Andrew Hattaway
RepublicanQ1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?
“I would rely on scientists whenever a policy touches public health, natural resources, environmental protection, or any issue where solid data and research are essential for responsible decision making. When evaluating a bill, I would consult subject matter experts to review the evidence, understand potential impacts, and ensure that my vote is grounded in sound science rather than politics or special interests. My priority is to support policies that protect Minnesotans and reflect the best available research.”
KEYWORDS: Evidence‑based decision making, public health and environmental expertise, Subject matter consultation
Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?
“The Boundary Waters is a national treasure, and any activity in its watershed must meet strict standards that protect clean water and local communities. I support responsible resource development, but only when independent review shows it will not harm the region’s lakes, rivers, or long‑term economic stability. Mining plays an important role in energy and manufacturing, yet this specific area is uniquely sensitive and requires extra caution.
I support policies that require rigorous environmental review, strong financial assurance from companies, and clear, science‑based safeguards to protect the watershed. Minnesota should not accept projects that leave taxpayers responsible for cleanup or put a world‑class ecosystem at risk. Responsible development is possible, but protecting the Boundary Waters must remain the priority.”
KEYWORDS: Clean water protection, responsible development, Science‑based safeguards
Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?
“PFAS contamination is a serious issue, and Minnesotans deserve clean, safe drinking water. I support a balanced approach that protects public health while ensuring that regulations are clear and practical. My priority is holding polluters accountable rather than placing unnecessary burdens on families, farmers, or small businesses.
I would support policies that strengthen monitoring of PFAS in community water systems, require companies to fully disclose the chemicals they use, and ensure that manufacturers not taxpayers pay for cleanup when contamination occurs. I also back investments in modern water treatment technology and partnerships with local governments to upgrade aging infrastructure.
Protecting residents from PFAS is essential, but it must be done in a way that supports both public health and long-term economic stability.”
KEYWORDS: Clean water protection, Accountability for polluters, Science based monitoring
Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?
“Data centers bring major economic opportunities, but they also create demands on local infrastructure. I support a balanced approach that encourages investment while making sure communities are protected. Any project should undergo a thorough review of its impacts on energy use, water systems, emergency services, and long-term infrastructure needs.
Data centers should be responsible for covering the costs of any upgrades they require so taxpayers are not left paying for private development.
Minnesota can welcome innovation and job growth while still protecting local communities. The goal is responsible development that strengthens our economy without creating long term burdens for residents.”
KEYWORDS: Responsible development, Infrastructure review, Community protection
Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?
“I support funding that is transparent, efficient, and tied to clear outcomes. When research drives medical advances, supports jobs, and grows our economy, it is a smart investment.
I would back policies that encourage federal agencies like the National Institute on Health to continue partnering with Minnesota universities, while ensuring that grants are awarded through a fair, merit‑based process. At the state level, I support efforts that promote public‑private research partnerships, reduce unnecessary red tape, and help Minnesota compete for national research funding.
Strong science research supports health care, agriculture, technology, and emergency response. Continued investment should be guided by accountability, measurable results, and a focus on projects that deliver benefits for Minnesotans.”
KEYWORDS: Transparent funding, Merit based research, Public private partnerships
Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?
“We need to continue policies that save lives while strengthening public safety. I support an approach that focuses on treatment access, community partnerships, and accountability for those who traffic dangerous drugs.
I would back efforts to expand evidence-based treatment, improve coordination between state agencies, tribal communities and support local programs that have proven effective in reducing overdoses. Strengthening access to mental health services, recovery housing, and rapid response teams can help keep this downward trend moving.
Law enforcement also plays a critical role. I support giving officers and first responders the tools they need to disrupt fentanyl trafficking, respond quickly to overdoses, and keep dangerous substances out of our communities.
We should continue investing in strategies that work, especially in communities facing the highest risks. The goal is simple: fewer deaths, stronger families, and safer neighborhoods across the state.”
KEYWORDS: Treatment access, Community safety, Evidence based programs