile clinics, community health partnerships, and incentives like loan forgiveness to recruit providers into underserved areas. I also support the Office of Health Care Affordability’s cost targets, though I want to make sure they don’t become a substitute for the bigger structural fix.

Affordability, access, and quality are connected. Piecemeal fixes help, but California needs to keep building toward guaranteed coverage for everyone.”

Q5 Infectious disease outbreaks in California, like measles and foodborne illnesses, are on the rise and have had significant impacts on the state’s health, agriculture, and produce economy. In some counties in California, vaccination rates are low, making communities potentially vulnerable to measles outbreaks. Furthermore, California is responsible for over a third of the US’s fresh produce, which is a common source of foodborne illness. What policies, if any, do you support for implementing preventative measures and mitigating strategies against outbreaks?

“Vaccine hesitancy and outbreaks like measles and cyclospora call for the same core strategy: trusted, community-rooted public health infrastructure, backed by real state investment. As a community health worker during COVID, I saw firsthand how misinformation, not lack of access, kept people from getting vaccinated, including women in our community told by trusted figures that vaccines would harm their fertility. That taught me that public health messaging only works when it comes from messengers people already trust.

I support funding community health workers, promotoras, and culturally and linguistically specific outreach organizations to lead vaccination campaigns in low-coverage counties, rather than relying solely on top-down mandates. I also support strengthening school vaccination requirement enforcement and closing loopholes that allow low-coverage clusters to persist.

On foodborne illness, given how central California produce is to both our economy and the nation’s food supply, I support increased funding for state agricultural inspection and food safety surveillance, particularly around water sources used in irrigation, since contaminated water is a common root cause of outbreaks like cyclosporiasis.

Finally, California needs to backfill federal disease surveillance and immunization funding if it’s cut or politicized, so our public health infrastructure doesn’t collapse when Washington turns its back on basic prevention.”

Q4 Healthcare is an important resource to Californians, with publicly supported programs such as Medi-Cal providing coverage covering roughly half of all Californians including 14.5 million low-income residents. According to the Center on Healthcare from West Health-Gallup, California has an overall healthcare grade of “C” over the categories of cost, quality, and access, with gaps in rural health coverage, environmental health threats, workforce shortages, and affordability challenges. What policies, if any, do you support to address the healthcare of Californians and why?

“This is becoming even more challenging with some of the state changes for Medi-Cal eligibility and of course the massive cuts under HR1. Our community clinics / Federal Qualified Health Centers serve roughly 20-25% of California residents, many of whom are enrolled in Medi-Cal. Making it easier for these clinics to assist counties with the enrollment process and also allowing for same day billing (such as primary care and behavioral care) will lead to better outcomes for the most vulnerable residents.

I have also joined with CPCA and our Community Health Centers in opposing Prop 44.”

KEYWORDS: FQHC, community health centers, No on 44

Q5 Infectious disease outbreaks in California, like measles and foodborne illnesses, are on the rise and have had significant impacts on the state’s health, agriculture, and produce economy. In some counties in California, vaccination rates are low, making communities potentially vulnerable to measles outbreaks. Furthermore, California is responsible for over a third of the US’s fresh produce, which is a common source of foodborne illness. What policies, if any, do you support for implementing preventative measures and mitigating strategies against outbreaks?

“It is critical that California continues to push back on changes by the federal administration to change vaccination guidance that is not based on science. Combined with loss of funding, it will continue to be a challenge to do the outreach and education needed, but when local communities and county health departments have the right resources, it can be done. Over the years, Marin County has had some of the lowest vaccination rates, but now boasts one of the highest. This has happened at the local level through outreach and advocacy over many years.

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/video/investigations/marin-county-vaccination-rates/3946390/

The budget will continue to be tight, but I would support additional resources to support local jurisdictions to increase vaccination rates and reach herd immunity. It can be done, but needs to be supported locally and resources should be linked to outcomes.”

KEYWORDS: vaccination, Marin County

Q4 Healthcare is an important resource to Californians, with publicly supported programs such as Medi-Cal providing coverage covering roughly half of all Californians including 14.5 million low-income residents. According to the Center on Healthcare from West Health-Gallup, California has an overall healthcare grade of “C” over the categories of cost, quality, and access, with gaps in rural health coverage, environmental health threats, workforce shortages, and affordability challenges. What policies, if any, do you support to address the healthcare of Californians and why?

