Minnesota

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“Prority #3 on my web presentation: “3. Highly tax cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence operations, particularly as to their energy usage, and closely regulate artificial intelligence.” As a brief elaboration, insure the integrity of AI-generated communications over any media, and encourage full transparency in local permitting processes.”

KEYWORDS: honesty, accuracy, transparency

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“Hyperscale data centers offer needed technological growth but place immense strains on state power grids and local water resources. I support policy requiring grid-impact assessments, water-efficiency standards, transparent energy sourcing, and ensuring data center operators cover their fair share of infrastructure upgrades so residential utility ratepayers aren’t burdened. We must build energy abundance.”

KEYWORDS: Grid-Impact, Efficiency, Infrastructure

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“Data centers can bring construction work, technology investment, and economic opportunities to Minnesota, but their benefits must be balanced against their significant demands on electricity, water, land, and public infrastructure.

I support requiring large data-center proposals to undergo transparent assessments of their water consumption, energy needs, backup-generator emissions, noise, and effects on nearby communities. Reviews should consider cumulative impacts when multiple facilities are proposed in the same region. Companies should pay the full infrastructure and energy costs created by their projects so those expenses are not shifted to families or small businesses.

I also support strong water-conservation and clean-energy requirements, responsible siting, public participation, and regular reporting of actual resource use. Any tax incentives should be transparent and tied to measurable benefits, including permanent local jobs, workforce training, and community investment.

Minnesota should welcome innovation, but development must be responsible and should not leave residents with higher utility bills or fewer natural resources.”

KEYWORDS: Responsible Innovation, Resource Protection, Accountability

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“Data centers can bring economic opportunities, but hyperscale facilities can also have significant impacts on energy use, water resources, infrastructure, and surrounding communities. Minnesota should not give these projects a free pass.

I support the highest standards of accountability and review for hyperscale data centers, including comprehensive environmental and infrastructure impact assessments before approval. Communities deserve meaningful opportunities for public input, and all relevant information about a proposed project—including its energy and water use, environmental impacts, tax arrangements, and public costs—should be transparent and accessible.

Data centers should be responsible for the infrastructure and resources they require rather than shifting those costs to Minnesota taxpayers and ratepayers. I would also support clear, enforceable standards for energy and water use and appropriate environmental protections.

We can welcome innovation and economic development while still protecting our communities and natural resources. The standard should be simple: **if a project affects the public, the public deserves a full review, a voice in the process, and complete transparency about the costs and benefits.**”

KEYWORDS: accountability review infrastructure

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“The rapid expansion of hyperscale data centers threatens to push our clean energy grid to its limit and strain local water supplies. While recent legislation took steps by ending electricity sales tax exemptions and requiring basic DNR water reviews, it did not go far enough to protect ratepayers and the environment. I support unyielding state-level regulations to act as a shield for our communities: Mandatory Closed-Loop Systems: Any facility using over 100 million gallons of water annually must be mandated—not just encouraged—to use closed-loop, recycling cooling systems to preserve critical groundwater. Grid Infrastructure Protections: We must strictly enforce that 100% of the massive energy infrastructure upgrades required by tech conglomerates are paid for upfront by the corporations themselves, guaranteeing utility bills never skyrocket for working-class families. Local Sovereignty and Transparency: I support empowering local municipalities to implement temporary development pauses or moratoria without the threat of corporate litigation, ensuring residents have a transparent, democratic say over noise, water, and grid impacts. We cannot allow massive tech companies to exhaust Minnesota’s resources for corporate profit while everyday citizens foot the bill.”

KEYWORDS: Closed-Loop Mandates

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“Across the political spectrum, regardless of background or geography, Minnesotans across our state are standing up and saying no to hyper-scale data centers in our backyards. These large hyper-scale projects could prove devastating to the health and wellbeing of our people, ecosystems, energy grid, and watersheds. I am in full support Sen. Jen McEwen’s hyper-scale data center moratorium legislation (a two-year pause) she authored this legislative session, and hope to pass similar legislation next session.

We must follow in the footsteps of states like New York and pass a temporary pause / data center moratorium to allow time for our state government to conduct adequate environmental impact studies and set forth strong regulations regarding data centers. In Minneapolis, we have had many local debates over data center developments. There have been countless concerns raised about the environmental and community impact of massive facilities, and our Minneapolis City Council approved a six-month moratorium on new data center development, with exceptions for smaller downtown projects.”

KEYWORDS: environmental impact / strong regulations / moratorium

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“”Right to privacy” is implied by a combination of amendments the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 9th, and 15th. 9th non-enumerated rights. I feel like the internet and social media together have crossed the line on infringing on right to privacy. They seem to use entrapment as a means of justification rather than it being unjust. The law should protect people from these desires rather than let corporations entrap them. AI is to unregulated at this time. Very hard on our children. Data centers will create more chaos.”

KEYWORDS: Loss of privacy.

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“Artificial intelligence and data centers represent significant opportunities for Minnesota’s economy, but growth must be managed responsibly. I support requiring large data center projects to evaluate impacts on electricity demand, water resources, transportation infrastructure, cybersecurity, and local communities before approval. Developers should prioritize energy efficiency, water conservation, grid reliability, and partnerships with local utilities. Minnesota should encourage innovation while ensuring taxpayers are not left paying for infrastructure upgrades that primarily benefit private companies. AI also requires thoughtful governance that protects privacy, promotes transparency where appropriate, and prepares our workforce for the jobs of tomorrow. We should welcome technological investment while protecting the communities that host it.”

KEYWORDS: Innovation, Sustainability, Infrastructure

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“Building something smarter than us is a reality that should give us pause. One of the scientists who invented AI, predicted that it would take over in ten years. We can not stop the billions of dollars invested in AI. I will author legislation to limit the construction of 765-kv transmission towers between states and regulatory agencies. I have e-mailed my concerns about the lack of need and eminent domain easements of 250 feet to connect@gophertobadgerlink.com. Re: Docket # 25-117, E002,ET2,ET6675,CN-22-532.”

KEYWORDS: Moratorium, fear, oversite

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“I support the right of municipalities to enact moratoriums on data centers, oppose the use of confidentiality agreements by local officials in all cases but especially when it comes to data centers and want to see any data centers built pay their fair share of taxes. While they can be built without a lot of water use (in same cases) by using HVAC systems for cooling, I still want to see strong environmental reviews for any proposed data centers built in Minnesota and want to see the companies building them use renewable energy.”

KEYWORDS: Renewable energy, pay taxes

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“I am partially against data centers. I am fully against ordinary families paying for them. These facilities use as much electricity as a small city and millions of gallons of water for cooling. When a hyperscaler plugs into the grid, somebody builds the new generation and transmission to serve it. Too often that cost lands on every household’s electric bill while the tech company gets a tax break for showing up. My policies. First, the data center pays its own way. Full cost of the power and grid upgrades it demands, locked in by contract, so residential ratepayers are protected. Second, no water permits without an independent assessment of what the aquifer and local wells can spare. Farmers and rural families were there first. Third, tax breaks only if they are earned with permanent local jobs, not construction jobs that vanish in two years. Fourth, local governments keep the final say. No state or federal preemption of township and county decisions. Big Tech has plenty of lobbyists in Washington. I take no PAC money and no lobbyist money, so when the data center and your electric bill disagree, I work for you.”

KEYWORDS: electric rates, ratepayer protection, water use

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“Data centers bring major economic opportunities, but they also create demands on local infrastructure. I support a balanced approach that encourages investment while making sure communities are protected. Any project should undergo a thorough review of its impacts on energy use, water systems, emergency services, and long-term infrastructure needs.

Data centers should be responsible for covering the costs of any upgrades they require so taxpayers are not left paying for private development.

Minnesota can welcome innovation and job growth while still protecting local communities. The goal is responsible development that strengthens our economy without creating long term burdens for residents.”

KEYWORDS: Responsible development, Infrastructure review, Community protection

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“Data centers can bring investment and jobs to Minnesota, but communities should not be asked to write them a blank check when it comes to electricity, water, infrastructure, or taxpayer subsidies. I support requiring developers to disclose projected water and energy use before approval, conducting meaningful environmental review, protecting local control, and ensuring the public has an opportunity to weigh in. Projects with enormous water demands should demonstrate that they will not threaten local aquifers or drinking-water supplies and should use conservation, water recycling, reclaimed water, and closed-loop systems wherever feasible. Minnesota has already begun establishing stronger water-use requirements for large data centers, and I support building on that framework. I also believe data centers should pay the infrastructure and energy costs they create rather than shifting those costs onto Minnesota families and small businesses. Any public incentives should be tied to clear, enforceable benefits such as permanent jobs and community investment.”

KEYWORDS: Transparency, Sustainability, Ratepayers

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“Hyperscale data centers can bring investment and jobs, but their impacts on electricity demand, water use, infrastructure, land use, and utility costs must be fully understood before local or state approvals are granted. I support requiring independent environmental and infrastructure reviews, public disclosure of projected energy and water use, and clear plans for managing emissions, backup generators, wastewater, and emergency response. I also support banning nondisclosure agreements between data center companies and local elected officials or public employees when those agreements prevent residents from understanding proposals that may affect their community. Public decisions involving major tax incentives, land use changes, or infrastructure commitments should be made transparently, with meaningful opportunities for public input. Developers should pay their fair share of required infrastructure upgrades so residents and other ratepayers are not left covering the costs. Minnesota should also establish enforceable efficiency standards, encourage renewable energy use, protect local water supplies, and require regular reporting after facilities begin operating. I believe innovation must be paired with transparency, accountability, and responsible long-term planning.”

KEYWORDS: Transparency, Sustainability, Oversight

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“I support full environmental review, including cumulative impacts on groundwater, wastewater, air quality, and the electric grid. Data centers should meet enforceable water and energy standards, disclose their projected and actual resource use, and pay for the infrastructure upgrades and other impacts they create. Their costs should not be shifted onto ratepayers or taxpayers. Local communities should receive early notice, meaningful public hearings, full information about project backers and public subsidies, and the authority to reject projects that do not fit their long-term plans. Public incentives should require clear benefits, including prevailing wages, local hiring, and infrastructure contributions. Developers should also provide financial assurances so communities are not left carrying the risk.”

KEYWORDS: environmental review, water protection, public transparency, local control

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

Sen. Klobuchar provided this letter to the Minnesota Stance on Science team.

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“AI and data centers will be part of our economic future, and Minnesota has an opportunity to benefit from that growth. But development should benefit the communities hosting these facilities…not simply shift costs and resource demands onto residents.

I support requiring meaningful environmental and infrastructure assessments for hyperscale data centers, including their electricity and water consumption, impacts on the electrical grid, backup power emissions, and effects on local water supplies. Communities should know the long-term resource demands before projects are approved.

We should also examine whether existing tax incentives for extremely profitable corporations provide sufficient public benefit. Any public incentives should be tied to measurable outcomes, including permanent jobs, local economic investment, environmental protections, and infrastructure contributions.

Data centers should pay their fair share of infrastructure and energy costs rather than shifting those expenses onto residential customers or small businesses.

Minnesota can welcome technological innovation while setting reasonable guardrails. Economic development should be a partnership.”

KEYWORDS: Accountability (again and again). Public Benefit. Sustainability.

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“One of these proposed ones is a mile from my house and I work in IT, so I know them well. First, would be updating noise nuisance laws to accommodate low frequency and continuous sounds. Second, mandatory reporting of electricity and water usage above certain thresholds. Third, classifying hyperscale data centers as heavy industry. Forth, no NDAs.”

KEYWORDS: Modernization, Transparency, Personal

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“A one-year moratorium on the licensning of any new hylerscale data centers, with the interim period being used to carefully evaluate all the ramifications. Then a decision on how the state should regulate them.”

KEYWORDS: hyperscale moratorium

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“I support reasonable development of data centers that strengthens our economy while protecting local communities and natural resources. Before approval, projects should undergo thorough environmental and infrastructure reviews that evaluate impacts on energy demand, Water use, land use and local transportation. I support transparency in these assessments, meaningful public input and requirements for developers to help offset infrastructure costs. I also encourage the use of energy efficient technologies, water conservation measures and increased use of reliable, low emission energy sources where feasible. The goal is to welcome investments while ensuring the communities are not left bearing the environmental or financial cost.”

KEYWORDS: Responsible Technology Development

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“Remove NDAs and create a transparent list of all elected officials on all levels of government who have signed one to approve the building of these facilities without public approval. Create legislation that require neighboring communities and states to approve/disapprove the centers as resources do not stop at imaginary lines on the map.”

KEYWORDS: Transparency, Investigate, and Accountability

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“Data centers are important infrastructure for our increasingly digital economy, including artificial intelligence, but Minnesota should understand their full impact before committing significant public resources to them. I support rigorous review of major projects’ electricity demand, water consumption, environmental impacts, effects on the electrical grid, and potential costs to residential and small-business ratepayers. Large data centers should pay their fair share of infrastructure costs rather than shifting those costs onto existing customers, and developers should be transparent about expected energy and water use. I also support incentives and requirements that encourage water reuse, efficient cooling, clean energy, and other technologies that reduce environmental impact. The goal should not be to reject innovation, but to make sure Minnesota gains the economic benefits of new technology without quietly socializing its costs.”

