Created by the Kentucky Stance on Science team. Please contact kasprkentucky@gmail.com with any questions.
Last updated: October 15, 2026
Kentucky will face many challenges in the coming years, and it is increasingly critical that our policymakers understand the importance of evidence-based decision-making. The goals of this resource are to:
Through Stance on Science, we hope to help Kentuckians understand how their elected representatives will utilize science to improve the state that they love. Learn more about this initiative on the home page.
This webpage houses the responses to 4 questions crafted by the Kentucky Stance on Science team.
Candidates were contacted beginning in August 2026 and given the opportunity to answer all questions. Only the responses candidates submitted are included, and none were modified before publication.
For the November 2026 General Election, candidates in the following elections were contacted1:
1 Responses from primary candidates who did not advance remain available through the “Show primary candidates” control.
The responses of candidates shared on this webpage do not reflect the views of the Kentucky Stance on Science team or the Scientist Network for Advancing Policy (SNAP) Coalition. SNAP is a non-partisan organization (please see more about SNAP here). SNAP and the Kentucky Stance on Science team do not endorse any candidates. The goals of this initiative can be found here. Please contact kasprkentucky@gmail.com with any questions.
To find your districts for state and federal races and see who is on your ballot, please visit the Kentucky Voter Information Portal (VIP).
If you cannot find a candidate, it means they have not yet submitted their response to Stance on Science. Please check back soon.
The order of responses is randomized by default. Use the filters below to find the candidate and race you are interested in.
Q1 Obesity and diabetes is a rising concern throughout the nation and Kentucky consistently ranks among the least healthy states (i.e. ranked 5th in citizens with diabetes). What evidence-based policies, if any, do you support to improve community and preventative health for your constituents (e.g. Type II diabetes, Heart Disease, Obesity)?
As a Type 1 diabetic who’s had to ration my insulin in order to have enough money to feed my daughters, I understand the struggles Kentuckians face every single day. Healthcare is a human right. No one should have to ration their medicine, skip a doctor’s appointment, or choose between paying a medical bill or putting food on the table. We need to make healthcare more affordable for every Kentuckian. We need to restore the Affordable Care Act subsidies, provide additional options for access to health insurance, lower prescription drug costs, and restore the devastating cuts to Medicaid threatening to close dozens of rural hospitals across Kentucky and even more across the country.
Q2 Kentucky faces significant ongoing environmental challenges which includes coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage contaminating groundwater and streams. What policies, if any, would you implement to address Kentucky’s water quality degradation, and why?
Every Kentuckian deserves access to clean drinking water. We need to make sure we direct federal resources into our communities to address the damage done to our groundwater and streams. When I served as Director of Administrative Services at the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife, I saw firsthand the impact of water pollution and was left especially motivated to combat it.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
Kentuckians deserve to know how data centers will impact their utility bills, environment, and their communities. It’s why I support a national moratorium on all new AI data center construction until we fully understand the impact on our health, environment, water supply, and utility bills. We must ensure that existing data centers pay the full costs for the impact on our electric bills and pass legislation to limit the impact of data centers on our environment and natural resources.
Q4 Vaccine hesitency and public skepticism about the safety of medical treatments have contributed to falling vaccination rates.. A recent Health Alert Network (HAN) Health Advisory from the CDC highlighted Kentucky has only 43.8 % of individuals aged 18 and above recieved a flu vaccination. What policies, if any, would you implement to help Kentucky manage infectious diseases for which there are safe and effective vaccines?
Access to healthcare remains a barrier to trusting healthcare professionals. Surprise medical bills, lost coverage, closed hospitals. All of this can breed mistrust and skepticism of healthcare professionals and lead to lower vaccination rates. I believe healthcare is a human right and improving the access, affordability, and quality of care will help us improve community trust. This means restoring funding to Medicaid and the ACA while providing options for accessing and affording the same type of high-quality care people like Mitch McConnell receive.
Q1 Obesity and diabetes is a rising concern throughout the nation and Kentucky consistently ranks among the least healthy states (i.e. ranked 5th in citizens with diabetes). What evidence-based policies, if any, do you support to improve community and preventative health for your constituents (e.g. Type II diabetes, Heart Disease, Obesity)?
Obesity and diabetes are growing crises, and Kentucky is hit hard—ranked 5th in the nation for diabetes. I support prevention over treatment. Key policies: expand nutrition education, increase access to fresh food, invest in walkable communities, and strengthen school wellness programs. We must also support preventive care through Medicaid and community health workers. Healthcare should be available to all. By focusing on prevention, we can reduce chronic disease, improve lives, and lower long-term costs.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
Clean water is essential to life, and Kentucky’s communities deserve better than contaminated groundwater and streams from coal ash and acid mine drainage. I believe we should leverage the AI and data center boom—not just for growth, but for good. These multibillion-dollar investments can and should help clean up our legacy pollution. Let’s repurpose brownfield sites into offsite solar farms to power these facilities, turning environmental liabilities into clean energy assets. This isn’t just cleanup—it’s smart economic development. We can create jobs, generate revenue, and restore our land and water for future generations.
Q4 Vaccine hesitency and public skepticism about the safety of medical treatments have contributed to falling vaccination rates.. A recent Health Alert Network (HAN) Health Advisory from the CDC highlighted Kentucky has only 43.8 % of individuals aged 18 and above recieved a flu vaccination. What policies, if any, would you implement to help Kentucky manage infectious diseases for which there are safe and effective vaccines?
Vaccine hesitancy is a serious public health challenge—especially in Kentucky, where only 43.8% of adults received a flu vaccine last year. To protect our communities, we must fight misinformation with trusted education. I support community-based public health campaigns that provide accurate, accessible information about vaccine safety and effectiveness. These programs should be led by local healthcare providers, faith leaders, and educators who people already trust. We should also partner with schools, clinics, and pharmacies to make vaccination easy and routine. When people have the facts, they make better choices. Education—not mandates—is the key to rebuilding confidence and stopping preventable outbreaks.
Q1 Obesity and diabetes is a rising concern throughout the nation and Kentucky consistently ranks among the least healthy states (i.e. ranked 5th in citizens with diabetes). What evidence-based policies, if any, do you support to improve community and preventative health for your constituents (e.g. Type II diabetes, Heart Disease, Obesity)?