“Only a third of California students meeting science standards reflects a workforce crisis as much as a curriculum one. Districts are hiring under-credentialed teachers in math and science because we haven’t made the profession sustainable. I’ll fight to increase per-pupil funding to the average of the ten highest-funded states, reduce class sizes, and raise teacher pay and benefits so districts can recruit and retain qualified STEM educators instead of relying on emergency permits.

I support expanding teacher residency and apprenticeship pipelines, particularly in math and science, with loan forgiveness and mentorship for new educators in high-need districts. I’d also invest in ongoing professional development so teachers already in classrooms can strengthen science instruction rather than leaving the field.

Beyond staffing, I support the Community Schools model - wraparound health, mental health, and family support services - paired with expanded STEM and career-technical education programs that connect students to real pathways in the green economy and beyond. Evidence shows smaller class sizes and stable, well-supported teachers drive proficiency gains. This has to be the foundation.”

“A ““C”” grade across cost, quality, and access tells me California’s healthcare system works reasonably well for some residents but leaves too many others behind, especially in rural areas and low-income communities. I believe the solution has to address both the near-term gaps and the long-term structure.

I am a proud supporter of CalCare, California’s single payer healthcare proposal, because a system where everyone is covered under one standard of care removes the gaps in cost and access that show up so clearly in Medi-Cal’s patchwork of coverage today. Since Medi-Cal covers close to half of all Californians, I will fight to protect and expand its funding, oppose any budget that treats it as an easy cut, and push back against federal reimbursement cuts by backfilling state dollars where needed.

On workforce shortages, especially in rural and underserved areas, I support scholarships, loan forgiveness, and paid clinical placements for nurses and other health workers who commit to practicing in high need communities.

On environmental health threats, since pollution and toxic exposure drive so much of California’s chronic disease burden, I support fully funded toxic cleanups and stronger enforcement in frontline communities, since environmental policy is health policy.”

Q5 Infectious disease outbreaks in California, like measles and foodborne illnesses, are on the rise and have had significant impacts on the state’s health, agriculture, and produce economy. In some counties in California, vaccination rates are low, making communities potentially vulnerable to measles outbreaks. Furthermore, California is responsible for over a third of the US’s fresh produce, which is a common source of foodborne illness. What policies, if any, do you support for implementing preventative measures and mitigating strategies against outbreaks?

“Rising measles cases and foodborne illness outbreaks show what happens when public health infrastructure and trust erode at the same time. Both problems demand the same core fix. California needs to invest in public health, not just react to crises.

On vaccination, I support strong, well-funded public health outreach and education campaigns in low vaccination counties, delivered through trusted community messengers like local clinics, schools and faith organizations rather than mandates alone. I also support fully funding county public health departments so they can do real- time disease surveillance and respond quickly when outbreaks emerge, since delayed detection is often what turns a local case into a county wide outbreak.

On food safety, given that California grows over a third of the nation’s fresh produce, I support strengthening state inspection and traceability systems for farms and packing facilities, funded in part by industry fees, so contamination can be traced and contained quickly. Farmworkers should also have real protections and paid sick leave, since workers coming to work sick because they cannot afford not to is itself a public health risk. Prevention is cheaper than crisis response, and California’s economy and health depend on getting ahead of both threats.”

Q8 Funding for research in California has dropped by millions in the past year with an ongoing possibility for more reductions. Yet, University research is a major economic driver. For example, according to the University of California, they generate about $14 of economic value for every dollar invested. What policies, if any, do you support to invest in research? What role do you envision science research playing in the state economy?

“California’s investment in scientific research is an investment in our economy, workforce, and ability to solve major challenges. As federal research funding grows increasingly uncertain, California should protect the research capacity of our public universities and prevent the loss of scientists, students, and innovation.

I support sustained state funding for the University of California and California State University systems, along with targeted investments in areas where California has significant needs and an opportunity to lead, including climate science, wildfire resilience, clean energy, water, agriculture, public health, biotechnology, and emerging technologies. We should also invest in graduate students, early-career researchers, laboratories, and research infrastructure.

Research is also economic policy. University research creates jobs, helps launch new technologies and industries, improves agriculture and public health, and gives policymakers better tools to address challenges from wildfire to infectious disease. Public investment should produce public benefit through strong partnerships among universities, government, workers, communities, and responsible industry.