KEYWORDS: Innovation, Sustainability, Accountability

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“Minnesota can benefit from data center investment, but it has to be done responsibly. I support requiring thorough environmental and community impact assessments before projects move forward, especially around energy use, water consumption, and strain on local infrastructure. These facilities should be powered by 100% clean energy and meet strong efficiency standards so they don’t set back our climate goals. I also believe in local input, communities deserve a real voice in decisions that affect their land and resources. We should ensure these projects create good-paying local jobs and contribute fairly to the communities they operate in. Growth is important, but it needs to be balanced with protecting our environment, our resources, and the long-term interests of Minnesotans.”

KEYWORDS: Responsible, ethical, transparency, data privacy, security

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“I do not support Data centers, not enough information on cause and effects.”

KEYWORDS: Data centers may be harmful to the environment and to humans.

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“I strongly support policies that would measure the impact of data centers as well as strong environmental and community-impact review processes to be carried out prior to approval for new centers. No center should be built if it will negatively impact people’s health, quality of life in their homes and communities, or the legacy of our natural spaces.”

KEYWORDS: Data Center, Review, Health, Quality of Life, Environment

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“AI Data Centers are being built for the purposes of handling the data process of listing, categorizing and surveilling people without their knowledge and consent. AI is over hyped algorithmic intelligence, not “artificial intelligence.” I would advocate strongly against the expansion of AI Data Centers where they are not wanted. This applies to AI enabled hardware like surveillance cameras, which constitute a violation of the fourteenth amendment.”

KEYWORDS: N/A

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“I support a local government’s right to authorize, ban, and/or regulate data centers. This should not be a statewide or federal policy as the impacts are primarily local. The statewide and regional impacts are primarily based on a potential electrical consumption causing shortages or price spikes. This could be solved by allowing or requiring data centers to produce their own energy along with an electrical impact assessment.”

KEYWORDS: Local Control Regulation

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“I support AI innovation, but large data centers must be developed responsibly. I support requiring public hearings, environmental impact review, energy and water use reporting, grid and ratepayer protections, clean energy standards, water conservation, e-waste plans, host community benefits, tax incentive transparency, and prevailing wage requirements. Data centers should pay their own infrastructure costs and not shift burdens onto local residents.”

KEYWORDS: Innovation, Sustainability, Standards

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“Data centers must be regulated in order to protect Community. They have been significant environmental impacts as well as an impact on jobs. I have talked to several union members about artificial intelligence and how it can impact their employment. Many want technological advances, but they don’t want it at the expense of the environment. We must explore options such as cold water input into data centers and an increase in environmental legislation/ordinances from the city government all the way up to the Federal level”

KEYWORDS: Cold water input

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“I think I am for them but I also believe they need to bring a lot to the communities they are impacting especially with regard to how much electricity they will be using.”

KEYWORDS: be wary

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“Polices that should be enacted are NDAs are illegal when public interests are at stake, any company should follow the good neighbor ideal of not causing any economic harm to the public, and environmental balance has to be invested in by a data center.”

KEYWORDS: Neighbor, truthful, balance

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“As with any industry, the creation of an industrial workspace can have huge negative impacts on the people around them and the environment. We need to have independent environmental experts weigh in on this impact (not industry shills) and proceed accordingly. I have nothing against data centers per se, but they can’t be allowed to create noise hazards or deplete water resources. (And that should be true of every industry.)”

KEYWORDS: Independent Experts

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“I don’t know enough to say if I am for or against data centers, I just think there should be more discussions about them. Why do big data centers need to be in population centers? Why can’t they be built in the middle of nowhere? Do they emission chemical pollutions? Will they have a lot of noise? Do they have technologies to reduce or eliminate their noise? Is AI critical to our national security? Do we want China to lead in the AI race? These are the questions I don’t yet know, but should be discussed. ”

KEYWORDS: China, AI Dominance

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“At this time, I do not support expanding hyperscale data centers without stronger protections in place. Growing up on a farm taught me the importance of protecting our water and natural resources. I am concerned about the impact these facilities can have on water usage, energy demands, and the cost of electricity for families. Any future projects must fully protect our water, our environment, and the people of Minnesota.”

KEYWORDS: protect our recouces

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“I support a slow-down in production if not a full moratorium if we cannot produce scientifically backed plans to build data centers in a way that protects the surrounding environments and communities.”

KEYWORDS: Plan, Prioritize Environment

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“These facilities use enormous amounts of electricity and water in a state where utility bills are already climbing. A project that builds here has to leave the community better off than it found it. Anything less takes from a place that cannot afford the loss.

I support repealing the data center sales tax exemption. Minnesota is giving away revenue to the world’s most profitable companies for a small number of permanent jobs, and that money is needed for schools, water systems, and roads.

I support a temporary moratorium on new hyperscale facilities until the Public Utilities Commission completes a study and the state has rules in place, along the lines of SF 4298. That gives us time to write the rules before the concrete is poured.

Every rule I want is measured against net gain. Closed loop or recycled cooling with enforceable withdrawal limits, so the aquifer comes out ahead. Public reporting of actual water and energy use, not projections. The company pays for the grid upgrades and generation its load requires. Ratepayer protections that lower bills for customers already on the system.

Water, power, tax base, and jobs: communities should be ahead on all four.”

KEYWORDS: Net community gain, Repeal exemption, Ratepayer protection

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“I would actually halt any current hyperscale data centers currently being built and actually ban it. It does nothing except increase people’s electricity and water bills, pollute the water and is obnoxiously loud. And it’s useless when the AI bubble is about to pop. It is not the hype the media makes it to be.”

KEYWORDS: All hype, another dotcom bubble waiting to burst. MN will should bear the wait of the incoming crash. AI is fake. we’re nowhere close to it.

Q4 There have been multiple hyperscale data centers proposed throughout the state, including one currently under construction. What policies and regulations, if any, do you support to assess and act on the potential impacts of these data centers?

“I do not support data centers. This is the exact type of thing that needs to have cooling mechanisms regulated. If y’all knew the information they’re storing and who gets to use it for what, you would be 2A mfs, too. Data centers are for cities that can’t manage an economy so they need to sell out the environment and worsen global warming to compensate for their incompetent leadership. Instead, we should push ScIeNcE in order to develop something less detrimental to the environment. I’ve seen proposed space centers naturally cooled by the vacuum, but that seems unnecessary costly. We could also prioritize life on earth over every narcissist’s every GRWM being saved because that is the real cost of these sell-out options tech gives to incompetent leaders.”

KEYWORDS: Ai is a bubble because it will never generate revenue to be worth every American’s retirement fund investing in it, so we should stop.

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“Absent a major world war, no mining should occur in the BWCAW watershed.”

KEYWORDS: protect the BWCAW

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“locate mitigate regulate litigate (if needed) similar to superfund CERCLA cleanup processes”

KEYWORDS: locate mitigate regulate

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“Minnesota stewards roughly 20% of the nation’s fresh surface water, including the pristine Rainy River watershed, alongside domestic reserves that include 95% of the country’s nickel and 34% of its copper resources. Protecting our water and advancing national mineral security are not mutually exclusive—they require pragmatic, non-political oversight. State authority through the DNR and MPCA must enforce rigorous clean water standards to protect critical watersheds. At the same time, we must support modern, highly regulated mining practices to prevent emergency mineral shortages during geopolitical crises that could force hasty development under lowered environmental standards.”

KEYWORDS: Watershed-Protection, Strategic-Minerals, Environmental-Review

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“Clean drinking water is a basic infrastructure requirement, not a partisan debate. Eden Prairie and Minnetonka residents shouldn’t face utility rate hikes or property tax increases to clean up industrial contaminants. I support ensuring state resources and legacy polluter settlements—not local taxpayers—fund necessary municipal filtration upgrades. State agencies must establish clear, science-based PFAS standards while providing local utilities with the funding flexibility and technical support required to deploy effective treatment technologies without administrative delays.”

KEYWORDS: Remediation, Water-Quality, Accountability

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I oppose mining projects that could permanently threaten the Boundary Waters watershed. The Boundary Waters is an irreplaceable source of clean water, wildlife habitat, outdoor recreation, tourism, and jobs. Once this interconnected watershed is contaminated, restoring it may be impossible.

I oppose the decision to overturn the 20-year mining protections. I would support strong state safeguards for the watershed, independent scientific review, meaningful consultation with Tribal Nations, and full consideration of cumulative environmental impacts. Mining companies must demonstrate that their operations will not pollute surrounding waters, and taxpayers must never be left responsible for cleanup costs.

Minnesota can support responsible economic development and good-paying jobs without risking one of our most valuable natural resources. Decisions involving the Boundary Waters must be based on long-term scientific evidence, not short-term political or corporate pressure.”

KEYWORDS: Clean Water, Protection, Accountability

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“Every Minnesotan deserves safe drinking water, regardless of their ZIP code or income. I support comprehensive testing of public water systems and private wells, transparent reporting of PFAS results, and prompt notification when unsafe contamination is found.

The state should help affected communities install effective treatment systems and secure available federal funding, with priority given to small communities and families that cannot afford these costs. Minnesota should also identify and control PFAS at its source, strengthen monitoring of industries that use or release these chemicals, and hold responsible polluters accountable for cleanup expenses.

I support continued investment in PFAS research, statewide contamination mapping, and assistance for communities to meet federal drinking-water standards. Prevention is less expensive and safer than allowing contamination to spread. The cost should not simply be passed to homeowners and local utility customers who did not cause the pollution.”

KEYWORDS: Safe Water, Prevention, Polluter Accountability

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“The Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness and the watershed that surrounds it are irreplaceable Minnesota treasures. I oppose mining projects that put this unique ecosystem and its clean water at risk.

Minnesotans should not have to choose between economic opportunity and protecting the resources that sustain our communities. But some places are simply too important to gamble with—and the Boundary Waters is one of them.

If elected, I would support policies that protect the watershed from mining-related contamination and require rigorous, independent environmental review before any project moves forward. That review must consider not only immediate impacts, but also the long-term risks to water quality, wildlife, and surrounding communities.

We should follow the science, listen to the people who know and care for this region, and put the protection of clean water ahead of short-term political interests. The Boundary Waters belongs to all of us, and we have a responsibility to leave it protected for future generations.”

KEYWORDS: ecosystem protection mining ban

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“Minnesotans deserve clean, safe drinking water. PFAS contamination is a serious concern because these chemicals persist in the environment and can accumulate over time.

I would support stronger standards for PFAS in drinking water, continued testing and monitoring of community water systems, and timely public notification when contamination is found. We should also prioritize preventing PFAS from entering our water in the first place by limiting unnecessary use and holding manufacturers and other responsible parties accountable for contamination and cleanup costs.

At the same time, communities should have the resources they need to address existing contamination. I would support state assistance for testing, filtration, and cleanup, particularly when the cost would otherwise fall on local taxpayers and ratepayers.

My approach is straightforward: follow the science, prevent pollution whenever possible, protect public health, and make sure those responsible for contamination—not ordinary Minnesota families—bear their fair share of the cost.”

KEYWORDS: prevention clean-up accountability

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I am completely unyielding in my opposition to copper-sulfide mining in the watershed of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. The passage of H.J. Res 140 is a devastating blow that strips away vital protections from 225,000 acres of public land, inviting irreversible “acid mine drainage” that can poison our pristine waterways with toxic heavy metals for centuries.

Now that federal shields have been dismantled, the State of Minnesota must act as an aggressive backstop to protect our environment, public health, and outdoor economy from corporate exploitation. I support the following state-level policies to defend the watershed:

State-Level Permanent Mineral Withdrawal: Enacting a state-level ban on copper-sulfide mining within the Rainy River watershed to create a permanent barrier that future congressional maneuvers cannot undo.”

KEYWORDS: Watershed Preservation Promised

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“The presence of toxic “forever chemicals” exceeding safety standards in 21 of our community water systems is a direct public health crisis. While Minnesota has taken steps through Amara’s Law to phase out nonessential PFAS use, we must scale up our response to protect residents’ health right now.

I propose a three-pronged legislative strategy to secure our drinking water:

Clean Water Emergency Funding: Meeting national safety standards will cost local communities heavily. We must establish a state-funded emergency grant program to help cities fast-track advanced filtration systems without passing the bill onto working-class families through skyrocketing water utility rates.

Enforce “Polluter Pays”: Large corporate manufacturers responsible for introducing these toxins into our environment must bear the financial burden of remediation. I support aggressive state legal action to force corporate polluters to pay for long-term water treatment infrastructure.

Choke Off Source Contamination: We must halt PFAS contamination at the source by strictly enforcing disclosures and aggressively restricting the industrial use of intentionally added PFAS unless independent, science-based reviews prove the use is completely unavoidable.”

KEYWORDS: Polluter Pays Principle

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“At a time when the federal government is actively rolling back key environmental protections, it is incumbent upon elected leaders in our State Legislature to take urgent measures and act to protect our watersheds, especially the Boundary Waters, from the threats of toxic mining. Our government should also be forward thinking and take action to ensure that we pass legislation to bring about environmental safeguards and clean water protections: implementing stringent regulations to curb heavy pollution from industry into our groundwater and watersheds, and protecting clean water for future generations to come.

I am proudly endorsed by countless environmental advocacy organizations that work tirelessly to advance clean water protections and champion the preservation of our environment. If re-elected, I will continue to support the brilliant policies brought forward by my colleagues including Prove It First, the Bad Actor Bill, Permanent Protection Bill, Amortization Bill, and the LCCMR / ENRTF package – all legislation that protects our boundary waters and watersheds from pollution and destruction.”

KEYWORDS: take action / permanent protection / protection

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“PFAS is arguably the most dangerous threat to our water and health across the globe. My office will work to protect Amara’s Law: the nation’s most comprehensive ban on PFAS, and protect the current definition of PFAS in Minnesota state statute: “‘Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances’ or ‘PFAS’ means a class of fluorinated organic chemicals containing at least one fully fluorinated carbon atom.”

I will support legislation which would expand upon Amara’s Law to protect our soil, groundwater, and drinking water from further PFAS contamination?

The chemical industry wants many consumer items exempt from Amara’s Law, but I will support protecting current PFAS bans and regulations amidst the onslaught of corporate attempts to receive carve-outs in future sessions.”

KEYWORDS: Amara’s Law / ban / regulations

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“This is very concerning. I worry about a self-sustaining ecosystem and the consequences of water contamination. I think studies should be done asking other countries how they have protected the environment. We used to be Minnesota kind. Look at where we are today. At present we are the land of 10,000 lakes will that still be the case? Will that also be past tense.”

KEYWORDS: Ecosystem

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“I think it is time for facts. We need a student count of the health problems that our youth are facing. Then we need to get the facts on who and why. Can a better alternative be found? Slow down and research the decision first.”

KEYWORDS: Contamination the cannot be reversed is my concern.

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“Minnesota’s environment and natural resources are among our greatest assets, and they deserve careful stewardship. Mining has long been an important part of our economy, providing good-paying jobs and supporting communities across the state. I support responsible mining projects that meet rigorous, science-based environmental standards. Any project affecting the Boundary Waters watershed should undergo independent environmental review, continuous water-quality monitoring, strong financial assurances for cleanup, and meaningful public engagement. If credible scientific evidence demonstrates an unacceptable risk to the watershed or surrounding ecosystems, the project should not move forward. We should invest in cleaner mining technologies and modern environmental protections so Minnesota can remain both an environmental leader and a leader in responsible resource development.”

KEYWORDS: Stewardship, Responsible Mining, Science

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“Every Minnesotan deserves access to safe drinking water. PFAS contamination is a serious public health issue that requires prevention, accountability, and long-term investment. I support expanding statewide water testing, identifying contamination early, assisting communities with treatment infrastructure, and accelerating cleanup of affected sites. Companies responsible for contamination should be held financially accountable whenever permitted under the law. Minnesota should continue supporting research into effective PFAS treatment technologies while strengthening regulations that prevent future contamination. By combining sound science, responsible regulation, and targeted investment, we can protect public health without placing unnecessary burdens on local communities or taxpayers.”

KEYWORDS: Clean Water, Prevention, Accountability

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“Continue ban. Full, transparent, environmental review.”

KEYWORDS: thorough, regulated, transparent

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“Monitoring and oversite”

KEYWORDS: Safety First

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I support prove it first policies and believe that mining should only happen where it can be done safely and consistent with the highest environmental standards. I’m proud to be endorsed by Save the Boundary Waters and Friends of the Boundary Waters organizations.”

KEYWORDS: Clean water, clear air, natural habitat

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“I support overturning the EPAs recent rollback of regulations on PFAS and support the proposed polices of Clean Water Action to stop PFAS at the point of origin and to strengthen state regulations on PFAS/forever chemicals.”

KEYWORDS: EPA, Clean Water Action Policies

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I am not against mining. Iron Range miners built this district and I want mining jobs here. But H.J. Res 140 is not about American mining. Twin Metals is owned by Antofagasta, a Chilean conglomerate. The minerals would likely be processed in Chinese-owned smelters. The President signed an executive order treating critical minerals as a national security issue. Handing our copper and nickel to a foreign firm feeding China’s supply chain contradicts that order. Pete Stauber sponsored this resolution. Look at his donor list and ask who he was working for. The Boundary Waters is a national treasure and an economic engine. Sulfide-ore mining in that watershed carries acid drainage risk that lasts generations. Water flows north into the wilderness. You do not get a second chance with that. My position: no sulfide-ore mining in the Rainy River watershed until independent science proves it can be done without polluting it, and the burden of proof sits on the mining company. American-owned projects outside sensitive watersheds should get faster permits, not slower. Protect the water, put Americans first in our own mines, and make Congress answer to voters instead of mining PACs.”

KEYWORDS: Antofagasta, foreign ownership, national security

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“PFAS was invented in Minnesota. 3M made these chemicals for decades while knowing the risks, and now 21 Minnesota community water systems exceed federal limits. Families drank that water. That is not a partisan issue. It is a poisoning issue. I live on well water. My family eats what we grow and drinks what comes out of the ground. Clean water is not an environmental slogan to me. It is dinner. My policies are simple. First, polluter pays. The companies that made and dumped PFAS fund the cleanup and the filtration, not the ratepayers and not the taxpayers. Second, fund testing for private wells, because rural families are on their own right now. Third, stop new PFAS from entering products where safer alternatives exist. Fourth, hold the Pentagon to the same cleanup standards as everyone else on contaminated bases. In 2021 the House voted on the PFAS Action Act to set drinking water standards and force cleanup. Pete Stauber voted no. Check his donor list, then check that vote. I take no PAC money, so when the polluter and the water bill are on opposite sides, I am free to side with the water.”

KEYWORDS: clean drinking water, 3M, PFAS Action Act

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“The Boundary Waters is a national treasure, and any activity in its watershed must meet strict standards that protect clean water and local communities. I support responsible resource development, but only when independent review shows it will not harm the region’s lakes, rivers, or long‑term economic stability. Mining plays an important role in energy and manufacturing, yet this specific area is uniquely sensitive and requires extra caution.

I support policies that require rigorous environmental review, strong financial assurance from companies, and clear, science‑based safeguards to protect the watershed. Minnesota should not accept projects that leave taxpayers responsible for cleanup or put a world‑class ecosystem at risk. Responsible development is possible, but protecting the Boundary Waters must remain the priority.”

KEYWORDS: Clean water protection, responsible development, Science‑based safeguards

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“PFAS contamination is a serious issue, and Minnesotans deserve clean, safe drinking water. I support a balanced approach that protects public health while ensuring that regulations are clear and practical. My priority is holding polluters accountable rather than placing unnecessary burdens on families, farmers, or small businesses.

I would support policies that strengthen monitoring of PFAS in community water systems, require companies to fully disclose the chemicals they use, and ensure that manufacturers not taxpayers pay for cleanup when contamination occurs. I also back investments in modern water treatment technology and partnerships with local governments to upgrade aging infrastructure.

Protecting residents from PFAS is essential, but it must be done in a way that supports both public health and long-term economic stability.”

KEYWORDS: Clean water protection, Accountability for polluters, Science based monitoring

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“Minnesota can support good-paying mining jobs while also being thoughtful about where and how mining projects move forward. The Boundary Waters is one of Minnesota’s greatest natural treasures, and any proposal that could affect its watershed deserves especially careful scrutiny. I would listen closely to scientists, environmental experts, workers, local communities, Tribal Nations, businesses, and other stakeholders in the region before making decisions about proposed mining projects. We need to take potential risks to clean water seriously while also recognizing the importance of mining jobs and economic opportunity in northern Minnesota.

My priority would be making sure decisions are based on the best available science, strong environmental safeguards, and a transparent process that gives the people who live and work in the region a meaningful voice. Protecting the Boundary Waters, supporting local economies, and creating good-paying jobs should not be treated as mutually exclusive goals.”

KEYWORDS: Protect, Clean Water, Conservation

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“Minnesotans should be able to turn on their faucet without worrying whether their water is making their family sick. I support an aggressive approach to PFAS that focuses first on preventing contamination, while helping communities address pollution that has already occurred. Minnesota has begun phasing out nonessential uses of PFAS through Amara’s Law, and I support fully implementing and enforcing those protections. I would also support continued statewide testing, assistance for communities and private well owners, investments in treatment infrastructure, and holding responsible polluters, not local taxpayers, accountable for cleanup costs. We should also continue developing Minnesota health and water-quality standards based on the best available science, even if federal protections are weakened. The Minnesota Department of Health has identified community water systems exceeding federal PFAS standards, making this an immediate infrastructure and public-health issue, not a theoretical future concern.”

KEYWORDS: Prevention, Clean Water, Accountability

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I have committed to supporting a ban on mining within the Boundary Waters watershed. This is a uniquely sensitive and valuable natural area, and protecting its water quality must come before mining proposals that could create long-term environmental risks. I would support reinstating the 20-year ban on new mining in the watershed and working toward permanent protections. I would also support rigorous environmental review, consultation with Tribal nations, strong water-quality protections, ongoing monitoring, and financial-assurance requirements so taxpayers are never left responsible for cleanup. In this region, the potential consequences of pollution are too serious and too lasting. We have a responsibility to protect this resource for future generations.”

KEYWORDS: Science, Stewardship, Future

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“Every Minnesotan deserves safe drinking water. I would support a comprehensive PFAS strategy focused on prevention, testing, treatment, and accountability. Minnesota should continue phasing out nonessential PFAS uses under Amara’s Law and avoid loopholes that allow preventable contamination to continue. Stopping PFAS at the source is more effective and affordable than relying on communities to remove it later. I would expand monitoring of public water systems and private wells, require clear public notification, and provide state grants, bonding, and technical assistance for filtration systems, replacement wells, and other remediation. Communities should not have to choose between safe water and unaffordable utility bills. Because drinking water is only one source of PFAS exposure, treatment must be paired with broader pollution-prevention policies. I also support strong discharge standards and polluter-pays policies so responsible companies, rather than residents and taxpayers, bear cleanup costs. As a city council member, I understand the infrastructure burdens PFAS creates for local governments, and my Ph.D. in design and sustainability taught me to evaluate environmental decisions across their full life cycle.”

KEYWORDS: Prevention, Safety, Accountability

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I oppose mining in the Boundary Waters watershed. I support restoring permanent protections for the federal lands surrounding the Boundary Waters. At the state level, I support the Boundary Waters Permanent Protection Bill and the Prove-It-First Bill.”

KEYWORDS: clean water, permanent protections, polluteer accountability

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“I support passing enforceable standards for PFAS in drinking water and wastewater; statewide testing and public reporting; testing and remediation assistance for private well owners; phasing out nonessential uses of PFAS; and a PFAS cleanup fund that requires PFAS manufacturers and sellers to help pay for testing and cleanup.”

KEYWORDS: PFAS prevention, statewide testing, public reporting, polluter accountability, cleanup funding

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

Sen. Klobuchar provided this letter to the Minnesota Stance on Science team.

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

Sen. Klobuchar provided this letter to the Minnesota Stance on Science team.

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I support protecting the Boundary Waters and its surrounding watershed from mining projects that pose an unacceptable risk of long-term or irreversible contamination. Mining provides jobs and resources that matter to Minnesota, particularly in northern communities, so I don’t believe the conversation should dismiss workers or communities that depend on the industry. But some places are simply too valuable and too difficult to restore once damaged, to gamble with.

I support strong, science-based environmental review, rigorous water-quality protections, meaningful financial assurance so taxpayers are never left paying for cleanup, and long-term monitoring and accountability for mining companies. I also support lasting protections for the watershed surrounding the Boundary Waters, because pollution does not stop at the edge of a mine site or a political boundary. Economic development and environmental protection do not have to be enemies, but when the potential damage could outlast the economic benefit by generations, we have a responsibility to proceed with extraordinary caution.”

KEYWORDS: Protection. Accountability. Sustainability.

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“Minnesotans should be able to trust that their drinking water is safe. I support strong PFAS testing and monitoring, transparent reporting, and continued efforts to prevent these chemicals from entering our water.

Minnesota has already taken important steps to restrict unnecessary uses of PFAS. We should continue those protections while helping communities afford the infrastructure and treatment needed to remove existing contamination, particularly in rural areas where resources are limited.

I also believe polluters (not taxpayers) should pay when contamination can be traced to responsible manufacturers or industries. Families and local governments should not bear the financial burden of cleaning up pollution they did not create.

Clean water is fundamental to public health. Our approach should prioritize prevention, early detection, cleanup, and accountability.”

KEYWORDS: Prevention. Accountability. Clean Water.

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“While we have come a long way in the technology and techniques when it comes to this kind of mining, I think it still needs more advancement before we consider mining that close to the Boundary Waters. I do not agree with having someone else be the guinea pig in these cases so I am against legislation that says someone else needs to try it first. I would need clear proof that the mining would have an extremely low or no impact on the boundary waters.”

KEYWORDS: Advancement, NIMBY, Proof

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“We need to invest in the study, creation, and implementation of technology or systems that can begin to clean PFAS from our water. We also need to do the same to prevent more PFAS from entering the water in the first place.”

KEYWORDS: Advancement, Prevention, Implementation

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I support environmentally safe mining.”

KEYWORDS: envirentally safe

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“Pursue the poluters, make them pay for restoration, and enforce laws to protect us going forward.”

KEYWORDS: poluters pay, protection

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I’d support responsible mining only if the project passed strict, science-based environmental reviews and demonstrated clear benefits. I’d prioritize protection of the watershed through robust buffers, continuous water quality monitoring, meaningful tribal consultation and enforceable safeguards. If those standards can’t be met, the project shouldn’t proceed.”

KEYWORDS: Science Based Stewardship

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“I support a comprehensive approach to PFAS contamination that prioritizes safe drinking water and public health. That includes regular testing of public water systems, transparent reporting of contamination levels, targeted funding to help communities install effective treatment technologies and holding polluters accountable when contamination can be traced to responsible parties. I also support reducing future PFAS releases through practical regulations and continued investment in research and safer alternatives.”