Obesity is no doubt, a combination of diet, exercise, DNA. Much can be said about diabetes and heart disease too. On the one hand, I firmly disagree with the RFK Junior’s school of thought that pedals every imaginable snake oil to solve medical problems. The human body is a chemical engine. Therefore, we must understand all of its parts from a scientific point of view as well as how they relate with each other. Personally, I prefer to see more farmers markets, more fresh fruits, and vegetables, grown in Kentucky, landing on our meal plates. Less processed food is no doubt the better road to travel. Kentucky has a very unique mountain culture from the 37 eastern counties. Our ancestors maximized the use of the land for centuries and funny enough that diet was extremely healthy. Our modern diet might taste good because it’s loaded with sugar, but health wise it totally sucks. More to the point one of my main campaign pillars is that I advocate for a new medical approach addition to our nationwide system of healthcare. We need free preventive healthcare screening for all of our citizens. This can be paid for by Medicare, Medicaid and insurance policies, but ultimately the federal government has to look after the health of our citizens. My program basically says let’s get anyone who has any reason to believe whatsoever that they have an issue to go see a doctor for an examination and diagnosis which will be free. Why? If we catch disease early and can prevent it and or cure it, which is much more likely at an early stage then all of the really bad and expensive ramifications on the backend can be avoided. The basic example is changing the oil in your car. If you do not change that oil and or add oil at some point that engine is gonna freeze up, perhaps explode and turn a $20-$30 oil job into a total loss for that automobile. The human body is no different. So in scientific terms, the answer is, we must follow the evidence that all of our scientific avenues are able to turn up regarding the human body and this maintenance. The most common example on this free preventive healthcare question is of course something like cancer. Cancer is caught at stage one chances of beating that cancer and living at least the normal average lifespan is pretty certain however, if that cancer is not called early say not until stage three or four then often the patient has a few months to live. The system must be retold to prevent harm and not just to try to hopelessly repair harm that has already taken its toll.
Q2 Kentucky faces significant ongoing environmental challenges which includes coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage contaminating groundwater and streams. What policies, if any, would you implement to address Kentucky’s water quality degradation, and why?
I finally believe that we must reforest and re-wild the land that we call Kentucky. Nature has blessed us with some of the best natural resources in the country, but they either go unnoticed, abused, or simply not looked after in a proper way. So the simple answer is we must use federal resources to clean up all waterways, all forests and all parts of the state specifically. Why? The list of benefits from a healthy land touches every part of our lives. It would take all day to list the benefits derived from reforesting, rewilding and cleaning up the natural environment, but it only takes one or two sentences to describe what happens if we don’t. Look around the galaxy and the universe. Do we see life on barren planets? Obviously no so the fate of our environment and planet is the fate of humanity. Clean it or lose it.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
I have a page on my campaign website, devoted to data centers. It would be a wise idea to at least listen to the short video on that particular page. But the basic idea is Kentucky is the wrong place for data centers. They don’t produce lasting jobs. They consume huge amounts of water and electricity. Animal populations are badly impacted. This whole data center industry is the main reason why utility bills are going through the roof across the country. Data centers can be made smaller. Every home computer can be turned into a micro data center. See my video link for more analysis. https://www.robertquigleyforcongress.com/data-centers
Q4 Vaccine hesitency and public skepticism about the safety of medical treatments have contributed to falling vaccination rates.. A recent Health Alert Network (HAN) Health Advisory from the CDC highlighted Kentucky has only 43.8 % of individuals aged 18 and above recieved a flu vaccination. What policies, if any, would you implement to help Kentucky manage infectious diseases for which there are safe and effective vaccines?
First RFK Junior is a total whack job. Generally speaking, why would anybody not use modern advances in medicine a.k.a. vaccines and treatments to improve the chemical engine that we call the human body. It makes no sense to me. I think there’s a great deal of recent confusion because of Covid. Let me explain.
In 2020 just as Covid was raging in China and beginning its spread around the world I was at a business meeting with one of my associates, whose family owns a fireworks factory just outside of Wuhan. Within a few days me and a couple of friends that hung out after the meeting came down with the worst flu that we had ever had in our entire lives. To make a long story short, we had contracted Covid. I also contracted it two more times over the next seven or eight months with the Infection being about 50% less severe then the previous infection. Then all of a sudden there was no more infection. During this whole time neither my wife nor our four dogs nor the inside cat nor the dozens of outside community cats came down with Covid. We never took the vaccine, but in our case, the issue was very simple. Why take a vaccine when our natural bodies were able to handle the virus? My wife never even had a sniffling nose nor a cough or a sneeze so some people have natural immunity and others do not. As it turns out people who died almost without exception, had a compromised immune system in some form or fashion or another. Or they just simply had the wrong DNA in relation to that virus.
Now this happened to millions of people and we know that the human body has the potential to carry defenses to covid.
The problem is taking this one example and then saying all vaccines are bad is ridiculous. Both the geological DNA evidence as well as all of the data that was collected around the world during the latest outbreak tells us a science based story.
It also didn’t help matters that the Covid vaccine seemed to have been rushed through a process that normally takes 20 years and it was pressed into service in a few months. So on the one hand it is very natural to understand the publics suspicion of modern medicine. But the reality is, we should have faith and confidence in our medical institutions. They might be too expensive and they might be provided with incorrect delivery processes, but they are making great progress managing our chemical engines a.k.a. our bodies.
In terms of policy choices then the group of vaccines that I took as a young boy born in 1966 should absolutely be mandatory. Of course, once a person turns 18 it is their life and hence their decision. But the evidence of our own lives shows that childhood vaccines have extended life and prevented a huge amount of illness.
Q1 Obesity and diabetes is a rising concern throughout the nation and Kentucky consistently ranks among the least healthy states (i.e. ranked 5th in citizens with diabetes). What evidence-based policies, if any, do you support to improve community and preventative health for your constituents (e.g. Type II diabetes, Heart Disease, Obesity)?
Improving community and preventative health is a top priority, starting with a tiered approach that addresses immediate nutritional needs and long-term healthy habits. To combat rising rates of obesity and diabetes in Kentucky, I support the following evidence-based policies:
Q2 Kentucky faces significant ongoing environmental challenges which includes coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage contaminating groundwater and streams. What policies, if any, would you implement to address Kentucky’s water quality degradation, and why?
Addressing Kentucky’s water quality degradation, particularly the contamination from coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage, requires a commitment to evidence-based governance and technical precision. My policy approach centers on the belief that we must ensure we have dedicated experts in these fields on staff to manage these complex environmental threats. While I am clear on the end result we must accomplish—clean, safe groundwater and streams for every Kentuckian—I recognize that achieving this requires a team of specialists to ensure we are giving our Commonwealth the best possible chance at a successful recovery.