California has built much of its economic strength around education, research, and innovation. Protecting that foundation should remain a state priority.”

KEYWORDS: Research Investment, Public Universities, Innovation Economy

Q8 Funding for research in California has dropped by millions in the past year with an ongoing possibility for more reductions. Yet, University research is a major economic driver. For example, according to the University of California, they generate about $14 of economic value for every dollar invested. What policies, if any, do you support to invest in research? What role do you envision science research playing in the state economy?

“I support maintaining a stable and diversified investment in scientific research, particularly research that addresses California’s long-term needs in areas such as health, agriculture, climate resilience, energy, technology, and infrastructure.

Research funding should come from a combination of state, federal, private, and philanthropic sources. State funding can also help universities attract additional outside research dollars. For example, UC reported approximately $5.8 billion in direct research expenditures in 2023–24, with federal sources accounting for about half of that funding. There is also documented evidence that university research and related activities contribute significantly to California’s economy. UC’s most recent systemwide economic-impact analysis found that UC supports more than 500,000 jobs and generates more than $21 in economic output for every $1 invested by the state. These figures measure the broader economic effects of the University and should not be interpreted as a return generated solely by individual research grants.

I see science research playing a role in California’s economy by supporting innovation, creating skilled jobs, attracting federal and private investment, developing new technologies and businesses, and addressing practical challenges facing the state. Public investment should be accompanied by transparency about how funds are used and measurable outcomes, while recognizing that basic research can take years to produce economic or technological benefits.”

Q8 Funding for research in California has dropped by millions in the past year with an ongoing possibility for more reductions. Yet, University research is a major economic driver. For example, according to the University of California, they generate about $14 of economic value for every dollar invested. What policies, if any, do you support to invest in research? What role do you envision science research playing in the state economy?

“I fully support Senate Bill 895, a $7.5 billion bond measure to fund science and health research at our universities and institutions and I am committed to advocating for the passage of the bond in 2028. This should be our collective top priority to support investments in research.”

KEYWORDS: SB 895, research bond

Q7 Access to public transportation is associated with less air and noise pollution, fewer harmful chemicals, and overall healthier communities. However, many transit agencies, such as BART in the Bay Area, are facing financial deficits due to a decline in ridership. What policies, if any, do you support that would address California’s public transit infrastructure?

“Public transportation is essential infrastructure, and we should fund it like the public service it is. California cannot meet its climate, affordability, and mobility goals if transit agencies are trapped in a cycle of service cuts and declining ridership. I support stable, long-term state funding so agencies can provide frequent, reliable, and affordable service.

We also need to invest in the people who make our transit systems work through strong labor standards, competitive wages and benefits, workforce development, and greater protections for operators and other transit workers.

Increasing ridership requires service people can depend on. I support better frequency and connections between systems, affordable fares, expanded service in working-class, rural, and underserved communities, and improved access for seniors and people with disabilities.

California should continue transitioning public fleets to zero-emission technology while ensuring workers receive the training needed as technology changes. Public dollars should strengthen public transit and good union jobs, not encourage privatization or worker displacement.

In Marin and Sonoma, strengthening bus, ferry, and regional connections is especially important to give residents realistic alternatives to driving while reducing congestion and pollution.”

KEYWORDS: Transit Funding, Union Workforce, Zero-Emission Transit

Q13 The Los Angeles Metro system serves millions of riders every month, with increases in ridership associated with the expansion of Metro stations. Access to public transportation is associated with less air and noise pollution, fewer harmful chemicals, and overall healthier communities. Yet, the Metro still faces public safety concerns, and expansion projects have encountered delays and cost increases while risking community displacement. What policies, if any, do you support regarding Los Angeles public transit infrastructure? Describe evidence that has informed these policies.

“I’m often out cycling and hiking across this district, and transit is central to my climate work. On the City Council, I led regional climate policy that included Metro line expansion, bike safety improvements, and e-bike charging stations. I’m proud to have the support of Streets for All. The evidence is in the ridership. Metro’s numbers climb as new lines open, so expansion works when it’s delivered. To fund it, I’d look at fixing the gas tax shortfalls that burden local governments. I’d hold Metro projects to the same standard I’ve called for on high-speed rail: hard reporting requirements and consequences for delays. On safety, I believe in smart, community-based approaches. Our WeHo Cares program put mental health and substance use professionals on the street, and street homelessness fell 54 percent. I want to expand that model across the region, including where people in crisis end up on transit. New transit should be built to support the community. I am in favor of transit-oriented housing, paired with strong eviction protections and action on Ellis Act and Costa-Hawkins misuse so longtime residents aren’t pushed out by development.”

Q13 The Los Angeles Metro system serves millions of riders every month, with increases in ridership associated with the expansion of Metro stations. Access to public transportation is associated with less air and noise pollution, fewer harmful chemicals, and overall healthier communities. Yet, the Metro still faces public safety concerns, and expansion projects have encountered delays and cost increases while risking community displacement. What policies, if any, do you support regarding Los Angeles public transit infrastructure? Describe evidence that has informed these policies.

“From the federal level, I would reintroduce former Representative Cori Bush’s Bus Rapid Transit Act and Light Rail Transit Act to create grant programs under the Federal Transit Administration for the design and implementation of public transit projects, including for the redesign, retrofit, renovation, update, and repair of existing public transit systems. I support these policies because the operating costs of running the LA Metro system are increasing and we need to find new funding to keep up with maintenance demands. Furthermore, using UCLA’s research findings, I would support policies that encourage diverse housing types near transit systems, require higher percentages of affordable units in market-rate projects, expand rent controls to existing apartments, and implement rent controls in new apartments to help ensure that long-time residents are not forced to move out. I would also use my experiences from the Metro’s Public Safety Advisory Committee to help make the public transit system more equitable and just.”

KEYWORDS: accessibility, mobility, options

Q13 The Los Angeles Metro system serves millions of riders every month, with increases in ridership associated with the expansion of Metro stations. Access to public transportation is associated with less air and noise pollution, fewer harmful chemicals, and overall healthier communities. Yet, the Metro still faces public safety concerns, and expansion projects have encountered delays and cost increases while risking community displacement. What policies, if any, do you support regarding Los Angeles public transit infrastructure? Describe evidence that has informed these policies.

“I believe mobility is a civil rights issue. A safe, reliable public transit system connects people to jobs, education, healthcare, and opportunity, while reducing traffic and pollution. I support expanding Metro bus and rail service and increasing the frequency of buses and trains. I will also push for a universal TAP card across transit systems, fast underground Wi-Fi and cell service, cleaner and safer stations, and more than 500 miles of protected bike lanes. I support CEQA exemptions for bike lanes and light rail so good transportation projects can move faster. But expansion also requires accountability. Projects should have clear timelines and budgets, and state funding should prioritize improvements that actually increase reliability and ridership. Transit investments should also strengthen the communities they serve rather than displace them. I support building more affordable and workforce housing near major transit hubs while protecting existing renters from displacement. Los Angeles should have a world-class transportation system where people feel safe walking, biking, waiting for a bus, or riding Metro—and where getting around without a car is a practical option for every family.”

KEYWORDS: Transit Expansion, Safety, Reliability, Connectivity, Affordable Housing

Q7 Access to public transportation is associated with less air and noise pollution, fewer harmful chemicals, and overall healthier communities. However, many transit agencies, such as BART in the Bay Area, are facing financial deficits due to a decline in ridership. What policies, if any, do you support that would address California’s public transit infrastructure?

“It all comes down to ridership and transit agencies must be laser focused on the rider. There are 27 transit agencies in the Bay Area and for the past 10+ years, I have served and previously chaired two of them: Marin Transit and SMART. Coming out of the pandemic, both SMART and Marin Transit were #1 and #2 in the entire Bay Area for ridership return. How did we do it? The SMART train was still relatively new to passenger service and even with a tight budget and declining fare revenues during the pandemic, I led an effort to introduce free fares for youth and seniors. It was just too difficult and cumbersome to obtain a discounted clipper card and many simply chose not to ride because of the barriers. The free fare program was expected to result in even more lost fare revenue, but we actually saw fare revenues increase and ridership skyrocketed.”

KEYWORDS: seamless transit, free fares, SMART Train

Q13 The Los Angeles Metro system serves millions of riders every month, with increases in ridership associated with the expansion of Metro stations. Access to public transportation is associated with less air and noise pollution, fewer harmful chemicals, and overall healthier communities. Yet, the Metro still faces public safety concerns, and expansion projects have encountered delays and cost increases while risking community displacement. What policies, if any, do you support regarding Los Angeles public transit infrastructure? Describe evidence that has informed these policies.