KEYWORDS: Science Based Prevention

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“Protect what we need most, water being one of them. There have been new advancements and thoughts in how we can use alternate sources of energy and the use of our finite resources. We should invest in new ways to provide purpose and healthy competition as we find and use healthier means of our resources. As an endorsed candidate of the Friends of the Boundary Waters I will proudly protect our waters and rely on science over”

KEYWORDS: Essential, Impactful, Consequential

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“I propose we hold entities who contribute and cause the levels above regulation to be fiscally responsible to invest in ways to lower the levels while holding those who made the decisions, accountable for the choices they made. I’d also be open to working with the AG to create ways to compensate those also affected by the contamination.”

KEYWORDS: Law, Order, and Accountability

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“The Boundary Waters is an irreplaceable Minnesota resource, and I strongly support Governor Walz’s recent executive action protecting the Boundary Waters watershed from nonferrous mining. But an executive order is not a substitute for durable protection. I support legislation establishing permanent protections against sulfide-ore mining in the Boundary Waters watershed unless and until credible, peer-reviewed scientific evidence demonstrates that it can be done without jeopardizing the watershed.

The Boundary Waters is an interconnected ecosystem, and contamination upstream could cause damage that is extraordinarily difficult, if not impossible, to reverse. When the potential consequences are that significant and permanent, our policy should reflect the science and the risk. Minnesota can support mining and economic development in appropriate places while recognizing that some natural resources are too valuable to gamble with.”

KEYWORDS: Boundary Waters, Science-Based, Permanent Protection

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“Minnesotans should not have to wonder whether the water coming from their tap is safe. I support continued statewide PFAS monitoring, transparent public reporting, assistance for communities that must upgrade drinking-water treatment systems, and strong enforcement against significant sources of PFAS contamination. Minnesota should also continue reducing unnecessary uses of PFAS so that we are not simply paying to remove these chemicals from water after they have already entered the environment. Importantly, the financial burden of contamination should not fall primarily on homeowners and local ratepayers. State policy should continue applying the principle that those responsible for pollution bear an appropriate share of the cleanup costs.”

KEYWORDS: Clean Water, Prevention, Polluter Accountability

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I strongly oppose efforts to weaken protections around the Boundary Waters. This is one of Minnesota’s greatest natural treasures, and once that kind of ecosystem is damaged, we can’t undo it. I believe we need to follow the science and listen to environmental experts who have made it clear that sulfide mining in this region poses a serious risk to clean water, wildlife, and the outdoor economy so many Minnesotans rely on. I would support reinstating and strengthening the mining ban, protecting the watershed through permanent federal safeguards, and investing in sustainable economic opportunities for the region. We can create good-paying jobs without putting our lakes and forests at risk”

KEYWORDS: Environmental stewardship, Protect the Boundary Waters, Sustainable development, Preserve Minnesota’s lakes and forests

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“PFAS contamination is a serious public health issue, and Minnesotans deserve clean, safe drinking water, no exceptions. I support strong, enforceable limits on PFAS based on the best available science, along with holding polluters accountable for cleanup costs so taxpayers aren’t left footing the bill. We need to invest in water treatment infrastructure, expand statewide testing, and ensure transparency so residents know what’s in their water. I also support phasing out non-essential uses of PFAS and strengthening regulations to prevent future contamination. This is about protecting our families, our health, and our environment. Clean water is a basic right, and I will fight to make sure every community in Minnesota can trust what comes out of their tap.”

KEYWORDS: Water quality protection, Invest in green infrastructure

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I believe in protecting our beautiful State of Minnesota, and our environment from harmful mining practices which include financial benefits, harmful chemicals and gasses that disrupt the natural cycles of earth we live on, also this effect all animals too.”

KEYWORDS: We should continue to implement the ban to protect the kand, and thise whoe live near it.

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“We as a state should support eliminating PFAS, by continuing testing, eliminating products that carry high levels of PFAS, plastics, do more of organic materials, paper products, and glass as safer alternatives.”

KEYWORDS: Eliminate harmful products, improve quality of life

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I believe that the Boundary Waters should be protected from extractive mining. Our children deserve to grow up with the same great outdoors that we did, and the proposed mine poses a significant risk to the BWCA. We know that mining activity poses a huge environmental risk based on decades of experience. I would support restoring and expanding the 20-year ban.”

KEYWORDS: Boundary Waters, Preservation. Protection, Extractive Mining

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“I want strong protections around Minnesota’s drinking water and I want the companies responsible for putting forever chemicals into our water and environment to pay to clean them up. I would explore ways of making that happen. I would also support measures to expand testing in areas that need it.”

KEYWORDS: Environment, PFAS, Forever Chemicals, Clean Up

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I don’t believe we should be mining in areas where there is extreme risk for environmental disaster. Couple that with the fact that industrial mining can hurt tourism which helps to drive the economies of small towns. There are locations around the U.S. that would be much better candidates for large industrial mining operations.”

KEYWORDS: N/A

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“It’s a two pronged approach. On the prevention side we need to advocate for less plastic waste and more recycling options and operations. Secondly we employ bold civil engineering to go beyond wide spread clean up efforts. Forever chemicals and PFAS will not come out of the water unless we filter it out. I believe in hyper-industrialization that actually works with and aids our environment, and it really is the only way to keep up with what our modern society demands.”

KEYWORDS: N/A

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I support the schools using their land for generating income to fund teachers and students, build state of the art schools, and to educate our kids. At the heart of much of the debate is the millions of acres of valuable mining and timber land the schools own. For mining in any location, the mine must purchase an appropriate insurance bond to offset any environmental damage. If this is $5 billion dollars - then make them buy that size bond. The insurance company will have inspectors camped out 24/7 ensuring there is no damage to the environment. If the mining process is too risky to the environment, no insurance company will insure them. If approved, the mine owners will constantly work to improve the process to lower risk, and with it, the premiums paid for the bond. Additionally, the use of a private bond will ensure government bureaucrats are not paid off to look the other way. If we cannot mine here, under the strictest environmental standards in the world, we shouldn’t be mandating electric vehicles where 65% of the battery is nickel and where it is destroying the environment for millions of people in developing nations.”

KEYWORDS: Responsibility Financial Accountability

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“Product and corporate liability should be the hallmark of a free market. We should NEVER allow our government to provide civil and/or criminal immunity to manufacturers. In the MN Legislature, I have been a champion of calling out crony capitalism and have authored resolutions calling for eliminating such immunity our government has granted to corporations and their executives. Outside the legislature, the executive branch is responsible for prosecuting those who harm others and the environment and the role of the judiciary branch to weigh in.”

KEYWORDS: Do No Harm

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“The Boundary Waters is one of our greatest natural treasures. I support a prove it first approach. Any mining proposal must demonstrate it can be done safely without harming clean water. Science based review, strong environmental protections, and Tribal consultation should guide every decision.”

KEYWORDS: Prove it First, Clean Water, Science Based

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“Minnesota has already taken national leadership by banning intentionally added PFAS in products through Amara’s Law, with protections phasing in through 2032. I support full implementation, strong reporting requirements, testing and cleanup of contaminated drinking water, and holding polluters accountable so families have safe, clean water.”

KEYWORDS: Ban, Cleanup, Accountability

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“Overturning the 20 year mining band was a significant blow to this beautiful area. Twin Metals which is a subsidiary of a Chilean mining company, is looking for profits over environmental protections. While I want good paying jobs in the region, we also need to look at protecting our most valuable resource here in Minnesota: our water. I was support legislation to protect the watershed and to ban mining in the Boundary Waters.”

KEYWORDS: Valuable resource

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“PFAS have major health risks associated with exposure. The chemicals travel from industrial processes up and down the region. The way that the legislation was written was that there could be no future bans on mining. This is unacceptable. We must regulate significantly around environmental protections and mining in the boundary waters.”

KEYWORDS: Environmental harm

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“That’s a delicate answer. I believe that we should allow mining, however I also believe in the protection of our lands and water. I would want more information.”

KEYWORDS: Need More Info

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“I do believe it is the responsibility to provide clean drinking water and would stand with any legislation that would agree with that.”

KEYWORDS: clean drinking water

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I would support all of the tailings from mining be stored in a waste cavern with an impermeable rock layer between the tailings and the water table. No open pit mine can return the surface to the previous topography nor ensure leaching of sulfates will not occur. Otherwise no sulfide mining should be allowed in or near a wilderness area.”

KEYWORDS: Legacy, assurance, proof

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“Policies to protect Minnesota residents from well chemical contamination include testing of the water, monitor well testing around industrial sights and supplying clean water to anyone that could be harmed. Clean up of the aquifer is a long term process of pumping ground water out down stream and disposing of the contaminated water where it can do no harm. The cleaning process should be pursued whenever possible.”

KEYWORDS: Prevent, Identify, protect

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“Mining industries in the US have a horrendous track record of despoiling the environment and leaving behind the mess for the public to clean up. Any mining project that is proposed should be subject to strict scrutiny by independent environmental experts, not industry lobbyists. Natural resources belong to all people, and those extracting them have the responsibility to do so without impacting the environment negatively.”

KEYWORDS: Independent Experts

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“If this is the case, we need to increase our efforts at detecting these chemical pollutants and tracking down their sources (by hiring appropriate environmental experts). Industries need to pay for the cleanup of the messes they cause and substantial fines (as percentages of revenue) need to be levied against them if they continue, so they don’t write off the minor fines they pay now as “cost of doing business”.”

KEYWORDS: Detect, Trace, Fine

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“Question is can we mine for critical minerals and still able to protect the environment, can we do both? I think we have the technologies that we can do both, Canada is mining on the other side currently. If we don’t mine these minerals in Minnesota, China is mining them in Africa using slave labor, and selling the minerals to the world. Do we want to encourage that?”

KEYWORDS: Technology, Environmental, America

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“I believe we won the law suit against 3M and asking 3M to clean up the contaminations, correct? I believe we have existing policies to protect our residents from these forever chemicals, we should just enforce them. If the CEO and the Board at the time knew about the contamination at 3M and didn’t do anything about it, I want to hold them accountable.”

KEYWORDS: Mike Roman accountability

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“As a farm girl, I understand the value of clean water and healthy land. I will do everything I can to protect the Boundary Waters because clean water is one of our greatest resources. As someone running for office, I believe it is my responsibility to protect what God has given us and keep it clean and safe for future generations.”

KEYWORDS: ENVIRONMENT SHOULD BE PROTECTED

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“I learned the importance of protecting our soil, water, and land. PFAS contamination threatens the health of our families and future generations. I support stronger protections, holding polluters accountable, and ensuring clean drinking water for every Minnesotan. We must protect the resources God gave us and keep them safe for our children and grandchildren.”

KEYWORDS: protect the environment

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I believe protecting our boundary waters and the waters of our state is of utmost importance while we continue to evolve and innovate job opportunities for the workers in our state. I believe both can happen if we look at additional opportunities outside the BWCA and explore upskilling programs for our workers.”

KEYWORDS: Protect. Innovate. Upskill.

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“I support any policy that reduces single-use plastics and PFAS in our environment. I recognize this is an enormous environmental issue and would work with experts in the area to produce effective legislation.”

KEYWORDS: Reduce, Refer, Protect

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“Water in northern Minnesota belongs to everyone downstream. When sulfide ore is exposed to air and water it produces acid drainage that carries heavy metals, and no one has a site anywhere that has done this cleanly. The Rainy River watershed runs north into the Boundary Waters, Voyageurs, and Canada; a failure there is permanent and shared.

My position is no sulfide mining in this watershed. I would support a state prohibition on nonferrous sulfide mining in the Rainy River headwaters, which is authority Minnesota holds regardless of what Congress does with federal land.

I would also support restoring the federal mineral withdrawal, full financial assurance posted in cash or its equivalent before any permit issues anywhere in the state, with no self-bonding and no corporate parent guarantees that vanish in bankruptcy, state-funded independent water monitoring, protection of the wild rice sulfate standard, and thorough consultation with the Ojibwe bands who hold treaty rights to hunt, fish, and gather in the ceded territory.

Northern Minnesota deserves an economy that pays well and lasts. I want the public investment aimed at work that does not put the water at risk.”

KEYWORDS: Sulfide mining prohibition, Financial assurance, Watershed protection

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“Nobody should have to research their own drinking water to find out whether it is safe.

Minnesota already has the strongest PFAS law in the country in Amara’s Law, including the class-based definition covering any chemical with at least one fully fluorinated carbon. I would defend that definition and vote against the industry carve-outs that will be brought forward as the deadlines get closer.

Beyond that, I would push in four directions. Enforceable state drinking water standards for PFAS, with compliance deadlines that do not slip. Testing money and treatment money for the small rural, tribal, and township systems that cannot spread the cost of a filtration plant across many ratepayers. Coverage for private wells, which is how a large share of households in my district get their water and which no federal standard reaches. Limits on PFAS in biosolids and sludge applied to farmland, plus soil and groundwater standards, so we stop moving the contamination around.

The cost belongs to whoever made and sold these chemicals. I would support strengthening state cost recovery so manufacturers pay for testing, treatment, and health monitoring, and Minnesota families get clean water without a new line on their bill.”

KEYWORDS: Amara’s Law, Private wells, Polluter pays

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I understand it brings jobs, but we have to be cautious of the environmental damage and pollution it can cause especially to our waters. It’s extremely important to have clean waters. Since it has already passed, I would propose policies to require any mining companies in the area to clean after themselves. Keep the waters clean and if there is an ounce of pollution in the water, the mining company will be sued and required to clean up the water in the area.”

KEYWORDS: A healthy Environment = Clean food, Clean food = Healthy foods, Healthy food = wealthy state.