To effectively address these challenges, I would implement the following policy framework:
Ultimately, protecting our water is about protecting the health and economic future of Kentucky families. By empowering a team of experts to guide our regulatory and restoration efforts, we can move past political rhetoric and deliver the practical, science-based solutions our communities deserve.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
We need to focus on the actual issues behind the data center conversations, and that starts with a commitment to open and transparent governance when it comes to data center contracts. These projects often involve foreign interests and massive corporate giveaways that have been forced into Kentucky communities without ratepayer protections or public input.
I support policies that prioritize community-led decision-making and mandatory disclosure regarding what these data centers are for. We are not anti-technology, but we are pro-communities making their own decisions about their resources. For too long, the people who have to live with these projects, our workers, farmers, and local leaders, have been excluded from the process. These policies are right for Kentucky because they shift the focus back to public interest and ensure that any development deliver real benefits, respect our community, and improve our quality of life rather than just serving special interests.
Q4 Vaccine hesitency and public skepticism about the safety of medical treatments have contributed to falling vaccination rates.. A recent Health Alert Network (HAN) Health Advisory from the CDC highlighted Kentucky has only 43.8 % of individuals aged 18 and above recieved a flu vaccination. What policies, if any, would you implement to help Kentucky manage infectious diseases for which there are safe and effective vaccines?
I believe healthcare is a fundamental right. To combat falling vaccination rates and manage infectious diseases effectively, my policy platform focuses on expanding healthcare access and restoring trust through equitable, community-driven care. If elected to Congress, I would advocate for the following:
Pick a topic to see how every candidate answered the related question(s), then optionally narrow by race.
Select a topic above to see the candidate responses.
Q2 Kentucky faces significant ongoing environmental challenges which includes coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage contaminating groundwater and streams. What policies, if any, would you implement to address Kentucky’s water quality degradation, and why?
Every Kentuckian deserves access to clean drinking water. We need to make sure we direct federal resources into our communities to address the damage done to our groundwater and streams. When I served as Director of Administrative Services at the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife, I saw firsthand the impact of water pollution and was left especially motivated to combat it.
Q2 Kentucky faces significant ongoing environmental challenges which includes coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage contaminating groundwater and streams. What policies, if any, would you implement to address Kentucky’s water quality degradation, and why?
I finally believe that we must reforest and re-wild the land that we call Kentucky. Nature has blessed us with some of the best natural resources in the country, but they either go unnoticed, abused, or simply not looked after in a proper way. So the simple answer is we must use federal resources to clean up all waterways, all forests and all parts of the state specifically. Why? The list of benefits from a healthy land touches every part of our lives. It would take all day to list the benefits derived from reforesting, rewilding and cleaning up the natural environment, but it only takes one or two sentences to describe what happens if we don’t. Look around the galaxy and the universe. Do we see life on barren planets? Obviously no so the fate of our environment and planet is the fate of humanity. Clean it or lose it.
Q2 Kentucky faces significant ongoing environmental challenges which includes coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage contaminating groundwater and streams. What policies, if any, would you implement to address Kentucky’s water quality degradation, and why?
Addressing Kentucky’s water quality degradation, particularly the contamination from coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage, requires a commitment to evidence-based governance and technical precision. My policy approach centers on the belief that we must ensure we have dedicated experts in these fields on staff to manage these complex environmental threats. While I am clear on the end result we must accomplish—clean, safe groundwater and streams for every Kentuckian—I recognize that achieving this requires a team of specialists to ensure we are giving our Commonwealth the best possible chance at a successful recovery.
To effectively address these challenges, I would implement the following policy framework:
Ultimately, protecting our water is about protecting the health and economic future of Kentucky families. By empowering a team of experts to guide our regulatory and restoration efforts, we can move past political rhetoric and deliver the practical, science-based solutions our communities deserve.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
Kentuckians deserve to know how data centers will impact their utility bills, environment, and their communities. It’s why I support a national moratorium on all new AI data center construction until we fully understand the impact on our health, environment, water supply, and utility bills. We must ensure that existing data centers pay the full costs for the impact on our electric bills and pass legislation to limit the impact of data centers on our environment and natural resources.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
Clean water is essential to life, and Kentucky’s communities deserve better than contaminated groundwater and streams from coal ash and acid mine drainage. I believe we should leverage the AI and data center boom—not just for growth, but for good. These multibillion-dollar investments can and should help clean up our legacy pollution. Let’s repurpose brownfield sites into offsite solar farms to power these facilities, turning environmental liabilities into clean energy assets. This isn’t just cleanup—it’s smart economic development. We can create jobs, generate revenue, and restore our land and water for future generations.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
I have a page on my campaign website, devoted to data centers. It would be a wise idea to at least listen to the short video on that particular page. But the basic idea is Kentucky is the wrong place for data centers. They don’t produce lasting jobs. They consume huge amounts of water and electricity. Animal populations are badly impacted. This whole data center industry is the main reason why utility bills are going through the roof across the country. Data centers can be made smaller. Every home computer can be turned into a micro data center. See my video link for more analysis. https://www.robertquigleyforcongress.com/data-centers
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
We need to focus on the actual issues behind the data center conversations, and that starts with a commitment to open and transparent governance when it comes to data center contracts. These projects often involve foreign interests and massive corporate giveaways that have been forced into Kentucky communities without ratepayer protections or public input.
I support policies that prioritize community-led decision-making and mandatory disclosure regarding what these data centers are for. We are not anti-technology, but we are pro-communities making their own decisions about their resources. For too long, the people who have to live with these projects, our workers, farmers, and local leaders, have been excluded from the process. These policies are right for Kentucky because they shift the focus back to public interest and ensure that any development deliver real benefits, respect our community, and improve our quality of life rather than just serving special interests.
Q2 Kentucky faces significant ongoing environmental challenges which includes coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage contaminating groundwater and streams. What policies, if any, would you implement to address Kentucky’s water quality degradation, and why?
Every Kentuckian deserves access to clean drinking water. We need to make sure we direct federal resources into our communities to address the damage done to our groundwater and streams. When I served as Director of Administrative Services at the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife, I saw firsthand the impact of water pollution and was left especially motivated to combat it.
Q2 Kentucky faces significant ongoing environmental challenges which includes coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage contaminating groundwater and streams. What policies, if any, would you implement to address Kentucky’s water quality degradation, and why?
I finally believe that we must reforest and re-wild the land that we call Kentucky. Nature has blessed us with some of the best natural resources in the country, but they either go unnoticed, abused, or simply not looked after in a proper way. So the simple answer is we must use federal resources to clean up all waterways, all forests and all parts of the state specifically. Why? The list of benefits from a healthy land touches every part of our lives. It would take all day to list the benefits derived from reforesting, rewilding and cleaning up the natural environment, but it only takes one or two sentences to describe what happens if we don’t. Look around the galaxy and the universe. Do we see life on barren planets? Obviously no so the fate of our environment and planet is the fate of humanity. Clean it or lose it.
