Delaware

Q8 The Attorney General’s office is responsible for enforcing the Delaware Personal Data Privacy Act, which governs how resident’s personal data is collected and used. As the use of AI and large-scale data processing grows, what approach (if any) would you take to enforcing data privacy protections for Delaware residents?

Because Delaware is the preferred home of incorporation for dominant tech enterprises—including OpenAI—our Attorney General holds unmatched influence over corporate AI governance. When AG Kathy Jennings issued a Statement of No Objection allowing OpenAI to convert its primary business from a non-profit entity into a for-profit Public Benefit Corporation, it demonstrated how Delaware’s regulatory oversight shapes the global technology landscape.

However, corporate restructuring must be paired with aggressive civil rights enforcement on behalf of everyday Delawareans. Drawing on my track record fighting technological overreach as Legal Director of the ACLU of Delaware, I will treat AI accountability and data privacy under the Delaware Personal Data Privacy Act as vital civil liberties protections. My enforcement pillars will be: 1) Fighting Algorithmic Discrimination: Investigating automated systems and data brokers whose opaque algorithms produce discriminatory barriers in hiring, housing, healthcare access, and credit scoring. 2) Proactive Compliance Audits: Moving beyond voluntary guidance to actively audit entities harvesting sensitive health, location, biometric, or youth data without explicit, informed consent. 3) Protecting Digital Civil Liberties: Enforcing strict data minimization standards and safeguarding residents’ fundamental rights against unchecked data exploitation. (187 words)

Q8 The Attorney General’s office is responsible for enforcing the Delaware Personal Data Privacy Act, which governs how resident’s personal data is collected and used. As the use of AI and large-scale data processing grows, what approach (if any) would you take to enforcing data privacy protections for Delaware residents?

We are not only responsible for enforcing the DPDPA — we were one of its chief architects. We’ve been working for years to educate businesses, parents, and consumers or their rights and obligations under the law through direct outreach, paid media, and earned media. We have likewise worked with the legislature to continue to update the DPDPA to ensure it keeps up with evolving technology. That absolutely includes, but is not limited to, AI companies. Delawareans should consult privacy.delaware.gov to learn more about their rights and for information on how to submit a privacy complaint.

Q8 The Attorney General’s office is responsible for enforcing the Delaware Personal Data Privacy Act, which governs how resident’s personal data is collected and used. As the use of AI and large-scale data processing grows, what approach (if any) would you take to enforcing data privacy protections for Delaware residents?

I believe that privacy is directly related to safety and safety must be prioritized. While Artificial Intelligence can be a helpful tool, when used responsibly, we have to understand the objective reality that there are negative implications to consider. Everyone has the unalienable right to safety and privacy. Just as we have adopted HIPAA and abide by its strict statutes, we must understand and abide by the Delaware Personal Data Privacy Act to best protect Delawareans. If Delawareans’ safety and privacy are at risk, I intend to advocate for them.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Delaware families should not subsidize an AI buildout whose costs and risks are hidden. I would require large data-center loads to disclose projected demand, generation and transmission needs, water use, backup power, emissions, and who pays. FERC and PJM rules should require credible load forecasts, transparent interconnection studies, cost causation, and enforceable protections against shifting data-center-specific infrastructure costs onto households and small businesses.

Reliability comes first: new large loads should bring or contract for deliverable capacity, flexibility, storage, or other resources sufficient to avoid weakening the grid. Any federal subsidy should carry labor, efficiency, water, community-benefit, and public-reporting conditions, with periodic review if promised jobs or resource performance do not materialize.

AI can be foundational infrastructure for science, but importance is not entitlement. Reliable, affordable energy is a right; a data center is not. Communities must be able to set terms for the power, water, land, and public burden they are asked to carry, while preserving federal and state roles rather than pretending Washington directly sets Delaware retail rates or local siting decisions.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Data centers or surveillance centers, that is the question. I would investigate to what degree do we truly need data-center capacity. I am for relying upon (small) nuclear reactors and fossil fuel to power legitimate centers. In any event, will Ai serve mankind in the long run? I hope it will! I call for rigorous oversight of Ai.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

The first call to action is a moratorium on hyperscale data centers - though I prefer we ban them outright. If data centers do come to Delaware, we need to do two things to help blunt electricity cost increases. First is investing in battery technology. Texas was able to minimize energy cost increases by charging battery farms during off-peak hours - we should do the same. Next, we need to consider our role as a net electricity importer and start investing in electricity generation in Delaware, so we are less reliant on generation from our PJM partners.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Energy is one of the most critical issues facing our community. This is not just the work of this legislative session. It is generational work that will shape Delaware’s economy, environment, and quality of life for decades to come.

As a member of the House Natural Resources & Energy Committee, I believe the conversation around energy is moving too quickly without enough independent, peer reviewed research to fully inform the decisions before us. The first step should always be following the best available science and objective data. That evidence must be the foundation for every conversation about energy policy, whether we are discussing data centers, grid reliability, electricity costs, or future energy generation.

The rapid growth of AI driven data centers requires us to carefully weigh competing priorities. That balance can only be achieved by grounding our decisions in independent, peer reviewed research and thoughtful long-term planning. While data centers may strengthen our economy, they also pose real risks to our electric grid, our environment, and the long-term affordability of energy for Delaware families. These concerns are especially important in the coastal communities I represent in Sussex County, where increased energy demand and environmental impacts could have lasting consequences. No matter what policies are ultimately adopted, the impacts on our climate and environment must remain central to every decision.

I support requiring large energy users to pay their fair share of the infrastructure costs they create rather than shifting those costs onto Delaware ratepayers. I also support strengthening long term grid planning through PJM, investing in transmission infrastructure, expanding energy efficiency, and carefully evaluating the cumulative impacts of proposed data centers before projects are approved.

Delaware should welcome innovation, but not at the expense of affordability, grid reliability, or our natural resources. Evidence, transparency, and long-term planning must guide every decision we make because the choices we make today will affect generations of Delawareans to come.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Delaware should welcome innovation and economic development, but growth should not come at the expense of household electric bills or grid reliability. PJM projects significant electricity-demand growth over the next decade, with large data centers contributing to that increase. I support requiring major new energy users to pay the costs associated with connecting to and upgrading the grid rather than shifting those expenses onto residential ratepayers.

I would also support independent reliability and rate-impact reviews before very large loads are approved, stronger transparency in utility load forecasts, and financial commitments from developers when additional transmission or generation is required. Delaware should simultaneously invest in grid modernization, energy storage, distributed generation, and other technologies that can improve resilience and reduce long-term costs

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Delaware families are struggling with rising electricity costs, and they should not be asked to subsidize the enormous energy demands of the wealthiest corporations in the world. Data centers should not come to Delaware. If they do, we need to make sure they pay their fair share, bring new clean energy onto the grid, and don’t make electricity less affordable or reliable for everyone else.

I support creating a separate rate structure so large data centers bear the transmission and distribution costs they create rather than shifting them onto households and small businesses (HB 233). I also support requiring data centers to produce or procure enough clean energy to meet their demand (HB 445), and stronger oversight of utility infrastructure spending so families aren’t left paying for investments primarily serving large industrial customers (SB 326).

I would also require local approval and a transparent public process before large-scale data centers can be built, including review of impacts on energy costs, grid reliability, water use, and our environment. If we cannot guarantee that new data centers will not raise residents’ utility bills or harm surrounding communities, I support stopping new development until those protections are in place.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

I have limited knowlegdge of this specific area. However, I support exploring Nuclear energy as an option specifically Small Modular Reactors in place in Delaware to help with the growing needs and cost of energy. Additionally, I think we need to explore more use of Solar as an energy source as well. I have some concerns about the wind as an energy source and the environmental impact on the State. However, my thoughts should take a back to seat the thoughts of my consituents.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Rising electricity costs are a kitchen table issue, and Delaware families should not foot the bill for the surge in demand created by AI data centers. Across the PJM region, recent capacity auctions have driven record price increases that flow straight to residential ratepayers. I support the framework advanced in the General Assembly to establish a separate, higher rate class for very large energy users (over 50 megawatts) served through Delmarva Power, so data centers pay for the transmission and distribution capacity they require rather than shifting those costs onto households. I would strengthen Public Service Commission authority to review these agreements for ratepayer protection and reliability, require large users to reduce consumption during grid emergencies, and direct a share of their payments into low-income energy assistance and clean energy programs. At the same time, we must expand in-state renewable generation, battery storage, and energy efficiency so new demand is met with new supply. Evidence, not industry pressure, should guide how we grow the grid.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Delaware legislation shut down the coal plant at the Indian River inlet and never put a plan in place to replace what power was generated there. I believe there is great opportunity for SMRs at that location.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

I live a reality based life. The reality is that data centers are a necessary evil. China is already way ahead of us. Are we honestly okay with China having complete control of this? The issue is the energy needed. These centers MUST generate their own power. Our grids are NOT capable of supporting anything more than already have. Delawareans should not be paying a dime for any of this, and truthfully we CAN’T! The technology is available for the centers to be self sustainable, and any extra power produced could be sold back to Delmarva Power.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

PJM’s capacity market makes this concrete: prices have jumped roughly 11-fold in two years, clearing at the cap of $329.17/MW-day for 2026/27, with data centers driving nearly 40–45% of recent capacity costs region-wide. PJM has also missed its own reliability target two years running. Delaware households shouldn’t pay more for a grid that’s becoming less dependable.