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“Force the companies that caused the forever chemicals to be in the water to clean the water. if not they will be sued and cease to operate in MN.”

KEYWORDS: A healthy Environment = Clean food, Clean food = Healthy foods, Healthy food = wealthy state.

Q2 Recently H.J. Res 140 passed, overturning a 20-year mining ban in the National Forest System land surrounding the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. What is your position on mining projects in this region and what policies, if any, would you support to protect the surrounding watershed?

“I want to protect preserved nature at all costs. I would definitely oppose anything that could risk other life forms we have never and will never have the right to take.”

KEYWORDS: Protect the environment over profits

Q3 Contamination from PFAS and other “forever chemicals” in 21 community water systems in Minnesota exceed national regulations, putting residents at risk of negative health impacts. What policies, if any, do you propose to protect Minnesota residents from the potential impacts of PFAS?

“It’s not too much to ask that we mandate use of new science that allows people to recycle water and have their own closed cooling systems. I would push to update science in a republican way. Keith Ellison will lose a lawsuit and gripe, I’ll vote to give financial incentives to companies that update their systems in order to protect the environment. Why is the democratic stance of suing businesses for doing business they initially allowed presented as scientific? Nonsense.”

KEYWORDS: Democrats are generally dumber and poorly educated, either that or lying evil people

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“I have over 25 years of experience with Mental Health and Chemical Dependency cases in Hennepin County District Court. Continue treatment funding, case management inside and outside of treatment facilities, and community education”

KEYWORDS: treatment management education

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“Disparities in overdose mortality require a pragmatic, results-oriented strategy focused on what works. I support expanding access to lifesaving overdose reversal tools like naloxone, increasing funding for community-led and culturally specific recovery programs in direct partnership with Tribal Nations and Urban Indian health organizations, and cutting red tape to expand outpatient addiction medicine and peer recovery specialists across Hennepin County and underserved communities.”

KEYWORDS: Recovery, Harm-Reduction, Local-Partnerships

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“Minnesota should continue reducing overdose deaths by treating substance-use disorder as a public-health issue while holding illegal drug traffickers accountable.

I support expanding access to naloxone, including through schools, first responders, libraries, treatment providers, and community organizations. We must also improve access to evidence-based treatment, mental-health services, recovery programs, stable housing, and follow-up care after a nonfatal overdose.

The severe disparities affecting Indigenous and Black Minnesotans require targeted solutions developed with those communities. Funding should support Tribal Nations and trusted local organizations that understand cultural needs and can connect people with treatment before a crisis occurs. Minnesota should use overdose data to direct resources toward communities experiencing the greatest harm.

Prevention must begin early through honest education, responsible prescribing, and support for families. People in recovery should be treated with dignity and given a real opportunity to rebuild their lives. Our policies should be measured by whether they save lives and make treatment easier to reach.”

KEYWORDS: Prevention, Treatment, Equity

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“Minnesota’s progress in reducing overdose deaths is encouraging, but we cannot be satisfied while some communities continue to experience dramatically higher rates of fatal overdose. The disparities affecting Indigenous and Black Minnesotans reflect longstanding inequities in access to healthcare, treatment, mental health services, and other resources, compounded by a history of discrimination in our healthcare and public systems.

I support expanding accessible, culturally responsive substance-use treatment, mental healthcare, recovery services, and harm-reduction resources in underserved communities. This includes making lifesaving medications such as naloxone readily available and ensuring people can get help before they reach a crisis.

We also need to address the underlying barriers that keep people from care—including cost, transportation, provider shortages, and lack of culturally responsive services. I would work with Tribal Nations, Black communities, healthcare providers, and people with lived experience to develop solutions rather than assuming a one-size-fits-all approach.

We should continue using data and evidence to evaluate what works and hold ourselves accountable for reducing—not simply documenting—these disparities. Every Minnesotan deserves the opportunity to live a healthy life and access care when they need it.”

KEYWORDS: culturally-responsive accessibility inequity

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“While Minnesota’s overall decline in fatal overdoses is a major step forward, the stark racial disparities show that our current safety nets are failing our Indigenous and Black neighbors. To ensure the downward trend reaches every community, I support targeted, culturally localized public health policies. First, we must directly empower Tribal Nations and Black-led community organizations by establishing decentralized, stable state funding. This will allow local leaders to expand mobile harm reduction units and establish culturally specific peer-recovery networks right where they are needed most.Second, I support standardizing comprehensive addiction care and evidence-based medicine across all regional correctional systems. Because individuals released from correctional facilities face a tragically elevated risk of overdose, we must build seamless continuity of care as they transition back into our communities. Finally, I will advocate for widespread community access to critical, life-saving resources—like naloxone saturation programs and drug-checking test strips—to counter emerging, hyper-potent synthetic adulterants. By removing corporate and bureaucratic barriers to healthcare, we can shield family budgets and save lives.”

KEYWORDS: Universal Healthcare Resources

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“I have been a prominent advocate for overdose prevention, including authoring 2021 state legislation that successfully decriminalized fentanyl test strips in Minnesota. I have consistently used my platform to advocate for harm-reduction strategies such as legislative action & advocacy

My bill to exempt fentanyl test strips from drug paraphernalia laws was credited with allowing community organizations to distribute over 100,000 strips to help users identify potentially lethal drugs and take overdose-prevention measures. I have frequently spoken out about the devastating impacts of the opioid crisis, particularly the dangers of fentanyl flooding the state, and next session we must continue to push for wider access to life-saving overdose medications like naloxone.”

KEYWORDS: prevention / advocacy / harm-reduction

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“Border security, mail security, US random highway checks for drug trafficking 90 and 35. Stricter border checks between the U>S> and Canada. Both governments working together to target drug trafficking.”

KEYWORDS: Working with other states and countries.

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“Minnesota’s recent decline in overdose deaths is encouraging, but every life lost is one too many. I support expanding access to mental health care, substance use treatment, medication-assisted treatment, recovery housing, peer support, and overdose prevention resources such as naloxone. We must continue disrupting fentanyl trafficking while recognizing that addiction is both a public health and public safety challenge. I also support community-based partnerships that improve outreach and treatment in populations experiencing disproportionately high overdose rates, including Indigenous and Black Minnesotans. Success will require better coordination between healthcare providers, social services, law enforcement, and local communities. Our goal should be to save lives, strengthen families, and help people recover so they can fully participate in Minnesota’s economy and communities.”

KEYWORDS: Prevention, Recovery, Public Health

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“Decriminalization, return funding”

KEYWORDS: Love your neighbor.

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“I support funding for treatment over simple incarceration and want to continue investing in helping our homeless population get more support and outreach, due to the overwhelming impacts of alcohol and addiction on this population. I also support many harm reduction policies promoted by addiction recovery advocates.”

KEYWORDS: Harm reduction, treatment over incarceration

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“Every one of those numbers is a neighbor. The Eighth District is home to several Ojibwe nations, so the disparity in your question is not a statistic to me. It is families in my district burying their kids. The decline proves something works. Naloxone saves lives, so keep it cheap and everywhere, including schools, bars, and squad cars. Treatment works when you can actually get it, so my first priority is rural access. In much of my district the nearest detox bed or medication-assisted treatment provider is an hour or more away. That kills people. Second, fund tribal nations directly. Tribes run some of the most effective recovery programs in Minnesota because they built them for their own communities. Money should go straight to them, not through layers of agencies that skim and slow it. Third, hit supply hard. Fentanyl traffickers and the Chinese precursor pipeline deserve prosecution, not the addict who needs a bed. Fourth, follow the evidence. If a program saves lives, fund it. If it does not, cut it. I take no pharmaceutical PAC money, so I can back what works instead of what pays.”

KEYWORDS: naloxone, rural treatment access, tribal nations

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“We need to continue policies that save lives while strengthening public safety. I support an approach that focuses on treatment access, community partnerships, and accountability for those who traffic dangerous drugs.

I would back efforts to expand evidence-based treatment, improve coordination between state agencies, tribal communities and support local programs that have proven effective in reducing overdoses. Strengthening access to mental health services, recovery housing, and rapid response teams can help keep this downward trend moving.

Law enforcement also plays a critical role. I support giving officers and first responders the tools they need to disrupt fentanyl trafficking, respond quickly to overdoses, and keep dangerous substances out of our communities.

We should continue investing in strategies that work, especially in communities facing the highest risks. The goal is simple: fewer deaths, stronger families, and safer neighborhoods across the state.”

KEYWORDS: Treatment access, Community safety, Evidence based programs

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“The decline in overdose deaths is encouraging, but we should not declare victory while hundreds of Minnesota families continue losing loved ones, especially when Indigenous and Black Minnesotans remain disproportionately affected. Minnesota’s own data show particularly severe racial disparities in overdose mortality. I support continuing broad access to naloxone, expanding medication-assisted treatment and same-day connections to care, supporting recovery services and housing, and investing opioid-settlement dollars in evidence-based prevention and treatment. Minnesota currently provides mechanisms for organizations to distribute naloxone, and those lifesaving programs should continue.”

KEYWORDS: Naloxone, Treatment, Equity

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“I support a comprehensive public health approach that combines prevention, treatment, harm reduction, and accountability. Minnesota should expand access to naloxone, including through schools, libraries, first responders, community organizations, and treatment providers, while ensuring people know how to use it. We should also strengthen access to medication-assisted treatment, mental health care, recovery housing, and peer support, especially in rural and underserved communities. The severe disparities affecting Indigenous and Black Minnesotans require targeted action. I would support culturally responsive programs developed in partnership with Tribal nations, Black-led organizations, local public health departments, and people with lived experience. Funding should follow the data and support all people who struggle with substance use. I also support stronger efforts to disrupt fentanyl trafficking, improve prescription monitoring, and expand early intervention and substance-use education. As someone who has worked with justice-involved veterans experiencing mental health and substance-use challenges, I understand that punishment alone does not solve addiction. Minnesota should focus on saving lives, removing barriers to treatment, and helping people achieve long-term recovery.”

KEYWORDS: Prevention, Treatment, Equity

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“I support continued funding for naloxone access, harm reduction, medication-assisted treatment, recovery services, and overdose prevention education. We should also expand treatment and mental health services in rural areas, where distance and provider shortages remain major barriers. Because Indigenous and Black Minnesotans face much higher overdose death rates, opioid-settlement and state funding should prioritize Tribal nations and culturally specific, community-led programs.”

KEYWORDS: harm reduction, treatment access, rural healthcare, culturally specific programs

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

Sen. Klobuchar provided this letter to the Minnesota Stance on Science team.

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“Minnesota’s decline in overdose deaths shows that evidence-based prevention and treatment can save lives, but significant disparities and gaps in access remain.

I support expanding access to naloxone, evidence-based treatment for substance use disorder, mental health services, recovery programs, and harm-reduction strategies. Treatment must also be accessible when someone is ready to seek it…not weeks or months later because there are no available providers or beds.

In rural Minnesota, access is particularly important. Distance, transportation, provider shortages, cost, and stigma can all become barriers to recovery. We should strengthen rural treatment options, telehealth, peer recovery programs, and community-based services.

We also need targeted partnerships with Indigenous and Black communities experiencing disproportionately high overdose deaths, with solutions developed alongside those communities rather than imposed upon them.

Accountability for illegal drug trafficking remains important, but we cannot arrest our way out of addiction. People struggling with substance use disorder need healthcare, treatment, and a realistic path toward recovery.

The first goal is keeping people alive. Then we must make sure treatment and long-term recovery support are there when they need them.”

KEYWORDS: Prevention. Treatment. Recovery.

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“We should take what has been working, I’m assuming here that the decline is due to some sort of change in either how drug issues are treated or cared for, and make sure that Indigenous and Black Minnesotans also have access to them. Treatments and help needs to be available and affordable to everyone.”

KEYWORDS: Availability, affordability, Everyone

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“Strong law enforcement to remove those who sell illegal narcotics, work with private mental health and addiction care centers to treat addiction, education in all communities.”

KEYWORDS: law enforcement, treatment

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“I support a comprehensive approach to reducing overdose deaths that combines prevention, treatment, recovery and public safety. This includes expanding access to evidence-based addiction treatment, increasing the availability of overdose reversal medications such as the naloxone, strengthening mental health services and disrupting the trafficking of fentanyl and other illicit drugs. I also support improving community outreach and ensuring that prevention and treatment resources are accessible to populations experiencing disproportionately high overdose rates. The goal is to save lives, support long-term recovery and reduce the impact of addiction across all Minnesota communities.”

KEYWORDS: Recovery - Prevention - Enforcement

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“I feel we should provide the resources needed to counter the reasons that lead to the use rather than control and punish those for the use. I also support efforts to educate and prevent using as we should properly label the risks of legal substances too. Alcohol is often ignored when it comes to drug usage as cannabis is becoming easily accessible and marketable to younger generations. We should continue to support the organizations who currently educate and do the good work to help those in need.”

KEYWORDS: Resources, Education, and Support

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“The recent decline in overdose deaths is encouraging, but the significant racial disparities show that Minnesota’s work is far from finished. I support maintaining broad access to naloxone, evidence-based substance-use treatment, medications for opioid use disorder, mental-health services, and harm-reduction programs that help keep people alive long enough to recover. We should also invest in culturally responsive and community-led programs, particularly in Indigenous and Black communities experiencing disproportionately high overdose rates. Treatment should be available when someone is ready for it, regardless of income or geography, and our policies should recognize substance-use disorder as a public-health issue while still holding people who traffic dangerous drugs accountable. Success should mean both fewer overdose deaths overall and closing the unacceptable disparities between Minnesota communities.”

KEYWORDS: Treatment, Harm Reduction, Equity

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“Seeing overdose deaths decline tells me that the work we are doing is making a difference, but we cannot ignore the communities that are still being hit the hardest. The fact that Indigenous and Black Minnesotans continue to experience overdose deaths at much higher rates means we need to do more. I believe in expanding access to treatment, mental health services, medication-assisted treatment (MAT), and recovery support that is available when people are ready to ask for help. We also need to listen to communities and invest in programs that understand the unique challenges people face, including trauma, housing struggles, and financial stress. Addiction impacts families across Minnesota, and we need to respond with compassion, not judgment. Our goal should be simple: save lives and make sure every Minnesotan has a real chance at recovery.”

KEYWORDS: access, community, equity, treatment, invest in healthy communities

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“We need to move from voluntary treatment rehabilitation, to involuntary treatment after 3 months to decline drug impact on human life, and to improve quality of life and longterm, for all communities affected.”

KEYWORDS: Treatment, rehabilitate, longterm.

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“I support education and community intervention pathways to reduce overdose deaths, including programs that allow advocates to work with police departments to enhance public health and safety.”

KEYWORDS: Education, Intervention, Overdose, Health, Safety, Partnerships

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“Minnesota still has a major issue with Fentanyl even after the Covid-lockdown peaks. Stopping overdoses starts with border security and foreign policy. I would advocate for the full designation of drug cartels as terrorist organizations and involve U.S. Military intervention against them. I would advocate to place penalties on Latin American countries who we see the drug trade coming from. I stand firm by the Monroe Doctrine and would enforce the naval supremacy of the United States in the Western Hemisphere to deter Fentanyl shipments from China to Latin America. Strict border protections would then act as a secondary barrier against these drugs entering the country.

At home we need a complete overhaul of our justice system. For criminals of victimless crimes I see no problem in restorative justice, but for those who placed others in harms way we need to bring back punitive justice. The only way to keep minority neighborhoods safe from crime is to keep the criminals off the street and in prison. That doesn’t mean over-policing that punishes people for minor infractions, but it does mean that when the real bad guys do get caught they don’t come back to the neighborhood anytime soon.”

KEYWORDS: N/A

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“I don’t support paying people to stay home and not work, which is what caused the highest spike in overdose deaths when the government closed down our state and sent thousands of dollars to people and told them not to work. I do not support racist policies and oppose legislation that distributes money based on race. The Constitution’s 14th Amendment prohibits programs and funding based on race. While science may look at race, government policies must incorporate other factors, such as income, two-parent vs single-parent households, or other factors that do not violate our laws.”

KEYWORDS: Never Again

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“As Chair of Human Services, I support continuing the progress in reducing overdose deaths by expanding prevention, treatment, and harm reduction. That means broad access to naloxone, fentanyl test strips, culturally specific outreach, medication-assisted treatment, recovery housing, mental health care, and stronger community-based services.

Because Indigenous and Black Minnesotans continue to face disproportionate overdose deaths, resources must be targeted to the communities most impacted, with Tribal and community leadership guiding the response.”

KEYWORDS: Harm Reduction, Equity, Treatment

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“As a probation officer, I see firsthand how our in action harms the most vulnerable. We need to invest in chemical dependency treatment, sober housing, alternatives to Policing, mental health initiatives, and housing programs that will allow people the time to work on their sobriety. This is very hard to do if you’re homeless. We need to look at the programs being realized and ensuring quality assurance, accountability and oversight. This is a public health crisis not just a public safety one.”

KEYWORDS: Public health crisis

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“more bible, more accountability, more personal responsibility ”

KEYWORDS: personal responsibility important!

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“The segregation of our society has left large voids in our humanity. Policies that can help are more counselors available in underserved communities. Redistributing healthcare from centralization to individual communities. This is a long term fix and will be very difficult to achieve with “for profit” healthcare. Finally, education at all levels to be inclusive of others.”

KEYWORDS: Counseling, redistribution, inclusive

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“We should follow the European model which has proven to work so well in Portugal and other places by decriminalizing addiction and treating it as the mental and physical health emergency it is, instead of a criminal matter. Furthermore, we can reduce addiction by improving the general support for the poor and unhoused. Addiction is most frequent amongst those segments of the population, and improving the general welfare will have its own amelioration effect on addiction.”

KEYWORDS: Treatment, Decriminalize, Support

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“I would like to know what caused these drug overdoses. Is it because of the doctors prescribed the wrong drugs or prescribed too much consumptions? Are these drugs too addictive? If so, are there policies to limit consumption? But I would personally want to push for natural health and healing and get people off the dependency on drugs.”

KEYWORDS: Natural Health & Healing

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“I have to respectfully disagree with the numbers presented because I see the impact of this crisis firsthand in my community near George Floyd Square. I have also experienced being unhoused, and I understand how important it is to create programs that truly help people. I believe we need a compassionate but practical approach. We must provide people with a real choice to get help, including treatment, support services, and a safe place to recover away from the environment that contributed to their struggles. Sometimes people need a new beginning in a different environment to have a real opportunity to change. I also believe we must meet people where they are. Not everyone is ready for help at the same time, but when they are ready, we must have a bed, resources, and a support system available to help them rebuild their lives.”

KEYWORDS: PEOPLE FIRST

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“This is a continuing issue. BIPOC community members continue to benefit at lower levels from nearly every effort to improve any issue. We must work together to create policy that takes this into account and intentionally work together to understand why this is, and how we offset this imbalance. We must be accountable to inclusivity in policy.”

KEYWORDS: Fairness, Access, Accountability

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“The decline is real and it happened because people did the work: naloxone in more hands, fentanyl test strips, syringe services, and treatment that meets people where they already are. I would fund all of it at a level that keeps the trend moving.

The disparities tell us where the resources have not reached. Indigenous Minnesotans in my district are dying at rates that would be treated as an emergency anywhere else. I support direct funding to tribal nations and Native-led organizations, on a government to government basis, rather than routing dollars through county intermediaries and hoping they arrive. The programs that work are built by the communities carrying the loss.

The other constraint is workforce. In rural northern Minnesota the availability of substance use and mental health providers is falling faster than the need is, and a person ready for help can wait weeks for an opening. I support higher and indexed reimbursement rates, loan repayment tied to rural and tribal service, training pipelines through tribal and community colleges, and cutting the regulatory paperwork that pulls counselors away from clients without improving oversight.

Treatment on demand, close to home, is how the number keeps falling.”

KEYWORDS: Harm reduction, Tribal-directed funding, Treatment workforce

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“Actually bring in experts who know how to reduce the issue for blacks and natives. Help uplift their communities economically and try our best to fix communities instead of trying to create a criminal class.”

KEYWORDS: The #1 important thing to me. A healthy MN is a wealthy MN.

Q6 Fatal drug overdoses in Minnesota have significantly declined in recent years, representing a 28% drop from a record peak of 1,392 overdose deaths in 2022. However, compared to White Minnesotans, Indigenous Minnesotans are 7 to 15 times more likely to experience a fatal drug overdose, while Black Minnesotans are 2 to 3 times more likely to die from a drug-related overdose. What policies, if any, do you support to continue the downward trend of overdose deaths for Minnesotans?

“First of all, I worked at a nonprofit and no they’re not. The MN government just crashed the systems so they would not have to count the people who made it look like they were running the government terribly and Tim Walz would look like a good VP pick. Actually, no one in charge cares about them and when the bodies are found, no one investigates it at all. Native Americans just kept on keeping track of each other and they care when their people just start disappearing. Narcan is great, though. I also support the DEA, but this survey is full of misinformation in the questions. Legit journalists wouldn’t cite a hacked system unless it was to report on what was happening with the hack.”

KEYWORDS: Healthcare kills people for profit and there is no public health, only public illness and a few, “crazy” people who are healthy because they believe in cures instead of pain management, which goes against MN scientists.

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“Continue funding at (at least) 2024 levels.”

KEYWORDS: preserve historical funding

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“State policy must actively protect and multiply scientific research investments to keep Minnesota competitive. I support expanding state matching grants through the Minnesota Partnership for Biotechnology and Medical Genomics, modernizing state R&D tax credits for startups, and streamlining commercialization pathways for university research. By aligning state incentives with federal NIH capital, we keep high-paying tech and medical jobs in Minnesota, strengthen our world-class healthcare economy, and turn raw research into market-ready solutions.”

KEYWORDS: Commercialization, Investment, Competitiveness

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I support strong and dependable funding for scientific and medical research. Investments through the NIH and other public research programs support Minnesota universities, hospitals, businesses, thousands of jobs, and discoveries that improve and save lives.

This issue is also personal to me. My family saw how research and access to a trial medicine gave my brother additional years of life while he fought cancer. Families across Minnesota are depending on researchers to develop the next treatment or cure.

I would support state partnerships with Minnesota universities, research institutions, hospitals, and responsible private-sector innovators. I would also advocate for continued federal research funding and oppose politically motivated cuts or interference that weaken legitimate scientific work. State investments should encourage medical research, clean-energy technology, agricultural innovation, environmental science, and opportunities for students and early-career scientists.

Research funding is not simply an expense. It is an investment in lives, skilled jobs, new businesses, and Minnesota’s long-term competitiveness.”

KEYWORDS: Medical Research, Innovation, Investment

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“Minnesota benefits enormously from investments in scientific research. I support continued public investment in research at both the state and federal levels because many important discoveries and innovations would not happen without it.

At the same time, government should not be expected to bear 100% of the cost. I would like to see greater investment from private companies and industries that benefit from research and innovation. Public-private partnerships can expand research capacity and create jobs while leveraging taxpayer dollars.

However, private investment must never come at the expense of scientific independence. Research funding should include strong transparency and conflict-of-interest protections so that sponsors cannot influence research findings, suppress unfavorable results, or undermine public trust. We need to protect researchers’ ability to follow the evidence wherever it leads.

My goal is a balanced approach: maintain strong public investment in basic and applied research, encourage responsible private-sector investment, and ensure that the science—not the source of the funding—determines the conclusions.”

KEYWORDS: public-private partnership

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“Federal funding through the NIH is a vital economic and scientific engine for Minnesota, but we cannot rely on Washington alone to secure our state’s innovation economy. I plan to support robust state-level policies that amplify these federal investments and protect our local research workforce.

First, I will advocate for expanding state-backed matching funds—similar to the state’s bioinnovation and environmental trust funds—to help Minnesota universities and independent researchers bridge federal grant cycles. This ensures critical health and safety research never grinds to a halt due to federal gridlock. Second, I support aggressively investing in state higher education infrastructure to maintain world-class clinical, training, and laboratory spaces, keeping Minnesota competitive for top-tier scientific talent.

Finally, I will fight to protect these research jobs from corporate exploitation, ensuring state funding prioritizes public-health and community-driven advancements rather than special-interest profits. By building a solid state-level foundation, we can shield our public universities, secure thousands of working-class tech and research jobs, and ensure Minnesota remains a global leader in scientific discovery that benefits everyday people.”

KEYWORDS: Public Health Prioritization

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“As Chair of the Minnesota Senate Higher Education Committee, I oversee state funding appropriations for universities and public research systems in Minnesota. I have been a vocal proponent of public research funding, particularly in the wake of federal grant disruptions and cuts affecting the University of Minnesota.

My office spearheaded Senate omnibus legislation to allocate billions to Minnesota’s higher education and research sectors, specifically defending state special funds designated for the University of Minnesota’s academic research and biological collections, public health research, environmental science, conservation efforts, and initiatives like the Minnesota Geological Survey, which rely on state legislative appropriations to study water, minerals, and land use.

I oppose federal grant cuts (such as NIH grant rollbacks) and federal rule changes that threaten merit-based science. We must reversing these cuts to protect and fully fund local medical studies, jobs, and scientific discovery.”

KEYWORDS: legislative appropriations / public health / fully fund

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I feel like debate teams should be set up to justify if the grant was justified and have it televised for public learning and knowledge. I would also like to see where the grants have gone. Take a pause on the funding.”

KEYWORDS: Three ways of showing evidence of value to society.

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“Scientific research is one of Minnesota’s greatest competitive advantages. Our universities, healthcare systems, and private research institutions create discoveries that improve lives while supporting thousands of high-quality jobs. I support continued investment in scientific research at both the state and federal levels, particularly in medicine, agriculture, manufacturing, clean energy, and artificial intelligence. Research funding should encourage collaboration between universities, government, and private industry to move discoveries from the laboratory into Minnesota businesses and communities. Taxpayer investments should be transparent, accountable, and focused on delivering measurable public benefits while preserving scientific independence. Investing in research today strengthens Minnesota’s economy, workforce, and quality of life for generations to come.”

KEYWORDS: Research, Innovation, Economic Growth

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I will fully support science and research. First, I need a miracle to get elected.”

KEYWORDS: science communication

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“As a Regent on the Board of the University of Minnesota I am deeply passionate about funding our universities and science. I support making college more affordable as well, but want to see the cuts to science at the federal level restored!”

KEYWORDS: Fund science, support higher education

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“Research pays. As a farmer I benefit every season from work done at land grant universities. Disease resistant crops, soil science, pollinator research that keeps beekeepers like me in business. The NIH numbers in your question tell the same story in medicine. This is one of the few places government spends a dollar and gets more than a dollar back. Here is my problem. Congress cannot fund research reliably because Congress cannot budget at all. Continuing resolutions, shutdown threats, and last minute deals whiplash every lab in the country. Scientists spend their time writing grant applications instead of doing science because nobody knows what next year looks like. My policies. Stable multi-year funding for core research agencies so labs can plan. Grants awarded on merit and open competition, not on which university hired the better lobbyist. Full public transparency on where every research dollar goes, because taxpayer confidence is what keeps the money flowing. And my CAPT Act suspends congressional pay when Congress fails to pass a real budget, because the biggest threat to American research is not any one cut. It is a Congress that will not do its job.”

KEYWORDS: merit-based grants, CAPT Act, congressional accountability

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I support funding that is transparent, efficient, and tied to clear outcomes. When research drives medical advances, supports jobs, and grows our economy, it is a smart investment.

I would back policies that encourage federal agencies like the National Institute on Health to continue partnering with Minnesota universities, while ensuring that grants are awarded through a fair, merit‑based process. At the state level, I support efforts that promote public‑private research partnerships, reduce unnecessary red tape, and help Minnesota compete for national research funding.

Strong science research supports health care, agriculture, technology, and emergency response. Continued investment should be guided by accountability, measurable results, and a focus on projects that deliver benefits for Minnesotans.”

KEYWORDS: Transparent funding, Merit based research, Public private partnerships

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“As a state representative, I would not have a vote on federal NIH appropriations, but I would be a strong advocate against federal cuts that threaten Minnesota researchers, universities, hospitals, and patients. At the state level, I would support strong funding for the University of Minnesota and other public research institutions, investments in research facilities and laboratories, partnerships that help bring federal research dollars to Minnesota, and STEM education that develops the next generation of scientists and researchers. Minnesota should also continue supporting scientific expertise within state agencies. Whether we are responding to emerging diseases, PFAS contamination, invasive species, agricultural challenges, or new technologies, weakening our scientific capacity hurts us all.”

KEYWORDS: Research, Innovation, Investment

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“Scientific research strengthens Minnesota’s economy, improves public health, and creates high-quality jobs. As a state senator, I would support sustained state investment in the University of Minnesota, Minnesota State institutions, public-private research partnerships, and competitive grant programs that help researchers secure and leverage federal funding. I would also work with Minnesota’s congressional delegation to advocate for stable NIH and other federal research appropriations. Minnesota should prioritize research that addresses major public needs, including disease prevention and treatment, mental health, environmental contamination, clean water, agricultural resilience, medical technology, and emerging technologies. I would support investments in laboratories, research infrastructure, and education programs that prepare students for careers in science, engineering, healthcare, and advanced manufacturing. Funding decisions should be transparent, competitive, and guided by scientific merit and measurable public benefit. As a University of Minnesota Ph.D. graduate and former higher education department chair, I understand that research funding is both an investment in discovery and an important economic-development strategy for Minnesota.”

KEYWORDS: Research, Innovation, Investment

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“The state cannot replace the full scale of federal research funding, but it should consider temporary bridge funding when unexpected federal disruptions threaten promising research, skilled jobs, or Minnesota’s ability to compete for future grants. Minnesota should also challenge unlawful or politically motivated efforts to cancel grants that have already been awarded. At the state level, I support stable funding for the Minnesota’s research universities and targeted investments in research that addresses Minnesota’s needs, including medical research, agriculture, water quality, and public health.”

KEYWORDS: bridge funding, stable funding

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

Sen. Klobuchar provided this letter to the Minnesota Stance on Science team.

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I strongly support continued public investment in scientific research. Research funding is not simply an expense..it is an investment that creates jobs, drives innovation, improves health outcomes, strengthens our economy, and helps Minnesota remain competitive.

At the state level, I would support funding and partnerships with Minnesota universities, colleges, healthcare systems, agricultural researchers, and other research institutions. I would also advocate for rural Minnesota to share in those investments and benefits. Research into agriculture, water quality, renewable energy, emerging technologies, healthcare access, and rural health can directly improve the lives and economies of communities like those in Senate District 9.

Minnesota legislators do not determine federal NIH funding, but we can advocate strongly for continued federal investment and work to ensure Minnesota remains positioned to compete for those dollars.

Science also requires independence and integrity. Public research funding should support rigorous, transparent, evidence-based work without political interference in scientific conclusions.

When research funding brings billions of dollars into our economy while advancing medicine, agriculture, technology, and environmental protection, supporting science is both good public policy and smart economic policy.”

KEYWORDS: Investment. Innovation. Independence.

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I would ensure current state funding is kept intact and add to it where we need additional research for any subject. We can’t make decisions if we don’t have the information. I do not have anything more specific at this time, but I am always in favor of more information where feasible.”

KEYWORDS: Knowledge, Decisions, Important

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“Protecting the taxpayers’ money is the first obligation of a Governor. We can support research that will benefit a broad constituency but must carefully examine that suppor prior to any awards and then closely monitor progress.”

KEYWORDS: essential, scrutinized

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I support sustained public investment in scientific research because it drives innovation, strengthens our economy, improves public health and creates high quality jobs. I would support stable, merit-based funding for research institutions, universities and National laboratories while ensuring transparency, accountability and reasonable stewardship of taxpayer dollars. I also encourage partnerships between government, academia and private industry to accelerate the development of new technologies and medical breakthroughs. Investments and research should be guided by scientific merit, National priorities and the potential to deliver meaningful public benefits.”

KEYWORDS: Research Fuels Prosperity

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I plan support all policies that focus on the advancement of our society on a fundamental level above all. We need to ensure proper access to food, water, and shelter, and we should be open to our advancements to get us there. This includes sound legislation that ensures quality over profit and pace. Like all structures built, we need to ensure all legislation and the choices made by a vote, come from a sound foundation that was researched and inspected prior to ensure it can handle the weight it can bear on the community. Being open to innovation and technology that can get us there but first we have to invest in it.”

KEYWORDS: Research, Invest, and Apply

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“Scientific research is both a public good and an important part of Minnesota’s economy. Our universities, health systems, researchers, and biotechnology companies generate discoveries, train skilled workers, attract investment, and improve people’s lives. I support strong and predictable federal funding for institutions such as NIH and NSF, and at the state level I would support investments that leverage federal research dollars, strengthen research partnerships, support emerging technologies, and help Minnesota turn discoveries into businesses and jobs. We should also continue investing in public universities and in STEM education so Minnesota has the workforce necessary to remain competitive. Cutting research funding may save money on a spreadsheet today while costing us medical breakthroughs, economic growth, and skilled jobs tomorrow.”

KEYWORDS: Research, Innovation, Investment

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“Scientific research is one of the reasons Minnesota remains a leader in innovation, healthcare, and economic growth. I support strong investments in science and research at both the state and federal levels because breakthroughs in medicine, agriculture, technology, and environmental protection improve lives and create good-paying jobs. As a legislator, I would advocate for stable funding for universities, research institutions, and programs that bring new discoveries from the lab into our communities. I also believe we must protect the independence of scientists and ensure research decisions are based on evidence, not politics.”

KEYWORDS: invest, research, innovation, advancement, solutions

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“We will continue to support Science Funding with research grants and contracts to Minnesota University’s, to improve research regarding Science for State and Federal levels.”

KEYWORDS: Science Funding is necessary.

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I will support whatever measures come up to continue funding scientific research in our state. The economic activity that it contributes is important and so is the impact that research has on our lives and those of our children.”

KEYWORDS: Preserve, Support, Research, Funding, Benefits, Economic

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“We need a wide sweeping federal audit of all research and development grants and contracts to make sure progress is delivered from that funding. Employing people to do work that isn’t valuable is not something the Federal Government can afford to fund when we are 40 trillion dollars in debt. Not saying the work they do isn’t valuable but I would need to assess that for myself and for the regular constituents of this state.”

KEYWORDS: N/A

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I support research grants which benefit the public and which are not or will not be financed privately. I have witnessed 30-40% administrative fees on some grants, and believe we need to restrict what can be used for admin purposes so most of the research dollars go to the researchers and not to a bloated bureaucracy.”

KEYWORDS: Research over bureaucracy

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I strongly support continued science research funding at both the state and federal levels. Research investments save lives, create jobs, grow our economy, and keep us competitive. I support protecting NIH and NSF funding, expanding state matching grants, supporting early career scientists, and strengthening partnerships with universities, health systems, and innovators.”

KEYWORDS: Research, Jobs, Funding

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“Research in science is how we move communities. We must allow our skilled scientists to be able to research their areas of interest and discuss legislation to policy makers in orderto make informed decisions.”

KEYWORDS: Skilled workers

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I want more info. I’m not a fan of the government funding anything that’s not considered essential.”

KEYWORDS: need more info.

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I will support funding for Minnesota to continue to weaning away from fossil fuels. Biomass from farms can help the farmers make money, rural communities to thrive and lessen the loading of greenhouse gasses. The healthcare industry needs continued funding to continue to develop better treatments for all. I do believe that mRNA research is of great value for our well being. Soil management without fossil fuel fertilizers.”

KEYWORDS: Energy, Health, Agriculture

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“As a member of the state legislature, it would be necessary to make sure that our state and educational systems are properly set up to be in compliance with funding guidelines and reporting, and to make sure funds are spent appropriately. We should be careful to fund research at institutions of learning and make sure we’re not funding private profit.”

KEYWORDS: Compliance, Auditing, Public

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I think that’s a good thing. As long as the schools can clarify what they want to do with the fund, what research and results they want to achieve from using that fund.”

KEYWORDS: Very Clear Goals

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“NIH funding is an important investment in Minnesota’s healthcare, research, and economy. These grants support scientists, healthcare workers, students, and research jobs, but we also need transparency about how these dollars impact our communities. I support continued investment in research while ensuring accountability, tracking the jobs supported, and making sure taxpayer-funded research benefits Minnesota families.”

KEYWORDS: protect Jobs

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“U of M continues to be a leader in innovation regarding environmental stewardship, and I support funding additional programs that improve our ability to generate jobs, economic activity, and knowledge. Education and research is the key to every approach in legislation. The two are mutually beneficial.”

KEYWORDS: Growth, innovation, education

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“Research funding is rural economic development, and people in my district do not always see it that way because the labs are in the Twin Cities and Duluth. The Extension trial that saves a farmer a spray pass, the wild rice and fisheries work, the rural health studies that tell us why our clinics keep closing. That work is done by grant-funded scientists.

Federal support has become unreliable. Grants have been frozen and terminated midstream, which leaves graduate students without stipends and multi-year studies abandoned partway through. I support a state bridge fund that lets the University of Minnesota and Minnesota State carry interrupted projects through a disruption instead of losing the people and the data.

I also support stable base funding for higher education so research is not paid for by tuition increases, protecting Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund and Clean Water Legacy dollars for applied research, and building research capacity at tribal colleges and regional campuses so studies about our communities are conducted with our communities.

Minnesota built a research economy over decades. Maintaining it means paying for it consistently, and the return shows up in jobs, in farm income, and clean water for generations.”

KEYWORDS: Bridge funding, Research capacity, Rural return on investment

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I would continue the current plan, but emphasize more on health, food, and finding cures to chronic illness. All research is useless if there is no healthy people to do the research.”

KEYWORDS: important, but must focus on Health, Food, and Chronic illness. The people’s well being matters more than profit.

Q5 In 2025 alone, the National Institute on Health (NIH) awarded over $700 million for research grants and contracts to Minnesota universities, which directly supported over 7,000 jobs and $1.79 billion of economic activity in Minnesota. What policies, if any, do you plan to implement or support regarding funding for continued science research either at the state or federal level?

“I would support a fully government-run healthcare system that is a lot more competitive than the current industry because that would shift the incentives and push scientists to do real science again. The U of M just put out recently that they developed the first artificial cell. No they didn’t and I don’t want to pay for entitled kids to be deluded into thinking they did something significant only to be preachy and wrong while the government mandates that we listen to them. That was done at UNC last month and has been an ongoing project since last century. Science has started to feel like every 4 year old who built a robotic car with a pre-made kit gets a news segments for their genius invention and no, taxpayers shouldn’t be paying for any part of that ego-chasing, ignorant delusion.”

KEYWORDS: Universal healthcare cured cancer in Europe.

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I have an extremely high level of trust in traditional science. As a career attorney I know that the facts, not the biases, lead to the result.”

KEYWORDS: Complete inescapable reliable

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“As an Independent State Senator, I will use non-partisan scientific evidence—not political party line or corporate talking points—to guide policy decisions. I will consult state researchers, academic institutions, and technical experts at agencies like the MPCA and MDH to evaluate environmental risk, public health data, and economic impacts before casting votes on complex legislation.”

KEYWORDS: Evidence-based, Independent, Non-partisan

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“As an electrical engineer and project manager, I rely on facts, testing, and expert knowledge when making decisions. I would bring that same approach to the Minnesota Senate.

I would consult scientists when considering policies involving public health, clean water, energy, agriculture, education, emerging technology, infrastructure, and environmental protection. This would include reviewing peer-reviewed research, requesting testimony from qualified experts, consulting Minnesota universities and state scientific agencies, and listening to scientists who live and work in affected communities.

Scientists should help lawmakers understand the evidence, risks, costs, and likely outcomes of a proposal. Policymakers must also consider community experiences, economic effects, and ethical concerns. Science should not be ignored or manipulated for political convenience. I will support transparent, evidence-based policymaking that explains the facts and uncertainties to the public.”

KEYWORDS: Evidence, Expertise, Transparency

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I believe good policy starts with good information. As a legislator, I would seek out scientists and other subject-matter experts when legislation involves issues where their expertise can help us understand the evidence, risks, and likely outcomes.

I would look to scientists to help distinguish established evidence from assumptions or political talking points, and I would consider the quality and breadth of the available research when making decisions. I would also value input from multiple experts and perspectives rather than relying on a single source.

My background as an educator, researcher, and program evaluator has taught me to ask questions, examine evidence, understand limitations, and be willing to change course when new information becomes available.

Scientists provide expertise; elected officials have a responsibility to weigh that evidence alongside the experiences and needs of the people they represent. I would bring those pieces together to make thoughtful, evidence-informed decisions—not decisions based on ideology or who is making the loudest argument.”

KEYWORDS: Evidence research risks/outcomes

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“When evaluating policy, referring to scientists and empirical data is not just important—it is an absolute necessity for objective, human-centric governance.

I will consistently look to scientific experts to understand the objective reality of complex issues, free from corporate spin. This is especially vital when navigating major public health initiatives, mapping out localized environmental protections to defend our air and water, and managing emerging technologies like AI data centers to ensure they do not devastate our power grids or ground water resources.

However, looking to science means seeking objective data on what is happening, not letting unelected bodies dictate how we govern. Scientists provide the crucial facts and risk assessments, but as an elected official, my job is to take that evidence and balance it with a fierce dedication to civil liberties, worker protections, and constitutional rights. I will use science as a guiding light to cut through special-interest lobbying, ensuring our state’s policies are grounded in hard truth while firmly protecting the autonomy and well-being of everyday working Minnesotans.”

KEYWORDS: Empirical Fact-Finding

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“On issues such as climate justice, resisting corporate polluters, and ways the State can better honor and uphold Treaties, I will always follow the leadership of our environmental advocates, research scientists, Indigenous elders and Tribal leadership. On the pressing issues of our time such as pipelines, data centers, copper nickel sulfide mining, a just transition, and energy, I will listen to researchers, scientists, and community leaders in confronting the climate crisis that threatens all of, and follow the leadership of Indigenous community leaders that are fighting climate disaster and environmental racism.”

KEYWORDS: climate crisis / climate justice / environmental advocates

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I would like to hear from more than one scientist or school even the knowledge of other countries. I would also like to consult other colleagues in the profession and workforce.”

KEYWORDS: I like real data and facts more than just written words.

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“Science should be a cornerstone of good government, but it should never be the only voice at the table. As Governor, I will rely on scientists, engineers, physicians, economists, agricultural experts, and researchers when evaluating policies involving public health, infrastructure, natural resources, energy, education, and emerging technologies. I believe decisions should be guided by credible evidence, peer-reviewed research, and transparent data while also considering economic impacts, constitutional rights, and the everyday experiences of Minnesotans. Science helps us understand what is possible and what the likely consequences of our choices will be. It is the responsibility of elected leaders to balance that knowledge with the values and priorities of the people they serve.”

KEYWORDS: Evidence-Based, Transparency, Collaboration

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I trust science.”

KEYWORDS: verification

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I will rely on scientists to help inform my views on a lot of policies, including on climate change, education and any areas where the views of scientists would be most beneficial.”

KEYWORDS: Truth, peer-review, testing hypothesis

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I am a farmer and beekeeper. Science is not abstract to me. I use it to test soil, water, and hive health. I use it everyday because my livelihood depends on getting the facts right. If a vote touches science, I want to hear from scientists before I vote. I would seek input directly from researchers, including the University of Minnesota Extension and scientists who live and work in the Eighth District, not just whoever a lobbyist sends to my office. I would never vote on something without hearing multiple positions on it. Good science includes disagreements. I want to hear the strongest case on each side, ask hard questions, and then make the call myself. That is what I would owe the people I represent. I don’t take PAC money, and would not take lobbyist money. That matters here. When a member of Congress hears from a scientist, the question is whether they are listening to evidence or a donor. I answer to my district, so the evidence can actually reach me.”

KEYWORDS: Evidence-based decisions, multiple perspectives, accountability

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I would rely on scientists whenever a policy touches public health, natural resources, environmental protection, or any issue where solid data and research are essential for responsible decision making. When evaluating a bill, I would consult subject matter experts to review the evidence, understand potential impacts, and ensure that my vote is grounded in sound science rather than politics or special interests. My priority is to support policies that protect Minnesotans and reflect the best available research.”

KEYWORDS: Evidence‑based decision making, public health and environmental expertise, Subject matter consultation

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“Science should be central to understanding the facts behind a policy decision. As a legislator, I would rely on scientists and subject-matter experts when evaluating policies involving public health, the environment, emerging technology, agriculture, energy, education, and other areas where decisions should be informed by evidence. That means hearing directly from researchers, state agency scientists, medical professionals, engineers, universities, and experts with relevant experience; reviewing peer-reviewed research and reliable data; and asking whether there is a genuine scientific consensus or meaningful disagreement that policymakers need to understand.”

KEYWORDS: Evidence, Expertise, Integrity

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I would consult scientists throughout the legislative process, especially when evaluating policies involving public health, environmental protection, emerging technology, infrastructure, agriculture, and economic development. I would look to peer-reviewed research, testimony from subject-matter experts, Minnesota’s public universities, state agency scientists, and professionals working directly in affected fields. I would also ask experts to explain the strength of the evidence, areas of uncertainty, potential unintended consequences, and how proposed policies could be measured over time. My Ph.D. in design and sustainability, experience in global manufacturing, and service in higher education taught me to value rigorous research while also asking practical questions about implementation. Science should not be treated as partisan. It should help lawmakers understand risks, compare options, and make decisions that improve people’s lives. I would combine scientific evidence with community input, fiscal analysis, and ethical considerations, while remaining willing to update my position when stronger evidence becomes available.”

KEYWORDS: Evidence, Expertise, Accountability

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I would refer to scientists when policy decisions require evaluating evidence and risk to assess potential impacts on human health and the environment.”

KEYWORDS: evidence-based, independent, peer-reviewed, transparent

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

Sen. Klobuchar provided this letter to the Minnesota Stance on Science team.

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I believe good policy should be grounded in evidence, not ideology. When legislation involves public health, agriculture, water quality, climate, energy, technology, or other scientific matters, I would seek input from qualified experts and consider peer-reviewed research, established scientific consensus, and transparent data. I would also listen to the people and communities directly affected. Elected officials cannot be experts in every field, but we have a responsibility to consult those who are, ask thoughtful questions, and make informed decisions based on the best available evidence.”

KEYWORDS: Evidence. Expertise. Accountability.

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“Anything around health or the environment is a must. Scientists give us the facts that can be used to make legislation. Social science would also be one that I would lean heavily on for knowledge. In the end, I can look up the papers and reports, but oftentimes an expert will understand the meaning behind the numbers better than I can.”

KEYWORDS: Experts, Knowledge, Facts

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“Boni fide scientific research is essentail to progress. Trusted advisors.”

KEYWORDS: trust, advisors, progress

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I would rely on scientists and other subject mattered experts whenever legislation involves technical or scientific issues. This includes public health, environmental policy, energy, agriculture, infrastructure, emerging technologies, cyber security and National security. I would review the best available scientific evidence, consider differing expert viewpoints when appropriate and evaluate the likely benefits, risk and unintended consequences of a proposal. Scientific expertise should inform policy decisions, while elected officials remain responsible for balancing scientific evidence with constitutional principles, economic impacts, ethical considerations and the needs and values of the people they represent.”

KEYWORDS: Science Informed Policymaking

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“With my experience in structural design, I understand the importance of referring to those with the proper education and experience in their fields of profession. With my experience, I will create the conversations to seek the knowledge of individuals in their fields that relate to the legislation.”

KEYWORDS: Experience, Predication, Reason

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“Science should inform policymaking whenever a decision depends on questions of public health, environmental impact, technology, infrastructure, or other areas where specialized expertise matters. I would seek input from scientists, researchers, technical experts, state agencies, and affected communities, while also looking carefully at the quality of the evidence and areas where experts may disagree. Policymakers still have to weigh costs, benefits, values, and real-world impacts, but those decisions should begin with reliable evidence rather than ideology. As an attorney who works extensively with technology, privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence, I am accustomed to asking experts what the evidence actually tells us before deciding what we should do with it.”

KEYWORDS: Evidence-based, Expertise, Accountability

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“If elected, I would rely on scientists as a key part of making informed, responsible decisions for the people of Minnesota. Whether it’s public health, environmental protection, infrastructure, or energy policy, I believe decisions should be guided by evidence, not politics. I would consult experts to understand the data, risks, and long-term impacts of policies before casting a vote. That also means listening to a diverse range of scientists, including those studying climate change, water quality, agriculture, and mental health. My role isn’t to replace their expertise, it’s to respect it and use it to shape policies that actually work for our communities. Minnesotans deserve leadership that values facts, transparency, and solutions grounded in real-world evidence.”

KEYWORDS: Trust experts, Accountability through data, Follow the science, Facts over politics

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“Science helps to prove or dispute applications for quality of life for all living organisms, including humans.”

KEYWORDS: Science is necessary for theory into facts, and practice.

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I would refer to scientists on any vote that came up around issues of health, safety, environmental protections or whatever other subject enjoys a broad consensus from the scientific community.”

KEYWORDS: Health, Safety, Environment, Consensus

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I would rely upon input from different scientific bodies and individuals to ground my decisions in consensus. I understand the scientific method and engineering principles to a great degree, so I believe I can make solid decisions in policy and know when and who to ask about specific issues.”

KEYWORDS: N/A

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I follow a fairly scientific process when determining whether to vote for a bill, and there are two areas where scientists can help sway my vote:

1. Is it Constitutional?
2. Does it unnecessarily grow government?
3. Does the bill define a realistic path to achieving the results it seeks? (This is where my calls to scientists and constituents working in these industries comes in)
4. Is it enforceable?
5. Is there a private, non-governmental solution or market force which could deliver the same or similar results? (this is also where scientists and constituents working in these industries can help weigh in)
6. Does it end? (Does it sunset, or could this be a bad law that is difficult to remove? Can I force the legislature to evaluate its effectiveness before re-funding or re-authorizing?)”

KEYWORDS: Solutions Proven Results

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“As someone with a Computer Science degree, I believe policy should be guided by evidence. I consult subject matter experts to evaluate data, understand the impacts of proposed legislation, and make informed decisions that best serve the public.”

KEYWORDS: Evidence based policymaking, Data driven decisions, Technology

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“As a union president, I know that it is imperative that we reach out to subject matter experts, especially when it comes to matters of great importance. It would be a pleasure to work with all to get pertinent information in regards to Policy and issues.”

KEYWORDS: Pleasure to work with all

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“it all depends on what the issue is that we are voting on”

KEYWORDS: Trust, Science, Policy.

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“Health, environment, technology and energy production.”

KEYWORDS: Credence, evidence, critical

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“As a scientist, I am all too aware of the failure to consult experts on public policy. We should be consulting researchers in their area of expertise for any policy, including social scientists and economists to get the consensus of what the effects of our policies would be.”

KEYWORDS: Scientific Consensus Expertise

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“Always remember one thing, all scientific theories are falsifiable, that’s why the smartest scientists in the world once believed Earth was flat. We can trust Science to a degree, but always look at where their money is coming from and who funded for certain studies. Does the funder have a motive? Just like how an Italian Wine Maker funded a study saying that drinking wine reduces the chances for heart attacks. We should always strive to find the truth, and have discussions and even disagreements in search for the truth.
Science thrives when we have discussion, disagreements and challenging the status quo.”

KEYWORDS: Truth, Follow the Money, Discussions

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“Growing up on a farm taught me to respect the land, water, and the importance of facts. I believe scientists and experts should help guide policy decisions, especially when it comes to protecting our environment, public health, and communities. I will listen to experts, but I will also do my own research because I believe it is important to ask questions, verify information, and make sure decisions are based on the truth and the best interests of the people I serve.”

KEYWORDS: Science should be guided

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I believe experts that follow the scientific method and use proven data combined with experience to make informed recommendations pertaining to policy should always be included in the conversation. I don’t know what I don’t know, and should always gather as much information as possible before making any decisions as a legislator.”

KEYWORDS: Informed Scientific Collaboration

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“My professional foundation is library and information science, so my instinct is to go to the people who did the work and read the evidence before I make decisions.

I would bring scientists in at three points. Before a bill is drafted, so the policy is built from what the evidence supports rather than reverse engineered to fit a conclusion. During committee, where I would ask researchers directly what their findings can and cannot tell us and where the uncertainty sits. After passage, because a law nobody measures cannot be corrected.

I want more than one source at the table. University of Minnesota and Minnesota State researchers, Extension, staff scientists at the MPCA and DNR, and tribal natural resource and environmental departments, who hold both scientific expertise and sovereign authority over their own lands and waters. I also want independent monitoring funded by the state, so a community is never left reading only the numbers supplied by the party responsible for the problem.

Science tells us what is true and what is likely to happen. The vote is a question of obligation. I want both answered honestly, and I want the record open so constituents can check my work.”

KEYWORDS: Evidence-based, Independent verification, Transparency

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“When it involves environmental policies.”

KEYWORDS: No because there’s always new info and stufies being found and certain scientists are bought out by the Epstein class.

Q1 If elected, in what capacities would you refer to scientists when you are deciding how to vote on a policy?

“I’m very good at science. I admire certain scientists who have done more to progress the field than those who simply obtained a doctorate by writing an academic journal about something inconclusive that they needed to make seem significant, worsening the problem of distrust in science. I keep those real and good scientists in mind always and for everything, even if it’s just my starbucks order.”

KEYWORDS: Healthcare reform starts with reform and higher standards in academia.