“Metro’s ridership growth shows that when service expands, people use it. That should guide how we invest, but expansion has to be paired with safety, affordability, and anti-displacement protections, not treated separately from them.

As a board member of CicLAvia, I have seen firsthand what happens when streets are opened up for people instead of cars. Our open streets events consistently show that when Angelenos feel safe walking, biking, and moving through public space, they show up by the thousands, and that same principle applies to transit. Reliability and a sense of safety are what actually build ridership, not just new stations.

On safety, I support an array and alternative approaches that include safety presence, like transit ambassadors, mental health response teams, and better lit, better maintained stations, rather than relying on criminalization. Research and rider surveys, along with what I have observed through CicLAvia’s community engagement, show that visible presence and reliability build trust more than policing alone.

On expansion, delays and cost overruns are often the result of fragmented funding and permitting. I support dedicated, long term operating funding for Metro so projects are not repeatedly stalled or descoped, along with stronger project labor agreements to keep construction on track with good union jobs.

On displacement, the data is clear that new stations raise nearby rents. I support community perseveration, first right of refusal and prioritizing existing neighbors. Building affordable and social housing near transit before or alongside station openings, expanding community land trusts and tenant protections in station areas, and prioritizing public land for affordable development so residents can benefit from the transit investment in their own neighborhoods, rather than being pushed out by it.”

Q6 Distrust in science has been on the rise among the general public and policymakers, which has been associated with changes in federal funding for scientific research. In order to bridge this gap, how do you think scientists and policymakers can work together to strengthen their communication?

“As an educator, I have learned that giving people information is not the same as building understanding or trust. Scientists and policymakers need to communicate with people, not just at them. That means explaining research clearly, making information accessible in multiple languages and formats, and giving communities opportunities to ask questions and participate.

Scientists should be involved earlier in policymaking, not only after policies have already been developed. Policymakers also have a responsibility to listen to experts, understand the evidence, and be honest about what the science tells us, what remains uncertain, and where other considerations come into play.

Trust also depends on transparency. Scientists should be able to communicate findings without political interference, and policymakers should not cherry-pick evidence to support a preferred outcome. Stronger partnerships between universities, public agencies, schools, healthcare providers, and community organizations can also help trusted local voices communicate scientific information. As an educator, I would also like to see a stronger emphasis in our schools on recognizing and understanding the importance of primary sources and peer reviewed research, which I think is vital in this age of widespread dissemination of misinformation and disinformation.

Whether we are talking about wildfire, public health, water quality, climate change, or AI, good policy starts with credible evidence and meaningful community engagement.”

KEYWORDS: Transparency, Evidence Literacy, Community Engagement

Q6 Distrust in science has been on the rise among the general public and policymakers, which has been associated with changes in federal funding for scientific research. In order to bridge this gap, how do you think scientists and policymakers can work together to strengthen their communication?

“Trust grows when policymakers show their work. I come to every policy decision the same way: I meet with the experts and the people affected, take input from the community, and study a proposal in full, beyond what its backers present. That process changed my mind on Flock license plate cameras. I had spent years investing in modern public safety tools and initially saw them as another one. When I learned the data was being misused by federal and out-of-state agencies, and that the cameras’ accuracy and public safety benefits were unproven, I voted no. Public data builds trust too. As a councilmember, I helped create West Hollywood’s Climate Change Dashboard so residents could see our progress for themselves. In Sacramento, I’ll bring the same approach. I believe in coalition building from the start, which means bringing researchers and experts to the table before a bill is written, not after. Scientists can help by explaining findings in plain terms and engaging local officials directly, since that’s where much of this work gets implemented. With the Trump administration attacking science and slashing research funding, California needs leaders who make decisions based on evidence and say so publicly.”

Q6 Distrust in science has been on the rise among the general public and policymakers, which has been associated with changes in federal funding for scientific research. In order to bridge this gap, how do you think scientists and policymakers can work together to strengthen their communication?