I know this industry firsthand — my father spent 35 years as an electrical engineer with PECO, and I spent 15 years supporting data centers as an engineer with HP (Hewlett-Packard). Those were classic facilities that employed real people, not today’s hyperscale AI data centers, which draw enormous power and resources with a fraction of the local jobs.

I supported this year’s law requiring data centers to supply their own power, meet renewable requirements, and pay separate rates so costs aren’t shifted to ratepayers. I’ll push further: mandatory grid-impact and reliability review before large loads interconnect, and Delaware pressing PJM for reforms that protect both ratepayers and reliability.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

I stand together with a community that does not support the expansion of data centers in Delaware. The growing demand for electricity from large-scale AI and data-center facilities raises serious concerns about higher electricity costs, grid reliability, water use, and the long-term impact on our communities.

I would support policies that pause approval of new data centers until Delaware understands the full impact of electricity cost, the grid, water resources and surrounding communities. I also am skeptical of the utility of LLMs/AI, as evidence has shown no real productivity increases from their usage. The technology has too many drawbacks (such as its effects on our health and environment) and its economic benefit seems to be slim to none.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Delaware doesn’t control PJM, but PJM’s costs land on Delaware ratepayers. Capacity prices in our region jumped roughly 9.3 times last auction cycle, with data centers responsible for 63% of that increase. That’s why I’ve pushed to make large energy users cover their own costs, instead of passing them on to residents.

This session I supported HB 233, requiring Delmarva to create a separate rate class and blocking large facilities from connecting until they sign binding cost-protection agreements (they’re also first curtailed in emergencies unless they bring their own power). I also supported HB 445, requiring facilities to produce or procure 100% of their own energy within 10 years, partly renewable. And finally, I voted for SB 326, which caps Delmarva’s non-mandatory infrastructure spending and tightens rate oversight.

I’m not opposed to a moratorium in principle, but a pause only helps if the time is used to build real guardrails. Delaware has already done much of that work through these bills and the PSC’s large-load tariff docket. I’d favor a narrow, targeted pause over a blanket one duplicating existing efforts, paired with strict cost allocation, mandatory disclosure, non-by-right siting, and real community engagement requirements.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Data Centers must produce at least as much electricity as they use. Delaware must increase production of electricity. Need to expand natural gas and nuclear power. Must stop from going out of state to buy power. This is very costly to our rate payers. Also must do away with RGGI. It is now longer needed. Delaware was required to increase air quality by 10% through RGGI and now 45% cleaner.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Delaware must take a data-driven approach to managing the rapid growth of energy-intensive data centers within the PJM region. I support requiring large-load users, including AI-driven data centers, to bear the full cost of necessary grid upgrades through fair cost allocation, rather than shifting those costs onto residential ratepayers. We should also incentivize co-location of data centers with renewable energy generation and energy storage, reducing strain on the grid and improving reliability. Delaware should advocate within PJM for stronger interconnection standards and faster deployment of clean energy resources to meet rising demand. Transparency is critical, ratepayers deserve clear reporting on how large energy users impact costs and reliability. Evidence-based planning and regional coordination will ensure we protect consumers while supporting economic growth.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

The first priority should always be Delaware residents. Between the looming threat of data centers and a rate hike we need to press pause on AI driven growth. I would support policies that are well-informed and that includes talking to infrastructure designers, workers, and users. We need to think about how to diversify the grid in ways that support affordability, the expansion of green energy and new development without harming current residents.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Delaware is now one of the strictest states in the nation when it comes to regulating large-scale data centers, and that is exactly why we are positioned to grow responsibly. These protections safeguard our neighborhoods, ratepayers, and the long-term stability of our electric grid. We should keep these guardrails firmly in place.

Strong rules do not mean closing the door on innovation. Delaware can attract the right data centers—companies that operate efficiently, invest in clean energy, and respect the communities they join. Smaller, more efficient facilities and modern edge-computing operations can strengthen our economy without overwhelming infrastructure or changing the character of our towns.

We can also build a local technology ecosystem that creates good jobs for Delaware residents. Cybersecurity, IT services, fiber installation, and advanced manufacturing can all benefit from responsible development while keeping our economy competitive. Most importantly, smart zoning, transparent processes, and strong public oversight ensure residents—not outside corporations—help shape our communities’ future. We can welcome innovation while protecting our neighborhoods, our grid, and Delaware’s long-term interests.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

I support responsible economic development and innovation, including new technology, but Delaware families and small businesses should not be asked to subsidize the extraordinary energy demands of large data centers.

I would support evidence-based policies requiring large energy users to pay their fair share of the infrastructure and grid upgrades their projects require. Delaware should also require transparent assessments of a proposed facility’s projected electricity demand, impact on residential rates, grid reliability, water use, and environmental impact before major projects move forward.

At the same time, we must strengthen Delaware’s energy supply and grid reliability by supporting a diverse energy portfolio, including solar and other clean and renewable energy sources, while making decisions based on reliability, affordability, and measurable results.

Technology can create jobs and economic opportunity, and Delaware should welcome responsible investment. But growth must benefit the communities hosting it. My priority will always be protecting residents, seniors on fixed incomes, and small businesses from being forced to absorb costs created by major corporate energy users.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

When the Project Washington data center was first proposed, I attended the first town hall on the topic. I then joined Sierra Club’s Delaware chapter in canvassing the local neighborhoods to educate community members on the proposal and how they could voice concerns to county council. I was proud to be in the room when New Castle County Council passed the commonsense data center regulation ordinance.

The major concerns I have, and what I’ve heard from residents, are how data centers will increase our electric bills, affect our sleep and health, reduce our water quality and availability, decrease our property values, pollute our air with diesel generators, and harm our struggling wildlife populations.

At a state level I would:

• Support a data center moratorium
• Require data centers to pay for their own power generation and system upgrades instead of shifting costs to regular ratepayers
• Support a special tariff for large-load customers, including data centers, with demand of more than 75 megawatts
• Phase in renewable power purchase agreements specifically for data centers
• Mandate data centers reduce power usage during peak-demand events to stabilize local grids

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Delaware should welcome innovation and economic development, but residents and small businesses should not be forced to subsidize the enormous energy demands of large-scale data centers.

I support requiring large energy users to pay the infrastructure, transmission, capacity, and reliability costs their projects create rather than shifting those costs to other ratepayers. Delaware has already moved in this direction through HB 233, and I support strong implementation of those protections.

I would also support requiring large data centers to demonstrate how they will address their impact on grid reliability before connecting, including demand-response agreements where appropriate. Projects creating substantial new demand should also be encouraged to add generation, storage, or other capacity to the grid.

Transparency is equally important. Communities should know the expected electricity demand, infrastructure needs, water use, environmental impacts, and potential public costs of major projects before decisions are made.

Technology can create jobs and investment, but economic development should not mean higher utility bills or a less reliable grid for Delaware families.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

I would be supporting the national data center moratorium. Not only do we need further research into building AI data centers in a sustainable way but we need significant improvements in our power generation and grid systems before further taxing already over loaded systems. As an engineer, I tend to see things more from a scientific and functionality perspective.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Public service must be built on public trust, and that includes being honest about why electricity bills are climbing. Across the PJM region, soaring demand from AI data centers is driving up costs that land on ordinary families. I support policies that make large energy users, not residents, pay for the grid impact they create. Delaware’s proposal to set a separate, higher rate class for the biggest consumers, require them to cover their own transmission and distribution costs, and give the Public Service Commission real authority to protect ratepayers is a sound, evidence-based approach. I’d also require these facilities to reduce demand during grid emergencies to keep the system reliable, and direct part of their payments toward low-income energy assistance and clean energy programs. Longer term, Delaware should invest in renewable generation, battery storage, and efficiency so we can meet new demand without price shocks. Accountability means the companies profiting from our grid pay their fair share, and families get transparency about what they’re being charged and why.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Many communities are pausing on Data Center approvals to better understand the broader context. Delaware needs to initiate solutions for energy generation as well. I support, and hope you will help with, providing the big picture of science related issues, the pros and cons of various approaches, as well as potential future energy and environmental solutions that we should plan for and design for now.

FYI, I served on the Governor’s STEM Council under an earlier administration. My favorite STEM concept is systems thinking and understanding cause and effect. As a Librarian, we serve all subjects, science and more. A systems approach will be most effective.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

I would support policies that make large data centers pay their fair share of the electricity and grid infrastructure costs they create, rather than shifting those costs onto Delaware households. Delaware should require transparent analysis of a proposed data center’s expected electricity demand and grid impacts before approval, coordinate with PJM on reliability planning, and encourage energy efficiency, demand response programs, and on-site or contracted clean energy resources. I would also support targeted investments in transmission and grid modernization when they demonstrably improve reliability for all Delaware residents. The goal should be responsible economic development without allowing rapid AI driven electricity demand to increase utility bills or compromise grid reliability.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

AI-driven data centers present both opportunities and challenges for Delaware. They can bring investment and jobs, but they also raise legitimate concerns about electricity costs, grid reliability, and environmental impacts. Delawareans are already struggling with high electricity bills, and they shouldn’t be asked to subsidize data centers’ energy needs.

This session, I supported legislation that requires data center developers to generate all their own power within 10 years of opening, prevents them from utilizing job-creation tax credits, creates a separate large-load tariff so they pay a distinct electric rate and full infrastructure upgrade costs, and ensures they’re the first to be disconnected in a blackout. I sponsored legislation prohibiting state and local governments from using NDAs for large-scale data center projects so information about proposals with significant community impacts cannot be hidden from the public.

As additional projects are proposed, we must diligently evaluate their impacts on our electric grid, natural resources, and local infrastructure. If a project requires new electricity transmission, generation, or other infrastructure upgrades, the developer should bear those costs and not Delaware ratepayers.

Delaware welcomes responsible economic development, but not at the expense of our constituents’ electric bills or a reliable electric grid.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

I support responsible data-center development, but Delaware families and small businesses should not be forced to subsidize the enormous electricity demands of large technology companies.

AI-powered data centers can bring investment, construction jobs, and tax revenue. However, their growth must not increase electricity costs or weaken grid reliability for Delaware residents. I believe data centers should be largely self-sufficient by creating or directly securing the energy needed to operate. This could include on-site generation, renewable energy paired with battery storage, or other dependable energy sources that meet Delaware’s environmental and safety standards.

Data-center operators should also pay the full cost of the infrastructure required to serve them, including substations, transmission upgrades, and other grid improvements. Long-term contracts and substantial upfront financial commitments should protect ratepayers if a project is delayed, reduced, or abandoned.

Before receiving state approval or financial incentives, every major data-center proposal should undergo an independent review of its effects on electricity rates, grid reliability, water consumption, land use, and local infrastructure.

Delaware should welcome innovation and economic development, but growth must pay its own way. Those creating extraordinary electricity demand should provide the energy and infrastructure necessary to meet it—not pass those costs on to Delaware families.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

As a social scientist, in general I am committed to seeking out evidence-based solutions to the challenges that face Delaware. When we examine hyperscale datacenters, at this point there is little evidence to suggest they bring a benefit to Delaware, and plenty of evidence to show their risks, including economic and environmental. In particular, studies are finding that low frequency noise, which datacenters generate, has identifiable effects on sleep disorders, hearing loss, and even cardiovascular diseases. The potential impact on our electrical grid and costs is likely to be significant as well, even with the guardrails recently established by the legislature. The evidence argues for a moratorium now, so we can get ahead of this, and figure out what protections Delawareans need and what benefits, if any, hyperscale datacenters bring to us before it’s too late.

I have a simple mantra about datacenters. I don’t want to hear them, I don’t want to taste them, I don’t want to smell them, and I sure as heck don’t want to pay for them. Solve those issues, and we can talk about what, if any, long term benefits they bring.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

I am of the opinion that data centers will be needed to support our growing technology demands and, as a result, the power to run them. Since Delaware, in their abject ignorance has chosen to allow or eliminate all electricity production in the State, these data centers should be required to establish on site energy generation to sustain their power requirements. Any excess power they generate can be sold to the local utility (Delmarva Power) at market rates. New technologies such as Salt Reactors, Hydrogen, etc. Should be promoted by the State and cease all green nonsense until it becomes affordable.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

To protect Delaware residents from rising electricity costs and grid reliability risks driven by AI-driven data center growth, I support policies that prevent corporate energy burdens from being socialized onto everyday ratepayers. This includes establishing strict Public Service Commission oversight and special tariffs for high-energy facilities, requiring tech operators to fund necessary grid infrastructure and transmission upgrades directly, bringing rigor and transparency to regional PJM load forecasting, and collaborating regionally to advocate for wholesale market reforms that keep power affordable and reliable.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Delaware should welcome innovation and economic growth, but we must ensure that large-scale data center development does not shift unnecessary costs or reliability risks onto Delaware families and small businesses. I support evidence-based planning that requires transparency from large energy users, including evaluating their impact on grid capacity, infrastructure needs, and ratepayers. Data centers should be responsible partners in meeting the energy demands they create, including exploring options such as direct investment in grid improvements, energy efficiency measures, and responsible energy solutions. We must work with PJM and utility providers to use reliable data and long-term forecasting when making decisions. At the same time, Delaware should continue pursuing a diverse energy portfolio that prioritizes reliability, affordability, and innovation while protecting consumers from avoidable cost increases.

Q2 Delaware’s electricity is delivered through PJM interconnection, the regional grid operator for the mid-atlantic. Across the PJM region, electricity demand is rising in part due to large-scale data center development. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support addressing the effects of AI-driven data center growth on electricity costs and grid reliability for Delaware’s residents?

Delaware should welcome innovation and jobs, but not on the backs of families, seniors, and small businesses. Data centers and AI companies that require enormous amounts of electricity must pay their fair share for the new generation, transmission, substations, and grid upgrades they make necessary not shift those costs onto ratepayers.

I support transparent, independent cost and reliability reviews before large projects are approved; binding commitments on electricity use and construction timelines; and requirements that major new loads help provide reliable power or reduce demand during grid emergencies. We should also press PJM for honest forecasting, faster accountability, and no grid capacity reservations for speculative projects. Delaware needs practical, all of the above energy policy: protect dependable generation, build needed infrastructure, encourage efficiency and storage, and judge every proposal by reliability and cost not politics.

Innovation is welcome. Corporate welfare on your electric bill is not.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

The government ought to end its overreliance on the UN’s IPCC - UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. It ought to balance its perspective with the follow on to the prestigious NIPCC - Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change. Furthermore, Congress ought to “follow the money.” Indeed, take a hard look at such wrong-headed, deterministic studies as the 1972 “Limits To Growth” and follow the trail of funding of similar endeavors. Thank goodness President Trump withdrew the US from the Paris Climate Accord.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Climate change is the major battle of our generation and the next. Cutting greenhouse gas emissions is still important, but we have missed our window to have a significant impact on blunting future environmental disaster. Climate resilience will require interstate cooperation, review of building codes, improving infrastructure including our bridges, restoring our wetlands, and investing heavily in climate science and innovation.

Q7 The Attorney General’s office is responsible for enforcing state environmental laws, often in coordination with the Department of Natural Resources and Environment Control. What priorities, if any, would guide your office’s approach to enforcing environmental protections in Delaware?

Environmental justice and corporate accountability will drive our environmental enforcement strategy. While AG Jennings secured settlements against legacy chemical polluters like DuPont and Chemours over PFAS contamination, financial settlements negotiated after damage is done are not enough—especially when overburdened communities in New Castle County and across our state still live next to toxic industrial sites.

My office will maintain independent prosecutorial authority while coordinating closely with DNREC to shift from reactive settlements to proactive prevention and environmental justice: 1) Environmental Justice Mandate: Directing dedicated legal staff and investigative resources toward fence-line communities that have historically borne a disproportionate burden of industrial air and water pollution. 2) Real Community Remediation: Ensuring PFAS and toxic cleanup settlements directly fund local clean water infrastructure and health monitoring in impacted neighborhoods, rather than disappearing into general state coffers. 3) Strict Deterrence & Injunctive Relief: Seeking aggressive court orders and strict liability penalties against repeat industrial polluters to halt environmental harm in real time. Delawareans deserve an Attorney General who treats clean air and water as non-negotiable civil rights.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

As a coastal state, Delaware is already experiencing the impacts of sea level rise, stronger storms, and more frequent tidal flooding. The science is clear that we must prepare our communities while protecting both our environment and our economy.

I was proud to co-sponsor legislation strengthening Delaware’s wetlands protections because healthy wetlands are one of our most effective natural defenses against flooding. As a member of the House Natural Resources & Energy Committee, I have consistently supported policies that recognize protecting our environment is also an investment in our economy, our infrastructure, and our quality of life.

I support continued investments in living shorelines, marsh restoration, resilient infrastructure, improved stormwater management, and voluntary home elevation and flood mitigation programs. I also believe every major infrastructure and land use decision should account for future flood risk using the best available science.

Protecting Delaware’s coast requires partnership among state agencies, local governments, property owners, and conservation organizations. By making evidence-based investments today, we can better protect our communities, preserve our natural resources, and ensure future generations can continue to call Delaware’s coast home.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Delaware should prepare for increased flooding before families and taxpayers are forced to pay repeatedly for preventable damage. I support using current flood modeling and future sea-level and rainfall projections when Delaware plans roads, bridges, schools, wastewater systems, and other long-term public infrastructure.

We should modernize aging stormwater and drainage systems, particularly in communities experiencing repeated urban flooding, while protecting natural defenses such as wetlands, dunes, and shorelines. I also support targeted assistance that helps homeowners and communities invest in practical flood-mitigation measures before disaster occurs.

Our policies should recognize that resilience is not only a coastal issue. Increased rainfall and inadequate drainage can threaten neighborhoods throughout Delaware, including urban communities.

My approach is prevention, preparation, and responsible investment. If scientific evidence tells us where risks are increasing, government should use that information to protect residents, infrastructure, and taxpayer dollars rather than waiting until after homes, roads, and communities are damaged.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

I grew up in Wilmington, and as a mother, I think about the Delaware we are leaving to the next generation. I want children growing up here to inherit communities that are healthy, safe, and resilient. That requires confronting environmental racism and ensuring communities that have historically borne the greatest burden of pollution and environmental harm are prioritized as we respond to climate change.

I support fully implementing Delaware’s Climate Action Plan and developing a statewide coastal-resilience strategy that prioritizes communities most vulnerable to flooding. That means investing in natural protections like wetlands, marsh restoration, and living shorelines, alongside modernized stormwater infrastructure. We should also strengthen our laws so new development is planned around future flood and sea-level risks, not historical conditions.

Residents deserve clear information about risks facing their homes and a meaningful voice in how we respond. Where repeated flooding makes rebuilding unsustainable, I support voluntary buyouts and assistance to elevate or protect homes. Families should not be left to shoulder the costs of climate change and environmental damage alone, and we should hold major polluters accountable for the harm they cause. I also support a Green Amendment recognizing every Delawarean’s right to a clean and healthy environment.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

I would support wetland restoration that are fully planned out to consider any disruption of the ecosystem for tidal wetlands. I support potentially capping building density in vulnerable floodplains by incorporating something similar to the State of Oregan example of their Urban Growth Boundary (Basically, conservation of land but ensuring growth over a 20year period).

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Delaware is the lowest-lying state in the nation, and NOAA’s projections of increased tidal flooding are a warning we cannot ignore. I support planning and investing based on the best available science, including DNREC’s sea-level-rise planning scenarios, rather than outdated flood maps. That means funding nature-based solutions such as living shorelines, wetland and marsh restoration, and dune protection, all of which buffer communities at lower long-term cost than sea walls alone. We should update floodplain maps and building standards, require resilience in new development, and protect the roads, water systems, and schools that flooding puts at risk. I would prioritize resources for working-class and historically underinvested communities, which are often most exposed and least able to recover. As someone who has spent my career in land use and appraisal, I understand how flood risk shapes property values and generational wealth, and I will bring that lens to keeping Delaware families safe and their investments secure.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

If a house is destroyed due to flooding I believe new construction should follow new tidal change warnings. Whether the structure should be built on stilts or further from the coast, that should be taken into consideration.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

This situation has been slowly increasing over the years. It isnt uncommon to watch the ocean and the bay mix it up on RT 1, in Dewey. As wonderful as it is to live so close to the coastline, it comes with risks. Those risks are WELL KNOWN when you sign those mortgage papers. While I do support government assistance when these storms are severe, this is what homeowners and flood insurance is for. Each case should be evaluated individually. I would also support restricting further development of homes and businesses where flooding is inevitable.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Delaware is the lowest-lying state in the country, and I’ve seen what that means firsthand. In 2015, my family owned a home in Dagsboro when Hurricane Joaquin’s tidal surge flooded roads across Sussex County so badly we couldn’t leave our community for days. Our home was spared, but many of our neighbors’ weren’t. That’s not a projection to me — I lived it.

The data backs up what I saw: tidal flooding has increased 260% since 2000 in parts of Delaware, and over 9,500 properties are already at risk. I’d support fully and consistently funding Delaware’s Open Space Program, which curbs development in vulnerable areas and lets coastal ecosystems migrate inland. I’ll also push to finish updating coastal construction regulations to reflect current flood risk, and expand tools like DNREC’s I-ADAPT so local governments actually have the resources to plan, not just the mandate.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

I consider climate change to be the number one threat facing the nation, and Delaware is at particular risk of flooding due to the fact that it is the lowest lying state in the union. That said, the evidence shows that the effects of climate change will not be agnostic to race or economic class. Flooding in Delaware will disproportionately harm low-income and predominantly POC Delaware communities.

To that end, I believe a holistic approach is needed to ensure that our most vulnerable are equipped to deal with the increased flood risk. We need to invest in infrastructure that will preserve these communities, while working to pass a working class agenda that will grant them fair-paying jobs, quality education, and affordable housing. We cannot sit by and let low income neighborhoods be destroyed by flooding.

I fully support policies that reduce Delaware’s CO2 emissions, but we have to be cognizant of the fact that Delaware emits less than all but two other states. The federal government should be primarily responsible for green energy policies, while the states need to do what they can to mitigate the inevitable damage that climate change will cause.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Delaware’s flood risk isn’t only coastal. Sea levels here are rising at roughly twice the global average, and Lewes could see 135 high-tide flooding days a year by 2050. But New Castle County faces its own serious exposure — Wilmington’s Southbridge and Northeast neighborhoods flood regularly due to aging combined sewer systems and low elevation along the Christina and Brandywine, and inland communities like Newark see recurring stormwater flooding as heavier rainfall overwhelms drainage built for an earlier climate. These are often the same communities carrying other environmental burdens, and they deserve to be treated as a frontline priority alongside the beach towns.

I’d support modernizing stormwater and combined sewer infrastructure statewide, with funding prioritized toward historically underserved and flood-prone communities in Wilmington and Newark as well as coastal Sussex. I’d back updating floodplain maps to reflect future rainfall and runoff patterns, not just historical data, and continued investment in projects like the Southbridge Wetlands Park model, which includes green infrastructure paired with real community input to avoid displacement. I’d also support voluntary buyout and elevation programs for repetitive-loss properties statewide, and codifying the state’s flood-risk-avoidance standard into law so it can’t be undone by executive order alone.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

I have lived here all my life and own a river front lot. The normal tide that I have witnessed for the past 70 years has not changed.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Delaware is on the frontlines of sea level rise, and we must respond with science-based, proactive policies. I support expanding investments in nature-based solutions such as wetland restoration and living shorelines, which have been shown to reduce flooding while preserving ecosystems.

We should also strengthen coastal land-use planning by updating zoning and building codes to discourage development in high-risk areas and require flood-resilient construction standards. Strategic retreat and voluntary buyout programs must be available and adequately funded for the most vulnerable communities. I support increased funding for flood monitoring, data modeling, and early warning systems to improve local decision-making. Partnering with federal agencies like NOAA and leveraging their projections will help ensure our policies reflect the best available science.

Equity must remain central, resources should prioritize communities most at risk and least able to recover.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Delaware is a coastal state, period, so everyone will be impacted by flooding, salt-water intrusion and sea level rise at some point, even if it is as a bystander supporting neighbors. Continuing to work with experts on managed retreat, protection of wetlands and forested areas, the preservation of farmland, shoreline adaptation, stormwater management and other mitigation programs is essential. There is not a universal or singular approach to respond to increasing flood risk. This means getting many people around the table, including scientists, policymakers, residents, and state, county and other local government agencies.

Q7 The Attorney General’s office is responsible for enforcing state environmental laws, often in coordination with the Department of Natural Resources and Environment Control. What priorities, if any, would guide your office’s approach to enforcing environmental protections in Delaware?

I believe that the DOJ plays a critical role in environmental protection and environmental damages. Our office has already secured the largest environmental settlement in state history following an investigation into the DuPont company and other defendants. We also sued Monsanto for PCB contamination and dozens of Big Oil defendants for the damage that climate change has caused and will continue to cause to our state. We will continue to investigate and litigate when we believe Delawareans and our public resources have been harmed by industrial pollution and other environmental harms.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Delaware should take immediate steps to help coastal communities prepare for increased flooding while protecting residents and taxpayers. State funding should focus on improving drainage, restoring wetlands and dunes, and strengthening roads and other infrastructure in areas most at risk. These protections can reduce flood damage and help communities recover more quickly.

Homeowners, businesses, and local governments should also have access to accurate information about flood risks so they can make informed decisions about where and how to build. Stronger building standards should apply in areas most vulnerable to flooding, and homeowners should have access to affordable assistance to raise or strengthen their homes above flood levels.

Where there is repeated, serious flooding, Delaware should expand voluntary buyout programs that help owners within those areas move to safer areas rather than repeatedly rebuilding in the same locations. The state should also work closely with local and federal partners to make sure limited funding goes to communities facing the greatest risks. Thus, reducing future damage and costs ensuring that Delaware’s coastal communities are safe, livable, and economically strong.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Delaware’s vulnerability to coastal flooding requires us to plan ahead using the best available science while protecting homeowners, businesses, infrastructure, and taxpayer dollars.

I support continued investment in evidence-based flood mapping and risk assessments so state and local governments can make informed decisions based not only on historical flooding, but also on projected future conditions. We should strengthen stormwater and drainage infrastructure, protect wetlands and natural buffers, support beach and dune restoration, and expand the use of solutions such as living shorelines where they are effective.

I also support helping homeowners, communities, and small businesses understand their individual flood risks and access practical mitigation resources. State infrastructure investments should account for future flood conditions so taxpayers are not repeatedly paying to repair preventable damage.

Most importantly, these decisions should be made with communities, not simply for them. Residents, scientists, local governments, businesses, and environmental experts should all have a voice in developing long-term resilience strategies that protect both our communities and Delaware’s natural resources.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

As the lowest lying state, Delaware is on the front line of sea level rise. We are already facing the effects of tidal and inland flooding as well as salt water intrusion. NOAA now estimates that tidal areas could see flooding on more than 100 days per year by 2050. That’s a dramatic increase from the dozen or so we see today. I support significantly increasing our preparedness and taking action on multiple fronts.

Flood Mitigation

• Restore the ecosystems that dampen the effects of storms and protect against erosion like coastal wetlands, dunes, and reefs. Consider the addition of artificial reefs offshore to decrease erosion.
• Invest in green infrastructure and stormwater management projects like bioswales, rain gardens, and permeable ground surfaces.

Sustainable Development

• Update building codes to sustainable standards for the future such as requiring designs that anticipate higher flood elevations or temperature extremes.
• Elevate our energy infrastructure to increase its resilience.

Resident Protections

• Prepare for the possibility of strategic retreat wherein the state would support voluntary relocation for people and infrastructure located in areas facing severe risk.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Delaware’s coastal flooding risks affect homes, businesses, roads, wastewater systems, and public infrastructure. I support using the best available science on sea-level rise and flooding to guide state and local planning before repeated damage becomes even more costly.

That includes regularly updating flood-risk maps, identifying vulnerable infrastructure, and prioritizing investments in drainage, stormwater systems, floodproofing, wetlands, dunes, and living shorelines where those approaches are effective.

I also support expanding technical assistance and resilience funding for municipalities, especially smaller communities that may not have their own engineering or grant-writing capacity.

For properties experiencing repeated severe flooding, voluntary acquisition or relocation programs should remain an option when adaptation is no longer practical, with fair treatment for homeowners.

Delaware should approach resilience as both an environmental and economic issue. Investing earlier in proven flood-mitigation strategies can protect communities, reduce repeated property losses, and avoid shifting even greater recovery and infrastructure costs onto taxpayers later.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Delaware is the lowest-lying state in the country, and NOAA’s projections of worsening tidal flooding demand that we plan with the best available science. I support using DNREC’s sea-level-rise planning scenarios to guide development and infrastructure decisions, updating outdated flood maps and building standards, and investing in nature-based solutions such as wetland restoration, living shorelines, and open-space buffers, which protect communities more affordably than hardened structures alone. Resilience planning has to protect the roads, water systems, and schools our neighborhoods depend on, and it must reach the working families and lower-income areas most exposed to flooding and least able to bounce back. Where repeated flooding makes property unsafe, voluntary buyouts should be fairly funded. This connects to a concern I hear across District 9: overdevelopment that paves over the open space and natural drainage that once absorbed stormwater. Smarter, science-based land use both protects the environment and keeps families safe.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

In my youth I lived in Fenwick Island, off of Rt 54. One night, driving in the dark, I hit a wall of water on the road which shut off my car. In recent years, the road is raised above flooding.

We’re already seeing East Coast communities abandon houses on the edge. There needs to be evidence-based planning for newer development to be at a safer distance further inland. The loss of land is a statewide issue to support, with the communities hopefully realistic about climate effects.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

I would support evidence-based coastal resilience policies that prioritize protecting people, homes, infrastructure, and natural ecosystems from increasing tidal flooding. Delaware should expand flood-risk mapping and monitoring, invest in resilient roads, drainage, wastewater systems, and other critical infrastructure, and prioritize nature-based solutions such as wetlands and living shorelines where they are appropriate. State funding should be targeted toward communities with the greatest demonstrated risk, while helping residents access federal resilience and mitigation funds. We should also ensure that new development accounts for projected future flood risks rather than relying only on historical conditions.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Our beaches, bays, wetlands, and coastline are some of Delaware’s greatest assets. They support our economy, provide recreational opportunities, protect ecosystems, and are home to many Delawareans. Preserving these resources means addressing the risks posed by sea level rise, particularly as the nation’s lowest-lying state.

Many of Delaware’s coastal communities are already experiencing increased flooding from sea level rise and more powerful storms. As a state senator, I work closely with DNREC and other experts to address flooding. Delaware must continue investing in evidence-based strategies to reduce flooding, including upgrading stormwater and drainage systems, improving land-use planning, and expanding nature-based solutions like wetland restoration and living shorelines that absorb storm impacts while protecting natural resources. These investments must reach the communities most vulnerable to flooding and be developed in partnership with residents.

While sea level rise and flooding cause challenges for coastal communities, increased flooding is not limited to the coastline. Communities across Delaware, including those in my district in New Castle County, are experiencing more frequent and severe flooding, causing washed-out roads, flash floods, and property damage. Meeting these challenges requires a statewide commitment while recognizing that solutions must be customized to the needs of impacted communities.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Delaware’s coastline is one of our state’s greatest assets, but it also makes many communities increasingly vulnerable to tidal flooding. We should rely on sound science and practical solutions to protect our homes, businesses, roads, and public infrastructure while being responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars.

I support investing in resilient infrastructure, including improved stormwater systems, elevating vulnerable roadways, strengthening flood-control projects, and restoring wetlands and natural shorelines that help absorb floodwaters. These investments reduce long-term damage while protecting our environment.

We should also work closely with local governments, emergency management officials, property owners, and the federal government to secure funding for flood mitigation projects. Delaware should aggressively pursue federal grants to reduce the financial burden on state taxpayers.

As development continues, new construction in flood-prone areas should follow modern, evidence-based building standards that improve resilience without placing unnecessary burdens on homeowners or small businesses.

Finally, we must strengthen emergency preparedness through better flood warning systems, evacuation planning, and public education so families have the information they need before storms occur.

Protecting Delaware’s coastal communities is not a partisan issue. It is about safeguarding our residents, preserving our economy, and making smart investments that strengthen our communities for future generations.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Human-caused global climate change is real. There is no room to question this; the science is absolutely clear. Unfortunately, we did not begin serious efforts to combat climate change long enough ago and now we’re facing the results. We must recognize that we will have to adapt and mitigate the immediate effects while redoubling efforts to ultimately eliminate reliance on carbon-burning fuels. This will not be easy and will not be fixed tomorrow.

Mitigation and adaptation need to follow the science, as we protect our coastlines and inland waterways. Some change seems inevitable now, including severe weather different from what we’ve had before and a change in wildlife habitats and patterns. Adapting this change will require interaction and cooperation across all of state and local government, and the need for broad cooperation rather than competition.

The 2025 Delaware Climate Action Plan from DNREC lays out a comprehensive agenda for what needs to be done to address climate resiliency, but it’s just a start unless we pass the laws that implement and pay for it. We must also strengthen the Coastal Zone Act. The General Assembly will need to tackle these issues in the next legislative session, and if elected, I look forward to joining that fight.

Q7 The Attorney General’s office is responsible for enforcing state environmental laws, often in coordination with the Department of Natural Resources and Environment Control. What priorities, if any, would guide your office’s approach to enforcing environmental protections in Delaware?

The Attorney General has an obligation to uphold the Law. I intend to work alongside DNREC to ensure that their agency is supported and has the resources required to fulfill their duties in protecting and preserving Delaware and her people. Delaware is a special place and if Delaware’s ecosystems and environment are at risk, this could impact our vast wildlife and Delawareans for generations to come. I intend to be fair and communicative when handling matters of the Law, especially as it pertains to the health and well-being of all living things.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

If one chooses build or live on or near the water, one must be prepared to address such issues when they arise.While emergency services funded by government would be activated should lives be at risk, it is not the responsibility of the State to bail out those who made these choices and lose their property. This is what insurance is for.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

To help Delaware’s coastal communities respond to increasing tidal flooding and sea level rise, I support a proactive, science-driven resilience strategy. This includes investing in nature-based solutions like wetland restoration and living shorelines to naturally absorb storm surges, updating state infrastructure and building codes to withstand higher water baselines, and incorporating NOAA and local data projections directly into municipal land-use planning. Additionally, I support empowering local governments with technical and financial resources (such as expanding participation in FEMA’s Community Rating System) to protect vulnerable properties, secure evacuation routes, and safeguard our coastal economy without placing an unfair burden on local taxpayers.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Delaware’s coastal communities are a vital part of our state’s economy, heritage, and way of life. I support using reliable data and scientific research to better understand coastal flooding risks and make responsible decisions. We should prioritize practical solutions such as improving stormwater management, maintaining and strengthening critical infrastructure, preserving natural protections like wetlands where appropriate, and ensuring communities have access to accurate information and emergency preparedness resources. Any policies should balance environmental concerns with the needs of homeowners, farmers, businesses, and local governments. Decisions should be based on evidence, cost-effectiveness, and long-term planning rather than fear or politics. Delaware must be proactive in protecting residents and infrastructure while respecting property rights and the unique character of our coastal communities.

Q3 Federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) project that Delaware’s coastal communities face increasing risk of tidal flooding in the coming decades. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to help these communities respond to increased coastal flooding risk?

Coastal flooding is not a theory for Delaware families. It is already affecting roads, homes, businesses, drinking water, and access for coastal communities. We should meet that challenge with practical solutions that protect both people and property rights.

I support using the best available flood data to guide infrastructure investments, strengthen drainage, elevate vulnerable roads and utilities, and improve emergency alerts. We should prioritize proven protections such as beach restoration, dunes, wetlands, living shorelines, and better stormwater systems where they make sense.

Homeowners and local governments need access to grants, flood mitigation funding, and clear, honest information about risks before they buy, build, or rebuild. State government should be a partner, not impose one size fits all mandates from Dover. When a community faces repeated severe flooding, residents must have a real voice in deciding whether to protect, elevate, rebuild, or pursue voluntary buyouts.

Our goal should be simple: protect Delaware communities, protect taxpayer dollars, and protect the right of families to make informed decisions about their homes.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

As a physician, I believe in evidence-based medicine and data-driven and pragmatic policy. Parents and their children need to know the truth about substance use - and we need to be open and honest as a society about the steps necessary to advance recovery, which includes investment in mental health programs and improving the social and economic outlook of our communities.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

As a member of the House Education Committee, I believe addressing youth substance use begins by creating school environments where every student feels safe, supported, and connected. Research consistently shows that positive school culture and climate are among the strongest protective factors against substance use, mental health challenges, and other risky behaviors.

That is why I have focused my legislative work on strengthening school culture and climate, expanding student supports, and ensuring schools have the tools they need to help students before they reach a crisis. I have also supported legislation strengthening labeling requirements for THC products to better protect young people and consumers.

We must continue investing in evidence-based prevention; I support expanding school based mental health services, strengthening partnerships between schools and families, increasing access to counselors and behavioral health professionals, and providing age appropriate, evidence-based substance use education.

As an educator, I know students learn best when they feel connected to their schools and have trusted adults they can turn to. As a legislator, I will continue supporting policies that improve school climate, strengthen student wellbeing, and use data, including the Delaware School Survey, to ensure we are investing in prevention strategies that produce measurable results.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

I believe Delaware should address youth substance use through prevention, education, early intervention, and treatment—not simply punishment. The decline in the number of young people who perceive regular marijuana use as risky tells us we need honest, age-appropriate education about marijuana, vaping, opioids, alcohol, and prescription-drug misuse before unhealthy patterns begin.

I support evidence-based prevention programs in schools and communities, greater access to behavioral health and substance-use counseling, and training for parents, educators, and mentors to recognize warning signs and connect young people with help early. Delaware should continue using the Delaware School Survey and other public-health data to measure which programs actually reduce youth substance use and direct funding toward approaches producing results.

Prevention also means investing in young people themselves. Mentoring, recreation, arts, workforce development, and meaningful after-school opportunities can strengthen the protective factors that keep young people connected and engaged.

Adult legalization should never mean normalization of drug use among children. Our responsibility is to educate young people honestly, intervene early, and give them healthy opportunities to thrive.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

As a mother, aunt, and godmother, this trend alarms me! The answer is not fear-based messaging or a return to the failed War on Drugs. Punitive drug policies have disproportionately harmed Black and Brown communities. We need prevention that is honest, evidence-based, and focused on giving young people the support they need to make healthy choices.

I support fully funding prevention efforts in Delaware schools and communities, including age-appropriate education, peer-to-peer campaigns like #MyReasonWhyDE, and screening that connects young people struggling with mental health or substance use to support early. We should also invest in what helps young people thrive: accessible mental health care, quality education and after-school programs, affordable housing, and livable wages.

Now that recreational marijuana is legal in Delaware, we must make sure the cannabis industry is not targeting young people. I support strong restrictions on marketing and packaging that appeal to kids, meaningful age verification, and monitoring youth use. As an educator, mother, and previous school board member, I know the research shows that young people respond better when we give them a voice in the conversation and meaningful adult support & guidance, not when we try to scare or punish them into making good choices.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

I would support youth access to resources and activities in mentorship programs, extracurricular acitivites and after-school programs. It is so important for this reason and so many more to get back to nurturing family environments and partnerships with school systems. Additionally, we need to be more aware of young people and their mental health given the significant correlation between drug use and mental health issues.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

The sharp drop in how many 11th graders see risk in regular marijuana use tells us prevention has to evolve, especially now that adult-use cannabis is legal in Delaware. I support evidence-based, school-based prevention programs that give accurate information about the developing brain rather than scare tactics, paired with the mental-health supports young people actually need. Substance use is often a symptom of deeper stress like trauma, poverty, and isolation, so I would invest in the protective factors research shows work best: strong schools, after-school and mentoring programs, family engagement, and accessible counseling. I would sustain and expand prevention funding through the Division of Public Health, direct opioid-settlement dollars toward youth programming, and enforce strict limits on youth-targeted marketing and access to cannabis and vaping products. We should measure what works using tools like the Delaware School Survey and fund the programs that show results. Keeping young people healthy is both a public-health and an economic-opportunity issue, and I will treat it as both.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Parents need to be more involved in holding their children accountable. Drug use is simply not good! Also the law allows criminals doing drugs to not have harsh consequences. They are literally giving drug paraphernalia to users. Horrible example for the youth!

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Education! Families need to have these conversations with their children. Start early and often! Once is not enough. Check-in with your kids! Once you have had the initial conversation, continue with easy, short check-in’s. Have examples, information and resources available. If your child has experimented, talk about it. Be engaged with your kids, but don’t use anger. Care and concern goes a long way. But NEVER pretend it isnt happening. Face the issue head on.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

That drop in perceived risk — from 50% to 26% — tracks almost exactly with Delaware’s move to decriminalize in 2015 and legalize recreational marijuana in 2023. Legalization for adults was the right call, but we can’t pretend normalization doesn’t reach kids too, and the evidence says prevention has to evolve with it, not just keep repeating old messaging.

I’d support sustained, full funding for DSAMH’s evidence-based prevention framework, strict limits on cannabis marketing and packaging that could appeal to minors, and continued retail compliance checks like those already used for tobacco and vape sales to anyone under 21. And since youth substance use and mental health are deeply linked I’d tie prevention funding directly to expanding school-based mental health support, not just standalone drug education.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

I support a strong evidence based approach to preventing substance abuse among Delaware’s youngest children. I would support expanding prevention education in schools and increasing access to counseling and intervention.

I consider one of the best methods of prevention to be generally increasing the quality of life for working class families. Drugs are often used as a coping mechanism for dealing with an extremely stressful everyday existence. Fair paying jobs, quality education, affordable housing, and ample investment in youth programs will all reduce drug usage.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Because lower perceived risk is one of the strongest predictors of rising use, I’d focus on evidence-based, age appropriate interventions rather than messaging alone.

I’d like to see Delaware revisit raising cigarette and vapor product taxes and closing the gap so that e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches are taxed like tobacco. HB 215 attempted this last session but died without a House floor vote. Price increases are one of the most effective, well-documented tools for reducing youth initiation because teens are more price-sensitive than adult users. With nearly 20% of Delaware high schoolers vaping, I’ll push to bring this back next session.

Beyond pricing, I’d prioritize what the research actually supports: evidence-based school curricula that build refusal and decision-making skills (not scare-tactic assemblies, which don’t work), family-based programs that strengthen parental monitoring and communication, and expanded screening in pediatric primary care to catch early use. I’d also support directing more opioid settlement funds toward youth-specific prevention programming, not just treatment.

Since perceived risk is falling for marijuana use, retailers should face strict age-verification and marketing restrictions keeping cannabis advertising away from youth, similar to alcohol and tobacco rules, paired with public health messaging grounded in accurate, non-exaggerated risk information.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

This was answered below. This organization needs much more support form the public with financing and volunteering,

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Addressing youth substance use requires a comprehensive, evidence-based approach grounded in prevention, education, and early intervention. I support expanding school- and community-based prevention programs that use proven models, such as social-emotional learning and peer-led initiatives, which have been shown to reduce substance use. We must also modernize public health messaging. As perceptions of cannabis risk decline, education should focus on brain development, mental health impacts, and impaired driving, delivered in a way that is credible and age-appropriate.

Increasing access to school-based mental health services is critical, as untreated anxiety and depression are key risk factors for substance use. I also support screening and early intervention programs, including SBIRT (Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment), in schools and primary care settings.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

I think it is important to create opportunities for people to learn and to be educated about what’s out there. With the legalization of marijuana in Delaware and the proliferation of CBD and THC products there is an opportunity to educate about marijuana and other substances. As a former beer brewer and brewery owner education for people at all ages about the dangers of substance abuse, whether it is drugs or alcohol is paramount.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Delaware should strengthen youth substance-use prevention by expanding evidence-based school and community programs, such as “Students on a Quest Uniting Against Drugs” or Peer Outreach for Prevention.” Public awareness campaigns can help explain the effects of substance use on adolescent brain development. Schools should also provide mental health screenings and family-focused support, since anxiety, trauma, and other mental health concerns can contribute to substance use.

Stronger enforcement of retail laws, limits on youth-targeted marketing, and better medication disposal options can also reduce access. Education, mental health support, family involvement, and prevention strategies can help Delaware youth make healthier and more informed choices.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Preventing youth substance use requires more than simply telling young people not to use drugs. We need to understand why young people are using substances and invest in prevention strategies that have demonstrated results.

I support age-appropriate, evidence-based education about marijuana, alcohol, tobacco, vaping, opioids, and other substances, including honest information about their effects on adolescent health and development. Delaware should continue using data such as the Delaware School Survey to identify trends and evaluate whether prevention programs are actually working.

Prevention must also include stronger access to school counselors, mental health professionals, mentoring, after-school programs, and early intervention services. Parents and caregivers should be provided with resources to recognize warning signs and have informed conversations with their children.

When a young person is already struggling with substance use, our response should include treatment and support rather than relying solely on punishment. I believe the strongest approach combines education, prevention, family engagement, mental health support, and accountability while continually measuring outcomes and adjusting our strategies based on evidence.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

I know it’s important we recognize youth substance use as a problem of public health and systems, not some individual failing. We need to understand the root causes in our communities and an individual’s life to effectively address each person’s needs. I believe our state can best prevent substance use in kids by funding evidence-based school programs, improving access to youth behavioral healthcare, and offering treatment not punishment.

I would support:

• Funding evidence-based and age-appropriate programs that offer prevention education in all K-12 schools, for all grades.
• Running youth-focused media campaigns highlighting the risks of substance use on developing brains.
• Expanding the use of the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment model, which is mandatory under Medicaid, to all children to regularly screen for behavioral health needs and connect young people to care.
• Addressing shortages of behavioral health providers by funding training, loan forgiveness, and telehealth infrastructure specifically for youth services.
• Ensuring youth struggling with substance abuse problems are given a treatment and support plan, not incarceration.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Reducing youth substance use requires prevention, education, early intervention, and access to support.

I support age-appropriate, evidence-based health education that gives students accurate information about marijuana, opioids, vaping, alcohol, and other substances while building decision-making and coping skills.

Schools should also have stronger access to mental health services, screening, and connections to treatment when a young person is already struggling. Family engagement, mentorship, extracurricular activities, and strong school connectedness are also important protective factors and should be part of Delaware’s prevention strategy.

I support strict enforcement of age restrictions and protections against marketing cannabis, nicotine, or other regulated substances in ways designed to appeal to minors.

Finally, Delaware should continue using the Delaware School Survey and other outcome data to measure which programs actually reduce substance use. Programs that demonstrate results should be expanded; those that do not should be improved or replaced.

The goal should be to prevent substance use, intervene early, and help young people get support when they need it.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Keeping young people safe and healthy is personal to me. I worked in health care at ChristianaCare for years, so I’ve seen firsthand what happens when prevention and mental-health support come too late. The steep decline in how many 11th graders see risk in regular marijuana use, especially now that adult-use cannabis is legal in Delaware, tells us our prevention approach needs to be updated and grounded in evidence. I support school-based prevention that gives students honest, accurate information about the developing brain, paired with the mental-health supports too many of our struggling schools lack. Because substance use so often grows out of stress, trauma, and lack of opportunity, I’d invest in protective factors that research backs: counselors and social workers in schools, after-school and mentoring programs, and family support. I’d sustain prevention funding through the Division of Public Health, put opioid-settlement dollars to work for youth, and enforce firm limits on youth-targeted marketing and underage access to cannabis and vaping. And I’d hold programs accountable by tracking results through tools like the Delaware School Survey and funding what actually works.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Start by addressing the issue within the current system. What is the effectiveness of the youth substance-use prevention programs – does this survey result mean they are not working? Is the 11th graders view of risk more realistic now? There are many dangers, safety issues for teens. This is one question out of context, what about alcohol use? What is the greater context of the youths’ lives?

I look forward to working with the network of scientists to address all the improvements needed in a systematic approach.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

I would support strengthening evidence-based prevention and early intervention programs in Delaware schools and communities, while making sure young people have access to mental health and substance use services when prevention alone is not enough. The decline in the perception that regular marijuana use is risky shows why sustained, age appropriate education is important. Delaware should use the Delaware School Survey and other public health data to identify trends, target resources to communities and populations with higher risk, and evaluate programs based on measurable outcomes. Prevention should address marijuana, nicotine, alcohol, opioids, and other substances, while giving parents, educators, and students practical information about the health, academic, and developmental consequences of substance use.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Substance use among young people can result in serious physical and mental health consequences, negatively impact academic performance, and increase the long-term risk for addiction and overdose. Any approach to addressing this topic must acknowledge that addiction is a complicated issue influenced by many factors, including mental health, trauma, and social determinants of health.

There is no single policy solution that will address this issue. Still, as a state senator, I believe our approach must be guided by the best available scientific evidence and by prevention and treatment strategies with proven effectiveness. I support increasing investment in age-appropriate, evidence-based strategies that help prevent substance use, including prevention and life-skills education in K-12 schools, expanded mental health supports for young people, and increased access to school-based health resources.

Any effective strategy will require collaboration among students, parents, schools, health care providers, and community organizations. Because substance use trends continuously evolve, our prevention and treatment strategies must be regularly informed by data and the experiences of young people and their families. Our goal should be to provide young people with the education and supports they need to make healthy, informed choices while ensuring those facing substance use challenges receive the care they need.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Protecting our children from substance abuse requires a balanced approach centered on prevention, education, treatment, and accountability. The decline in young people’s perception of the risks of regular marijuana use is concerning because research shows early substance use can affect brain development, mental health, and academic success.

I support expanding evidence-based prevention programs in our schools that provide honest, age-appropriate education about the risks of marijuana, opioids, vaping, alcohol, and other drugs. These programs should actively involve parents, educators, healthcare professionals, and community organizations.

We must also increase access to school-based mental health services and counseling. Many young people struggling with substance use are also dealing with anxiety, depression, trauma, or family challenges. Addressing these underlying issues can reduce the likelihood of drug use before it begins.

Law enforcement should continue targeting those who illegally sell drugs to minors and combat the flow of fentanyl into our communities. At the same time, young people with substance use disorders should have timely access to treatment and recovery services.

By combining prevention, mental health support, parental involvement, and targeted enforcement, Delaware can reduce youth substance use and help every child build a healthier, more successful future.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Youth substance-use programs should continue to be funded and continue to emphasize good choices. However, the choices of programs used should be driven by research that shows what works. “Just say No” was once very popular, but was a clear failure. More recently, research by Stanford University’s REACH Lab shows that an effective approach is to both encourage abstention and provide harm reduction education. Young people should be taught about the risks, should be encouraged to abstain, but also should be made aware of how to minimize harm if they or their friends do not abstain. The key is to follow the research and make adjustments in programs as better research gives us a clearer sense of how to address the problem.

The statistic in this question is an example of the challenge. Students may perceive less risk in marijuana for many reasons, including that much more dangerous drugs, including opioids, are readily accessible. This particular statistic doesn’t say they are more likely to use marijuana than in 1999, just that they don’t see it as risky today as youth once did.

A quick search shows that according to the Delaware YRBS, the percentage of high school students using marijuana in the prior 30 days dropped from 29% to 18% between 1999 and 2023. This doesn’t suggest there is no problem, just that we need to understand the importance of interpreting data correctly.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Because cannabis was ridiculously caegirized as a schedule 1 drug by the Feds, no research into the effects of cannabis use was funded in the US. Israel, however, has some enlightening data of those who used cannabis and the effects fed to American by these drug czars is mostly fiction. The fata supporting a reduction in the usage is a positive. But, lets be honest, kids will experiment. We need to ensure they are educated with fact based data and not the propaganda that has been spread for decades.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

To address youth substance use and counter the decline in perceived risk, I support modernizing our prevention strategies with evidence-based education. We need robust, peer-reviewed prevention programs in our schools that provide accurate information regarding the physiological impacts of high-potency products, synthetic drugs, and cannabis on developing brains. Furthermore, I support directing state resources to expand youth mental health services, early intervention counseling, and after-school community programs that address the root causes of substance use, ensuring our schools and public health agencies work hand-in-hand to keep students safe.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Protecting Delaware’s youth from substance abuse requires a balanced approach focused on prevention, education, accountability, and access to resources. I support evidence-based prevention programs that provide students with accurate information about the risks of drug and alcohol use, while also strengthening partnerships between schools, families, law enforcement, healthcare providers, and community organizations. We should evaluate programs based on measurable outcomes and invest in approaches that are proven to reduce substance use, not simply increase spending without results. Early intervention, mental health resources, mentoring programs, and support for families are important tools in preventing addiction before it begins. Marijuana and other substance use among youth should not be normalized. Delaware should continue using data to guide policy decisions and ensure we are helping young people make informed choices that protect their health and future.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Delaware must be honest with young people about the risks of drug use and give parents, teachers, and communities the tools to act early. When fewer students see regular marijuana use as harmful, we cannot respond with silence or slogans.

I support funding prevention programs that have evidence of results, including school based education that teaches students how to handle peer pressure, family programs that help parents have informed conversations, and mentorship and after school opportunities that give young people support and purpose.

Schools should have access to trained counselors and straightforward referral systems so students showing early signs of substance use can get help before a mistake becomes an addiction. Parents must be informed and involved, while student privacy and due process are respected.

I also support clear enforcement against selling or marketing marijuana, vaping products, alcohol, or illegal drugs to minors. Every program receiving taxpayer funding should measure outcomes and prove it is reducing youth drug use.

Our message should be clear: Delaware believes in second chances, but we will do everything possible to prevent a child from needing one.

Q4 The U.S. Senate confirms presidential appointments to agencies that shape national science policy, including the directors of the NIH, NSF, and the Office of Science and Technology Policy. What qualifications, if any, would you prioritize when evaluating nominees to lead federal scientific agencies.

As someone with a terminal research degree, I would start with competence and integrity: substantial experience in the science an agency supports, demonstrated respect for peer review and reproducibility, and the ability to manage a large public institution. A nominee should disclose conflicts, protect research from partisan or commercial interference, explain uncertainty honestly, and defend the lawful work of career scientists.

Science can tell us what evidence supports; it cannot by itself settle questions of values, budgets, or rights. I would therefore ask whether a nominee can translate evidence into decisions without hiding those democratic choices behind expertise.

The Senate’s job is not to demand ideological conformity. It is to determine whether a nominee will steward public money, preserve public trust, publish methods and results where law permits, correct errors openly, and keep an agency capable of serving the whole country. I would reject a nominee who treats expertise as a loyalty test, suppresses inconvenient findings, or confuses scientific leadership with obedience to a president or donor.

Q5 State Attorney Generals often join multistate coalitions on matters affecting their residents, including cases involving environmental regulation, public health, and consumer protection. What approach, if any, would you take to deciding when Delaware should participate in multistate legal action on science/health related issues?

As Attorney General, I will make Delaware an active, leading force in multistate legal action rather than a passive participant. While Delaware joined multi-state opioid litigation under AG Kathy Jennings, our state too often signs onto national lawsuits after other states have done the heavy lifting—or sits on the sidelines entirely during crucial corporate challenges, such as major anti-competitive media mergers.

My decision framework will proactively evaluate three criteria: 1) Direct Impact on Delawareans: Actionable harm to our residents, particularly frontline and historically underrepresented communities facing environmental or healthcare barriers. 2) Scientific & Empirical Consensus: Prioritizing actions grounded in rigorous research, including defending reproductive health equity, protecting climate regulations, and curbing toxic industrial emissions. 3)Federal Inaction: Stepping in aggressively when federal regulators lapse or fail to hold national corporate monopolies accountable.

Rather than viewing Delaware as the state of incorporation that avoids rocking the boat, my administration will leverage our unique corporate and legal standing to co-lead multistate coalitions early. We will initiate enforcement actions that set nationwide precedents for public health, clean water, and consumer safety.

Q5 State Attorney Generals often join multistate coalitions on matters affecting their residents, including cases involving environmental regulation, public health, and consumer protection. What approach, if any, would you take to deciding when Delaware should participate in multistate legal action on science/health related issues?

We base every litigation decision on harm to Delawareans and standing. In the last two years alone we’ve have been extremely active on cases defending science and research. Litigation files by this office has preserved nearly $25 million in research funded by the NIH, Department of Energy, and National Science Foundation. We’ve likewise been very active litigants in multistate EPA issues (e.g., ozone and emissions standards, smog and clean air rules), and that doesn’t even cover the cases where Delaware has been the sole plaintiff (PFAS contamination, PCB contamination, and our litiation against more than 30 Big Oil defendants, to name a few). Environmental stewardship and its public health impacts are kitchen table issues in Delaware and we will continue to take an extremely aggressive posture on anyone—whether a private actor or the federal government—that threatens those priorities.

Q4 The U.S. Senate confirms presidential appointments to agencies that shape national science policy, including the directors of the NIH, NSF, and the Office of Science and Technology Policy. What qualifications, if any, would you prioritize when evaluating nominees to lead federal scientific agencies.

All of these are highly technical appointments. I would be looking for back experience with scientific integrity by way of published papers that were peer reviewed, experience leading research projects, and experience allocating government funding for advancement in their field. I would also, given my desires for government transparency, would be looking for someone willing to publish negative or contradictory findings and be digging into their background too look if they would be able to be pressured by the current administration.

Q5 State Attorney Generals often join multistate coalitions on matters affecting their residents, including cases involving environmental regulation, public health, and consumer protection. What approach, if any, would you take to deciding when Delaware should participate in multistate legal action on science/health related issues?

When making decisions about joining multistate initiatives, there will be many factors taken into consideration. As Delaware’s next Attorney General, my first priority will be the people of Delaware and making sure their needs are being met. If the issue is one that is directly affecting Delawareans and their well-being, and participating in such an initiative would improve their well-being, it would be considered. I believe in objective government transparency and in public trust and I believe that listening to Delawareans about topics, such as this, matter greatly. I would not, however, participate in such an initiative if the efforts from my office would be redundant and take-away from more pressing matters involving Delaware, if the resources needed would take away from Delaware residents or if joining these efforts would knowingly negatively impact Delaware.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

As a physician, I believe in evidence-based medicine and data-driven and pragmatic policy. Parents and their children need to know the truth about substance use - and we need to be open and honest as a society about the steps necessary to advance recovery, which includes investment in mental health programs and improving the social and economic outlook of our communities.

Q6 The Attorney General’s office enforces Delaware’s consumer protection laws, which can apply to false or misleading health-related claims, including in the marketing of dietary supplements and alternative medical products. What approach, if any, would you take to consumer protection enforcement in cases involving unsupported health or scientific claims?

Fraudulent health claims are a serious public safety threat. While Delaware’s Consumer Protection Unit under AG Jennings handles standard consumer fraud, enforcement around misleading health claims has remained largely complaint-driven—reacting only after Delawareans have already suffered financial loss or health harms.

My administration will transform consumer protection from a reactive agency into a proactive watchdog. We will establish a dedicated science and health advocacy pipeline within the Consumer Protection Unit, partnering directly with medical research institutions, public health experts, and federal regulators (FDA/FTC) to actively monitor deceptive marketing trends before widespread harm occurs.

We will aggressively target predatory companies exploiting seniors, chronic illness patients, and low-income families seeking accessible care with unproven medical claims. Furthermore, we will move beyond standard financial settlements—which large corporations treat as a cost of doing business—by prioritizing immediate injunctive relief to halt deceptive sales instantly, securing full restitution for defrauded consumers, and seeking structural remedies that prevent repeat offenses in Delaware.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

As a member of the House Education Committee, I believe addressing youth substance use begins by creating school environments where every student feels safe, supported, and connected. Research consistently shows that positive school culture and climate are among the strongest protective factors against substance use, mental health challenges, and other risky behaviors.

That is why I have focused my legislative work on strengthening school culture and climate, expanding student supports, and ensuring schools have the tools they need to help students before they reach a crisis. I have also supported legislation strengthening labeling requirements for THC products to better protect young people and consumers.

We must continue investing in evidence-based prevention; I support expanding school based mental health services, strengthening partnerships between schools and families, increasing access to counselors and behavioral health professionals, and providing age appropriate, evidence-based substance use education.

As an educator, I know students learn best when they feel connected to their schools and have trusted adults they can turn to. As a legislator, I will continue supporting policies that improve school climate, strengthen student wellbeing, and use data, including the Delaware School Survey, to ensure we are investing in prevention strategies that produce measurable results.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

I believe Delaware should address youth substance use through prevention, education, early intervention, and treatment—not simply punishment. The decline in the number of young people who perceive regular marijuana use as risky tells us we need honest, age-appropriate education about marijuana, vaping, opioids, alcohol, and prescription-drug misuse before unhealthy patterns begin.

I support evidence-based prevention programs in schools and communities, greater access to behavioral health and substance-use counseling, and training for parents, educators, and mentors to recognize warning signs and connect young people with help early. Delaware should continue using the Delaware School Survey and other public-health data to measure which programs actually reduce youth substance use and direct funding toward approaches producing results.

Prevention also means investing in young people themselves. Mentoring, recreation, arts, workforce development, and meaningful after-school opportunities can strengthen the protective factors that keep young people connected and engaged.

Adult legalization should never mean normalization of drug use among children. Our responsibility is to educate young people honestly, intervene early, and give them healthy opportunities to thrive.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

As a mother, aunt, and godmother, this trend alarms me! The answer is not fear-based messaging or a return to the failed War on Drugs. Punitive drug policies have disproportionately harmed Black and Brown communities. We need prevention that is honest, evidence-based, and focused on giving young people the support they need to make healthy choices.

I support fully funding prevention efforts in Delaware schools and communities, including age-appropriate education, peer-to-peer campaigns like #MyReasonWhyDE, and screening that connects young people struggling with mental health or substance use to support early. We should also invest in what helps young people thrive: accessible mental health care, quality education and after-school programs, affordable housing, and livable wages.

Now that recreational marijuana is legal in Delaware, we must make sure the cannabis industry is not targeting young people. I support strong restrictions on marketing and packaging that appeal to kids, meaningful age verification, and monitoring youth use. As an educator, mother, and previous school board member, I know the research shows that young people respond better when we give them a voice in the conversation and meaningful adult support & guidance, not when we try to scare or punish them into making good choices.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

I would support youth access to resources and activities in mentorship programs, extracurricular acitivites and after-school programs. It is so important for this reason and so many more to get back to nurturing family environments and partnerships with school systems. Additionally, we need to be more aware of young people and their mental health given the significant correlation between drug use and mental health issues.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

The sharp drop in how many 11th graders see risk in regular marijuana use tells us prevention has to evolve, especially now that adult-use cannabis is legal in Delaware. I support evidence-based, school-based prevention programs that give accurate information about the developing brain rather than scare tactics, paired with the mental-health supports young people actually need. Substance use is often a symptom of deeper stress like trauma, poverty, and isolation, so I would invest in the protective factors research shows work best: strong schools, after-school and mentoring programs, family engagement, and accessible counseling. I would sustain and expand prevention funding through the Division of Public Health, direct opioid-settlement dollars toward youth programming, and enforce strict limits on youth-targeted marketing and access to cannabis and vaping products. We should measure what works using tools like the Delaware School Survey and fund the programs that show results. Keeping young people healthy is both a public-health and an economic-opportunity issue, and I will treat it as both.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Parents need to be more involved in holding their children accountable. Drug use is simply not good! Also the law allows criminals doing drugs to not have harsh consequences. They are literally giving drug paraphernalia to users. Horrible example for the youth!

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Education! Families need to have these conversations with their children. Start early and often! