Back to map

Utah

Created by the Utah Stance on Science team. Please contact StanceOnScienceUT@gmail.com with any questions.

Jump to candidate responses

Utah will face many challenges in the coming years, and it is increasingly critical that our policymakers understand the importance of evidence-based decision-making. The goals of this resource are to:

  1. Provide voters with clear, accessible information so they can see how candidates value science in decision-making.
  2. Hold candidates accountable by sharing their responses publicly on our website and via local media.
  3. Encourage thoughtful engagement between communities and policymakers on science policy-related topics in our state.

Through Stance on Science, we hope to help Utahns understand how their elected representatives will utilize science to improve the state that they love. Learn more about this initiative on the home page.

How to use this resource

This webpage houses the responses to 5 questions crafted by the Utah Stance on Science team.

Only official candidates who will appear on ballots were contacted.

Candidates were contacted in October 2026 (with a follow-up to those who did not initially respond) and given the opportunity to answer the questions selected for their race. Only the responses of candidates who answered the questions are included. None of the candidates' responses were modified in any way before being published on this resource page.

For the November 2026 General Election, only candidates in the following elections were contacted:

US House
Utah Senate
Utah House
The questions posed
  1. Colorado River Basin states, including Utah, missed a federal deadline to agree on new rules for sharing the river once current operating guidelines expire, and federal forecasts earlier this year projected that Lake Powell could fall to the level at which Glen Canyon Dam can no longer generate hydropower. What policies, if any, would you support to manage the Colorado River sustainably, and how would you balance competing demands from agriculture, growing communities, industry, tribal nations, and the environment? (see "Environment")Asked of: US House of Representatives, State Senate, State House of Representatives candidates.
  2. The Great Salt Lake ended 2025 at its third-lowest level in more than 120 years, and more than 120 square miles of exposed lakebed in Farmington Bay alone have become sources of windblown dust along the Wasatch Front. What policies and funding, if any, would you prioritize for scientific monitoring of the lake, its watershed, and its air quality impacts, and to help communities adapt? (see "Environment")Asked of: US House of Representatives, State Senate, State House of Representatives candidates.
  3. Utah’s measles outbreak, which began in June 2025, had surpassed 700 cases by August 2026, one of the largest outbreaks in the country, and about 12.8% of Utah kindergarteners were missing their measles vaccine last school year. As an elected official, how do you approach engaging with communities that have concerns about infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety, and what policies, if any, would you support related to these issues, and why? (see "Public Health")Asked of: US House of Representatives, State Senate, State House of Representatives candidates.
  4. Utah is seeing proposals for large data centers, including a planned campus in Juab County requesting up to 750 megawatts of electricity, while the state is also pursuing new energy sources, including advanced nuclear reactors. What role, if any, do you believe sources such as nuclear, natural gas, coal, solar, wind, geothermal, and hydropower should play in the country’s future energy mix? What policies, if any, would you support related to energy development, grid reliability, and the water and power needs of data centers? (see "Energy")Asked of: US House of Representatives, State Senate, State House of Representatives candidates.
  5. The University of Utah had 77 of its federal research grants cancelled in 2025 – resulting in the loss of $16 million in research funding. As a member of Congress, you would vote on appropriations for federal science agencies, including the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, and the Department of Energy. What priorities, if any, would guide your decisions on federal science funding, and why? (see "Science Funding")Asked of: US House of Representatives candidates.

Disclaimer

The responses of candidates shared on this webpage do not reflect the views of the Utah Stance on Science team or the Scientist Network for Advancing Policy (SNAP) Coalition. SNAP is a non-partisan organization (please see more about SNAP here). SNAP and the Utah Stance on Science team do not endorse any candidates. The goals of this initiative can be found here. Please contact StanceOnScienceUT@gmail.com with any questions.

To find your districts for state and federal races and see who is on your ballot, please visit the Utah Voter Information website.


November 2026 General Election

No candidate responses have been published yet. Please check back soon.

Press Mentions

    None yet! Check back soon for updates!