Q2 Kentucky faces significant ongoing environmental challenges which includes coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage contaminating groundwater and streams. What policies, if any, would you implement to address Kentucky’s water quality degradation, and why?
Addressing Kentucky’s water quality degradation, particularly the contamination from coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage, requires a commitment to evidence-based governance and technical precision. My policy approach centers on the belief that we must ensure we have dedicated experts in these fields on staff to manage these complex environmental threats. While I am clear on the end result we must accomplish—clean, safe groundwater and streams for every Kentuckian—I recognize that achieving this requires a team of specialists to ensure we are giving our Commonwealth the best possible chance at a successful recovery.
To effectively address these challenges, I would implement the following policy framework:
Ultimately, protecting our water is about protecting the health and economic future of Kentucky families. By empowering a team of experts to guide our regulatory and restoration efforts, we can move past political rhetoric and deliver the practical, science-based solutions our communities deserve.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
Kentuckians deserve to know how data centers will impact their utility bills, environment, and their communities. It’s why I support a national moratorium on all new AI data center construction until we fully understand the impact on our health, environment, water supply, and utility bills. We must ensure that existing data centers pay the full costs for the impact on our electric bills and pass legislation to limit the impact of data centers on our environment and natural resources.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
Clean water is essential to life, and Kentucky’s communities deserve better than contaminated groundwater and streams from coal ash and acid mine drainage. I believe we should leverage the AI and data center boom—not just for growth, but for good. These multibillion-dollar investments can and should help clean up our legacy pollution. Let’s repurpose brownfield sites into offsite solar farms to power these facilities, turning environmental liabilities into clean energy assets. This isn’t just cleanup—it’s smart economic development. We can create jobs, generate revenue, and restore our land and water for future generations.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
I have a page on my campaign website, devoted to data centers. It would be a wise idea to at least listen to the short video on that particular page. But the basic idea is Kentucky is the wrong place for data centers. They don’t produce lasting jobs. They consume huge amounts of water and electricity. Animal populations are badly impacted. This whole data center industry is the main reason why utility bills are going through the roof across the country. Data centers can be made smaller. Every home computer can be turned into a micro data center. See my video link for more analysis. https://www.robertquigleyforcongress.com/data-centers
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
We need to focus on the actual issues behind the data center conversations, and that starts with a commitment to open and transparent governance when it comes to data center contracts. These projects often involve foreign interests and massive corporate giveaways that have been forced into Kentucky communities without ratepayer protections or public input.
I support policies that prioritize community-led decision-making and mandatory disclosure regarding what these data centers are for. We are not anti-technology, but we are pro-communities making their own decisions about their resources. For too long, the people who have to live with these projects, our workers, farmers, and local leaders, have been excluded from the process. These policies are right for Kentucky because they shift the focus back to public interest and ensure that any development deliver real benefits, respect our community, and improve our quality of life rather than just serving special interests.
Q2 Kentucky faces significant ongoing environmental challenges which includes coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage contaminating groundwater and streams. What policies, if any, would you implement to address Kentucky’s water quality degradation, and why?
Every Kentuckian deserves access to clean drinking water. We need to make sure we direct federal resources into our communities to address the damage done to our groundwater and streams. When I served as Director of Administrative Services at the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife, I saw firsthand the impact of water pollution and was left especially motivated to combat it.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
Kentuckians deserve to know how data centers will impact their utility bills, environment, and their communities. It’s why I support a national moratorium on all new AI data center construction until we fully understand the impact on our health, environment, water supply, and utility bills. We must ensure that existing data centers pay the full costs for the impact on our electric bills and pass legislation to limit the impact of data centers on our environment and natural resources.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
Clean water is essential to life, and Kentucky’s communities deserve better than contaminated groundwater and streams from coal ash and acid mine drainage. I believe we should leverage the AI and data center boom—not just for growth, but for good. These multibillion-dollar investments can and should help clean up our legacy pollution. Let’s repurpose brownfield sites into offsite solar farms to power these facilities, turning environmental liabilities into clean energy assets. This isn’t just cleanup—it’s smart economic development. We can create jobs, generate revenue, and restore our land and water for future generations.
Q2 Kentucky faces significant ongoing environmental challenges which includes coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage contaminating groundwater and streams. What policies, if any, would you implement to address Kentucky’s water quality degradation, and why?
I finally believe that we must reforest and re-wild the land that we call Kentucky. Nature has blessed us with some of the best natural resources in the country, but they either go unnoticed, abused, or simply not looked after in a proper way. So the simple answer is we must use federal resources to clean up all waterways, all forests and all parts of the state specifically. Why? The list of benefits from a healthy land touches every part of our lives. It would take all day to list the benefits derived from reforesting, rewilding and cleaning up the natural environment, but it only takes one or two sentences to describe what happens if we don’t. Look around the galaxy and the universe. Do we see life on barren planets? Obviously no so the fate of our environment and planet is the fate of humanity. Clean it or lose it.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
I have a page on my campaign website, devoted to data centers. It would be a wise idea to at least listen to the short video on that particular page. But the basic idea is Kentucky is the wrong place for data centers. They don’t produce lasting jobs. They consume huge amounts of water and electricity. Animal populations are badly impacted. This whole data center industry is the main reason why utility bills are going through the roof across the country. Data centers can be made smaller. Every home computer can be turned into a micro data center. See my video link for more analysis. https://www.robertquigleyforcongress.com/data-centers
Q2 Kentucky faces significant ongoing environmental challenges which includes coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage contaminating groundwater and streams. What policies, if any, would you implement to address Kentucky’s water quality degradation, and why?
Addressing Kentucky’s water quality degradation, particularly the contamination from coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage, requires a commitment to evidence-based governance and technical precision. My policy approach centers on the belief that we must ensure we have dedicated experts in these fields on staff to manage these complex environmental threats. While I am clear on the end result we must accomplish—clean, safe groundwater and streams for every Kentuckian—I recognize that achieving this requires a team of specialists to ensure we are giving our Commonwealth the best possible chance at a successful recovery.
To effectively address these challenges, I would implement the following policy framework:
Ultimately, protecting our water is about protecting the health and economic future of Kentucky families. By empowering a team of experts to guide our regulatory and restoration efforts, we can move past political rhetoric and deliver the practical, science-based solutions our communities deserve.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
We need to focus on the actual issues behind the data center conversations, and that starts with a commitment to open and transparent governance when it comes to data center contracts. These projects often involve foreign interests and massive corporate giveaways that have been forced into Kentucky communities without ratepayer protections or public input.
I support policies that prioritize community-led decision-making and mandatory disclosure regarding what these data centers are for. We are not anti-technology, but we are pro-communities making their own decisions about their resources. For too long, the people who have to live with these projects, our workers, farmers, and local leaders, have been excluded from the process. These policies are right for Kentucky because they shift the focus back to public interest and ensure that any development deliver real benefits, respect our community, and improve our quality of life rather than just serving special interests.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
Kentuckians deserve to know how data centers will impact their utility bills, environment, and their communities. It’s why I support a national moratorium on all new AI data center construction until we fully understand the impact on our health, environment, water supply, and utility bills. We must ensure that existing data centers pay the full costs for the impact on our electric bills and pass legislation to limit the impact of data centers on our environment and natural resources.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
Clean water is essential to life, and Kentucky’s communities deserve better than contaminated groundwater and streams from coal ash and acid mine drainage. I believe we should leverage the AI and data center boom—not just for growth, but for good. These multibillion-dollar investments can and should help clean up our legacy pollution. Let’s repurpose brownfield sites into offsite solar farms to power these facilities, turning environmental liabilities into clean energy assets. This isn’t just cleanup—it’s smart economic development. We can create jobs, generate revenue, and restore our land and water for future generations.
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
I have a page on my campaign website, devoted to data centers. It would be a wise idea to at least listen to the short video on that particular page. But the basic idea is Kentucky is the wrong place for data centers. They don’t produce lasting jobs. They consume huge amounts of water and electricity. Animal populations are badly impacted. This whole data center industry is the main reason why utility bills are going through the roof across the country. Data centers can be made smaller. Every home computer can be turned into a micro data center. See my video link for more analysis. https://www.robertquigleyforcongress.com/data-centers
Q3 Kentucky is actively pursuing AI datacenter construction projects, and already has 37 such facilities throughout the state. Datacenters are central to domestic AI development and bring construction jobs, but can strain limited resources, harm the environment, and often face public opposition. What policies, if any, do you support related to datacenter development projects, and why are these policies right for Kentucky?
We need to focus on the actual issues behind the data center conversations, and that starts with a commitment to open and transparent governance when it comes to data center contracts. These projects often involve foreign interests and massive corporate giveaways that have been forced into Kentucky communities without ratepayer protections or public input.
I support policies that prioritize community-led decision-making and mandatory disclosure regarding what these data centers are for. We are not anti-technology, but we are pro-communities making their own decisions about their resources. For too long, the people who have to live with these projects, our workers, farmers, and local leaders, have been excluded from the process. These policies are right for Kentucky because they shift the focus back to public interest and ensure that any development deliver real benefits, respect our community, and improve our quality of life rather than just serving special interests.
Q1 Obesity and diabetes is a rising concern throughout the nation and Kentucky consistently ranks among the least healthy states (i.e. ranked 5th in citizens with diabetes). What evidence-based policies, if any, do you support to improve community and preventative health for your constituents (e.g. Type II diabetes, Heart Disease, Obesity)?
As a Type 1 diabetic who’s had to ration my insulin in order to have enough money to feed my daughters, I understand the struggles Kentuckians face every single day. Healthcare is a human right. No one should have to ration their medicine, skip a doctor’s appointment, or choose between paying a medical bill or putting food on the table. We need to make healthcare more affordable for every Kentuckian. We need to restore the Affordable Care Act subsidies, provide additional options for access to health insurance, lower prescription drug costs, and restore the devastating cuts to Medicaid threatening to close dozens of rural hospitals across Kentucky and even more across the country.
Q4 Vaccine hesitency and public skepticism about the safety of medical treatments have contributed to falling vaccination rates.. A recent Health Alert Network (HAN) Health Advisory from the CDC highlighted Kentucky has only 43.8 % of individuals aged 18 and above recieved a flu vaccination. What policies, if any, would you implement to help Kentucky manage infectious diseases for which there are safe and effective vaccines?
Access to healthcare remains a barrier to trusting healthcare professionals. Surprise medical bills, lost coverage, closed hospitals. All of this can breed mistrust and skepticism of healthcare professionals and lead to lower vaccination rates. I believe healthcare is a human right and improving the access, affordability, and quality of care will help us improve community trust. This means restoring funding to Medicaid and the ACA while providing options for accessing and affording the same type of high-quality care people like Mitch McConnell receive.
Q1 Obesity and diabetes is a rising concern throughout the nation and Kentucky consistently ranks among the least healthy states (i.e. ranked 5th in citizens with diabetes). What evidence-based policies, if any, do you support to improve community and preventative health for your constituents (e.g. Type II diabetes, Heart Disease, Obesity)?
Obesity and diabetes are growing crises, and Kentucky is hit hard—ranked 5th in the nation for diabetes. I support prevention over treatment. Key policies: expand nutrition education, increase access to fresh food, invest in walkable communities, and strengthen school wellness programs. We must also support preventive care through Medicaid and community health workers. Healthcare should be available to all. By focusing on prevention, we can reduce chronic disease, improve lives, and lower long-term costs.
Q4 Vaccine hesitency and public skepticism about the safety of medical treatments have contributed to falling vaccination rates.. A recent Health Alert Network (HAN) Health Advisory from the CDC highlighted Kentucky has only 43.8 % of individuals aged 18 and above recieved a flu vaccination. What policies, if any, would you implement to help Kentucky manage infectious diseases for which there are safe and effective vaccines?
Vaccine hesitancy is a serious public health challenge—especially in Kentucky, where only 43.8% of adults received a flu vaccine last year. To protect our communities, we must fight misinformation with trusted education. I support community-based public health campaigns that provide accurate, accessible information about vaccine safety and effectiveness. These programs should be led by local healthcare providers, faith leaders, and educators who people already trust. We should also partner with schools, clinics, and pharmacies to make vaccination easy and routine. When people have the facts, they make better choices. Education—not mandates—is the key to rebuilding confidence and stopping preventable outbreaks.
Q1 Obesity and diabetes is a rising concern throughout the nation and Kentucky consistently ranks among the least healthy states (i.e. ranked 5th in citizens with diabetes). What evidence-based policies, if any, do you support to improve community and preventative health for your constituents (e.g. Type II diabetes, Heart Disease, Obesity)?
Obesity is no doubt, a combination of diet, exercise, DNA. Much can be said about diabetes and heart disease too. On the one hand, I firmly disagree with the RFK Junior’s school of thought that pedals every imaginable snake oil to solve medical problems. The human body is a chemical engine. Therefore, we must understand all of its parts from a scientific point of view as well as how they relate with each other. Personally, I prefer to see more farmers markets, more fresh fruits, and vegetables, grown in Kentucky, landing on our meal plates. Less processed food is no doubt the better road to travel. Kentucky has a very unique mountain culture from the 37 eastern counties. Our ancestors maximized the use of the land for centuries and funny enough that diet was extremely healthy. Our modern diet might taste good because it’s loaded with sugar, but health wise it totally sucks. More to the point one of my main campaign pillars is that I advocate for a new medical approach addition to our nationwide system of healthcare. We need free preventive healthcare screening for all of our citizens. This can be paid for by Medicare, Medicaid and insurance policies, but ultimately the federal government has to look after the health of our citizens. My program basically says let’s get anyone who has any reason to believe whatsoever that they have an issue to go see a doctor for an examination and diagnosis which will be free. Why? If we catch disease early and can prevent it and or cure it, which is much more likely at an early stage then all of the really bad and expensive ramifications on the backend can be avoided. The basic example is changing the oil in your car. If you do not change that oil and or add oil at some point that engine is gonna freeze up, perhaps explode and turn a $20-$30 oil job into a total loss for that automobile. The human body is no different. So in scientific terms, the answer is, we must follow the evidence that all of our scientific avenues are able to turn up regarding the human body and this maintenance. The most common example on this free preventive healthcare question is of course something like cancer. Cancer is caught at stage one chances of beating that cancer and living at least the normal average lifespan is pretty certain however, if that cancer is not called early say not until stage three or four then often the patient has a few months to live. The system must be retold to prevent harm and not just to try to hopelessly repair harm that has already taken its toll.
Q4 Vaccine hesitency and public skepticism about the safety of medical treatments have contributed to falling vaccination rates.. A recent Health Alert Network (HAN) Health Advisory from the CDC highlighted Kentucky has only 43.8 % of individuals aged 18 and above recieved a flu vaccination. What policies, if any, would you implement to help Kentucky manage infectious diseases for which there are safe and effective vaccines?
First RFK Junior is a total whack job. Generally speaking, why would anybody not use modern advances in medicine a.k.a. vaccines and treatments to improve the chemical engine that we call the human body. It makes no sense to me. I think there’s a great deal of recent confusion because of Covid. Let me explain.
In 2020 just as Covid was raging in China and beginning its spread around the world I was at a business meeting with one of my associates, whose family owns a fireworks factory just outside of Wuhan. Within a few days me and a couple of friends that hung out after the meeting came down with the worst flu that we had ever had in our entire lives. To make a long story short, we had contracted Covid. I also contracted it two more times over the next seven or eight months with the Infection being about 50% less severe then the previous infection. Then all of a sudden there was no more infection. During this whole time neither my wife nor our four dogs nor the inside cat nor the dozens of outside community cats came down with Covid. We never took the vaccine, but in our case, the issue was very simple. Why take a vaccine when our natural bodies were able to handle the virus? My wife never even had a sniffling nose nor a cough or a sneeze so some people have natural immunity and others do not. As it turns out people who died almost without exception, had a compromised immune system in some form or fashion or another. Or they just simply had the wrong DNA in relation to that virus.
Now this happened to millions of people and we know that the human body has the potential to carry defenses to covid.
The problem is taking this one example and then saying all vaccines are bad is ridiculous. Both the geological DNA evidence as well as all of the data that was collected around the world during the latest outbreak tells us a science based story.
It also didn’t help matters that the Covid vaccine seemed to have been rushed through a process that normally takes 20 years and it was pressed into service in a few months. So on the one hand it is very natural to understand the publics suspicion of modern medicine. But the reality is, we should have faith and confidence in our medical institutions. They might be too expensive and they might be provided with incorrect delivery processes, but they are making great progress managing our chemical engines a.k.a. our bodies.
In terms of policy choices then the group of vaccines that I took as a young boy born in 1966 should absolutely be mandatory. Of course, once a person turns 18 it is their life and hence their decision. But the evidence of our own lives shows that childhood vaccines have extended life and prevented a huge amount of illness.
Q1 Obesity and diabetes is a rising concern throughout the nation and Kentucky consistently ranks among the least healthy states (i.e. ranked 5th in citizens with diabetes). What evidence-based policies, if any, do you support to improve community and preventative health for your constituents (e.g. Type II diabetes, Heart Disease, Obesity)?
Improving community and preventative health is a top priority, starting with a tiered approach that addresses immediate nutritional needs and long-term healthy habits. To combat rising rates of obesity and diabetes in Kentucky, I support the following evidence-based policies:
Q4 Vaccine hesitency and public skepticism about the safety of medical treatments have contributed to falling vaccination rates.. A recent Health Alert Network (HAN) Health Advisory from the CDC highlighted Kentucky has only 43.8 % of individuals aged 18 and above recieved a flu vaccination. What policies, if any, would you implement to help Kentucky manage infectious diseases for which there are safe and effective vaccines?
I believe healthcare is a fundamental right. To combat falling vaccination rates and manage infectious diseases effectively, my policy platform focuses on expanding healthcare access and restoring trust through equitable, community-driven care. If elected to Congress, I would advocate for the following:
Q4 Vaccine hesitency and public skepticism about the safety of medical treatments have contributed to falling vaccination rates.. A recent Health Alert Network (HAN) Health Advisory from the CDC highlighted Kentucky has only 43.8 % of individuals aged 18 and above recieved a flu vaccination. What policies, if any, would you implement to help Kentucky manage infectious diseases for which there are safe and effective vaccines?
Access to healthcare remains a barrier to trusting healthcare professionals. Surprise medical bills, lost coverage, closed hospitals. All of this can breed mistrust and skepticism of healthcare professionals and lead to lower vaccination rates. I believe healthcare is a human right and improving the access, affordability, and quality of care will help us improve community trust. This means restoring funding to Medicaid and the ACA while providing options for accessing and affording the same type of high-quality care people like Mitch McConnell receive.
Q4 Vaccine hesitency and public skepticism about the safety of medical treatments have contributed to falling vaccination rates.. A recent Health Alert Network (HAN) Health Advisory from the CDC highlighted Kentucky has only 43.8 % of individuals aged 18 and above recieved a flu vaccination. What policies, if any, would you implement to help Kentucky manage infectious diseases for which there are safe and effective vaccines?
Vaccine hesitancy is a serious public health challenge—especially in Kentucky, where only 43.8% of adults received a flu vaccine last year. To protect our communities, we must fight misinformation with trusted education. I support community-based public health campaigns that provide accurate, accessible information about vaccine safety and effectiveness. These programs should be led by local healthcare providers, faith leaders, and educators who people already trust. We should also partner with schools, clinics, and pharmacies to make vaccination easy and routine. When people have the facts, they make better choices. Education—not mandates—is the key to rebuilding confidence and stopping preventable outbreaks.
Q4 Vaccine hesitency and public skepticism about the safety of medical treatments have contributed to falling vaccination rates.. A recent Health Alert Network (HAN) Health Advisory from the CDC highlighted Kentucky has only 43.8 % of individuals aged 18 and above recieved a flu vaccination. What policies, if any, would you implement to help Kentucky manage infectious diseases for which there are safe and effective vaccines?
First RFK Junior is a total whack job. Generally speaking, why would anybody not use modern advances in medicine a.k.a. vaccines and treatments to improve the chemical engine that we call the human body. It makes no sense to me. I think there’s a great deal of recent confusion because of Covid. Let me explain.
In 2020 just as Covid was raging in China and beginning its spread around the world I was at a business meeting with one of my associates, whose family owns a fireworks factory just outside of Wuhan. Within a few days me and a couple of friends that hung out after the meeting came down with the worst flu that we had ever had in our entire lives. To make a long story short, we had contracted Covid. I also contracted it two more times over the next seven or eight months with the Infection being about 50% less severe then the previous infection. Then all of a sudden there was no more infection. During this whole time neither my wife nor our four dogs nor the inside cat nor the dozens of outside community cats came down with Covid. We never took the vaccine, but in our case, the issue was very simple. Why take a vaccine when our natural bodies were able to handle the virus? My wife never even had a sniffling nose nor a cough or a sneeze so some people have natural immunity and others do not. As it turns out people who died almost without exception, had a compromised immune system in some form or fashion or another. Or they just simply had the wrong DNA in relation to that virus.
Now this happened to millions of people and we know that the human body has the potential to carry defenses to covid.
The problem is taking this one example and then saying all vaccines are bad is ridiculous. Both the geological DNA evidence as well as all of the data that was collected around the world during the latest outbreak tells us a science based story.
It also didn’t help matters that the Covid vaccine seemed to have been rushed through a process that normally takes 20 years and it was pressed into service in a few months. So on the one hand it is very natural to understand the publics suspicion of modern medicine. But the reality is, we should have faith and confidence in our medical institutions. They might be too expensive and they might be provided with incorrect delivery processes, but they are making great progress managing our chemical engines a.k.a. our bodies.
In terms of policy choices then the group of vaccines that I took as a young boy born in 1966 should absolutely be mandatory. Of course, once a person turns 18 it is their life and hence their decision. But the evidence of our own lives shows that childhood vaccines have extended life and prevented a huge amount of illness.
Q4 Vaccine hesitency and public skepticism about the safety of medical treatments have contributed to falling vaccination rates.. A recent Health Alert Network (HAN) Health Advisory from the CDC highlighted Kentucky has only 43.8 % of individuals aged 18 and above recieved a flu vaccination. What policies, if any, would you implement to help Kentucky manage infectious diseases for which there are safe and effective vaccines?
I believe healthcare is a fundamental right. To combat falling vaccination rates and manage infectious diseases effectively, my policy platform focuses on expanding healthcare access and restoring trust through equitable, community-driven care. If elected to Congress, I would advocate for the following:
Pick a race to view candidate responses side by side. Only races with two or more responding candidates are shown.
Obesity and diabetes are growing crises, and Kentucky is hit hard—ranked 5th in the nation for diabetes. I support prevention over treatment. Key policies: expand nutrition education, increase access to fresh food, invest in walkable communities, and strengthen school wellness programs. We must also support preventive care through Medicaid and community health workers. Healthcare should be available to all. By focusing on prevention, we can reduce chronic disease, improve lives, and lower long-term costs.
Obesity is no doubt, a combination of diet, exercise, DNA. Much can be said about diabetes and heart disease too. On the one hand, I firmly disagree with the RFK Junior’s school of thought that pedals every imaginable snake oil to solve medical problems. The human body is a chemical engine. Therefore, we must understand all of its parts from a scientific point of view as well as how they relate with each other. Personally, I prefer to see more farmers markets, more fresh fruits, and vegetables, grown in Kentucky, landing on our meal plates. Less processed food is no doubt the better road to travel. Kentucky has a very unique mountain culture from the 37 eastern counties. Our ancestors maximized the use of the land for centuries and funny enough that diet was extremely healthy. Our modern diet might taste good because it’s loaded with sugar, but health wise it totally sucks. More to the point one of my main campaign pillars is that I advocate for a new medical approach addition to our nationwide system of healthcare. We need free preventive healthcare screening for all of our citizens. This can be paid for by Medicare, Medicaid and insurance policies, but ultimately the federal government has to look after the health of our citizens. My program basically says let’s get anyone who has any reason to believe whatsoever that they have an issue to go see a doctor for an examination and diagnosis which will be free. Why? If we catch disease early and can prevent it and or cure it, which is much more likely at an early stage then all of the really bad and expensive ramifications on the backend can be avoided. The basic example is changing the oil in your car. If you do not change that oil and or add oil at some point that engine is gonna freeze up, perhaps explode and turn a $20-$30 oil job into a total loss for that automobile. The human body is no different. So in scientific terms, the answer is, we must follow the evidence that all of our scientific avenues are able to turn up regarding the human body and this maintenance. The most common example on this free preventive healthcare question is of course something like cancer. Cancer is caught at stage one chances of beating that cancer and living at least the normal average lifespan is pretty certain however, if that cancer is not called early say not until stage three or four then often the patient has a few months to live. The system must be retold to prevent harm and not just to try to hopelessly repair harm that has already taken its toll.
Improving community and preventative health is a top priority, starting with a tiered approach that addresses immediate nutritional needs and long-term healthy habits. To combat rising rates of obesity and diabetes in Kentucky, I support the following evidence-based policies:
I finally believe that we must reforest and re-wild the land that we call Kentucky. Nature has blessed us with some of the best natural resources in the country, but they either go unnoticed, abused, or simply not looked after in a proper way. So the simple answer is we must use federal resources to clean up all waterways, all forests and all parts of the state specifically. Why? The list of benefits from a healthy land touches every part of our lives. It would take all day to list the benefits derived from reforesting, rewilding and cleaning up the natural environment, but it only takes one or two sentences to describe what happens if we don’t. Look around the galaxy and the universe. Do we see life on barren planets? Obviously no so the fate of our environment and planet is the fate of humanity. Clean it or lose it.
Addressing Kentucky’s water quality degradation, particularly the contamination from coal ash dumps and acid mine drainage, requires a commitment to evidence-based governance and technical precision. My policy approach centers on the belief that we must ensure we have dedicated experts in these fields on staff to manage these complex environmental threats. While I am clear on the end result we must accomplish—clean, safe groundwater and streams for every Kentuckian—I recognize that achieving this requires a team of specialists to ensure we are giving our Commonwealth the best possible chance at a successful recovery.
To effectively address these challenges, I would implement the following policy framework:
Ultimately, protecting our water is about protecting the health and economic future of Kentucky families. By empowering a team of experts to guide our regulatory and restoration efforts, we can move past political rhetoric and deliver the practical, science-based solutions our communities deserve.
Clean water is essential to life, and Kentucky’s communities deserve better than contaminated groundwater and streams from coal ash and acid mine drainage. I believe we should leverage the AI and data center boom—not just for growth, but for good. These multibillion-dollar investments can and should help clean up our legacy pollution. Let’s repurpose brownfield sites into offsite solar farms to power these facilities, turning environmental liabilities into clean energy assets. This isn’t just cleanup—it’s smart economic development. We can create jobs, generate revenue, and restore our land and water for future generations.
I have a page on my campaign website, devoted to data centers. It would be a wise idea to at least listen to the short video on that particular page. But the basic idea is Kentucky is the wrong place for data centers. They don’t produce lasting jobs. They consume huge amounts of water and electricity. Animal populations are badly impacted. This whole data center industry is the main reason why utility bills are going through the roof across the country. Data centers can be made smaller. Every home computer can be turned into a micro data center. See my video link for more analysis. https://www.robertquigleyforcongress.com/data-centers
We need to focus on the actual issues behind the data center conversations, and that starts with a commitment to open and transparent governance when it comes to data center contracts. These projects often involve foreign interests and massive corporate giveaways that have been forced into Kentucky communities without ratepayer protections or public input.
I support policies that prioritize community-led decision-making and mandatory disclosure regarding what these data centers are for. We are not anti-technology, but we are pro-communities making their own decisions about their resources. For too long, the people who have to live with these projects, our workers, farmers, and local leaders, have been excluded from the process. These policies are right for Kentucky because they shift the focus back to public interest and ensure that any development deliver real benefits, respect our community, and improve our quality of life rather than just serving special interests.
Vaccine hesitancy is a serious public health challenge—especially in Kentucky, where only 43.8% of adults received a flu vaccine last year. To protect our communities, we must fight misinformation with trusted education. I support community-based public health campaigns that provide accurate, accessible information about vaccine safety and effectiveness. These programs should be led by local healthcare providers, faith leaders, and educators who people already trust. We should also partner with schools, clinics, and pharmacies to make vaccination easy and routine. When people have the facts, they make better choices. Education—not mandates—is the key to rebuilding confidence and stopping preventable outbreaks.
First RFK Junior is a total whack job. Generally speaking, why would anybody not use modern advances in medicine a.k.a. vaccines and treatments to improve the chemical engine that we call the human body. It makes no sense to me. I think there’s a great deal of recent confusion because of Covid. Let me explain.
In 2020 just as Covid was raging in China and beginning its spread around the world I was at a business meeting with one of my associates, whose family owns a fireworks factory just outside of Wuhan. Within a few days me and a couple of friends that hung out after the meeting came down with the worst flu that we had ever had in our entire lives. To make a long story short, we had contracted Covid. I also contracted it two more times over the next seven or eight months with the Infection being about 50% less severe then the previous infection. Then all of a sudden there was no more infection. During this whole time neither my wife nor our four dogs nor the inside cat nor the dozens of outside community cats came down with Covid. We never took the vaccine, but in our case, the issue was very simple. Why take a vaccine when our natural bodies were able to handle the virus? My wife never even had a sniffling nose nor a cough or a sneeze so some people have natural immunity and others do not. As it turns out people who died almost without exception, had a compromised immune system in some form or fashion or another. Or they just simply had the wrong DNA in relation to that virus.
Now this happened to millions of people and we know that the human body has the potential to carry defenses to covid.
The problem is taking this one example and then saying all vaccines are bad is ridiculous. Both the geological DNA evidence as well as all of the data that was collected around the world during the latest outbreak tells us a science based story.
It also didn’t help matters that the Covid vaccine seemed to have been rushed through a process that normally takes 20 years and it was pressed into service in a few months. So on the one hand it is very natural to understand the publics suspicion of modern medicine. But the reality is, we should have faith and confidence in our medical institutions. They might be too expensive and they might be provided with incorrect delivery processes, but they are making great progress managing our chemical engines a.k.a. our bodies.
In terms of policy choices then the group of vaccines that I took as a young boy born in 1966 should absolutely be mandatory. Of course, once a person turns 18 it is their life and hence their decision. But the evidence of our own lives shows that childhood vaccines have extended life and prevented a huge amount of illness.
I believe healthcare is a fundamental right. To combat falling vaccination rates and manage infectious diseases effectively, my policy platform focuses on expanding healthcare access and restoring trust through equitable, community-driven care. If elected to Congress, I would advocate for the following:
As a Type 1 diabetic who’s had to ration my insulin in order to have enough money to feed my daughters, I understand the struggles Kentuckians face every single day. Healthcare is a human right. No one should have to ration their medicine, skip a doctor’s appointment, or choose between paying a medical bill or putting food on the table. We need to make healthcare more affordable for every Kentuckian. We need to restore the Affordable Care Act subsidies, provide additional options for access to health insurance, lower prescription drug costs, and restore the devastating cuts to Medicaid threatening to close dozens of rural hospitals across Kentucky and even more across the country.
Every Kentuckian deserves access to clean drinking water. We need to make sure we direct federal resources into our communities to address the damage done to our groundwater and streams. When I served as Director of Administrative Services at the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife, I saw firsthand the impact of water pollution and was left especially motivated to combat it.
Kentuckians deserve to know how data centers will impact their utility bills, environment, and their communities. It’s why I support a national moratorium on all new AI data center construction until we fully understand the impact on our health, environment, water supply, and utility bills. We must ensure that existing data centers pay the full costs for the impact on our electric bills and pass legislation to limit the impact of data centers on our environment and natural resources.
Access to healthcare remains a barrier to trusting healthcare professionals. Surprise medical bills, lost coverage, closed hospitals. All of this can breed mistrust and skepticism of healthcare professionals and lead to lower vaccination rates. I believe healthcare is a human right and improving the access, affordability, and quality of care will help us improve community trust. This means restoring funding to Medicaid and the ACA while providing options for accessing and affording the same type of high-quality care people like Mitch McConnell receive.
None yet! Check back soon for updates!