“Trust is built through consistent, transparent engagement rather than occasional outreach. I would support embedding scientists in congressional offices and agencies through fellowship programs, so that policymakers have trusted expertise available when drafting legislation. Scientists, in turn, should communicate directly and explain how research affects daily life, from clean water to vaccines. It is the job of the congressmember to make sure constituents have access to these open dialogues. Local engagement matters. Universities and laboratories in Los Angeles should host community forums, bringing researchers face to face with residents. Stable, predictable research funding also signals that science is a public good rather than a political target, and it allows scientists to focus on discovery rather than advocacy.”

KEYWORDS: education, reliance, future

Q6 Distrust in science has been on the rise among the general public and policymakers, which has been associated with changes in federal funding for scientific research. In order to bridge this gap, how do you think scientists and policymakers can work together to strengthen their communication?

“Science should play an important role in policymaking, but building public trust takes more than presenting people with facts. It requires real communication between scientists, policymakers, and the communities affected by our decisions.

I believe scientists should be brought into the policymaking process earlier. California has some of the best universities, research institutions, and scientific experts in the world, and lawmakers should be using that expertise when developing policy. Scientists should also be able to communicate what the research tells us, what it does not tell us, and where there is still uncertainty.

Just as importantly, policymakers and researchers need to listen to residents, workers, patients, farmers, teachers, and others who understand firsthand how policies affect their communities. Public hearings, community forums, and advisory panels can help bring those perspectives into the process.

Policymakers should be transparent about how scientific evidence informed a decision while recognizing that they must also weigh costs, benefits, and competing community needs. Good policy comes from using the best available evidence, listening to people, and being honest about how decisions are made.”

KEYWORDS: Science, Transparency, Community Input, Collaboration, Public Trust

Q6 Distrust in science has been on the rise among the general public and policymakers, which has been associated with changes in federal funding for scientific research. In order to bridge this gap, how do you think scientists and policymakers can work together to strengthen their communication?

“Distrust in science rarely comes from the data itself; it comes from people feeling like science is handed down rather than communicated with them, especially in communities that have historically been ignored or mistreated by institutions. As a community health worker during COVID, I saw this directly: accurate information didn’t spread through press releases, it spread through promotoras and community messengers people already trusted.

Policymakers should be investing in that kind of infrastructure permanently, not just during emergencies. That means sustained funding for community health workers and culturally and linguistically specific outreach organizations who can translate scientific findings into terms that are relevant to people’s daily lives and concerns.

Scientists also need real pathways into the legislative process, not just as occasional expert witnesses, but embedded in policy development from the start, so research informs policy before decisions are made rather than justifying them afterward. I’d support expanding legislative fellowship programs that place scientists directly in the Capitol.

Finally, when federal research funding is cut or politicized, California should be prepared to backfill it. Protecting scientific research from partisan swings is itself a form of communication: it tells the public that evidence matters regardless of who’s in power.”

Q6 Distrust in science has been on the rise among the general public and policymakers, which has been associated with changes in federal funding for scientific research. In order to bridge this gap, how do you think scientists and policymakers can work together to strengthen their communication?

“While there may be some growing distrust in science in some pockets, here in California and especially in our local communities, I continue to see an even stronger passion and commitment by many to stand up, fight back, and advocate. Rather than give up and give way to some of the national rhetoric, I see an opportunity to continue to mobilize and double down on our values. As a policymaker, I will continue to engage with our scientists and give them a platform and a voice.”

KEYWORDS: trust the science, follow the science

Q6 Distrust in science has been on the rise among the general public and policymakers, which has been associated with changes in federal funding for scientific research. In order to bridge this gap, how do you think scientists and policymakers can work together to strengthen their communication?

“Distrust in science grows when people only hear from researchers after a crisis, not throughout the process. I believe scientists and policymakers need standing, ongoing relationships, not just emergency briefings during outbreaks or disasters.

As State Senator, I would support embedding scientists and public health experts directly into legislative committee work, not just as occasional witnesses, so policy is shaped by evidence from the start. I also support state funded science communication and public education campaigns delivered by trusted local messengers, including community clinics, schools, and faith organizations, since trust often depends on the messenger as much as the message.

Given deep federal cuts to NIH, NSF, and other research funding, I support California stepping in to backfill critical research dollars, particularly for public health and disaster research that cannot afford to wait. Protecting the researchers, postdocs, and academic workers who do this work is part of protecting the research itself.

Ultimately, rebuilding trust requires transparency. Policymakers should explain the evidence behind decisions plainly and consistently, and scientists should be present in community conversations year-round, not only when something goes wrong.”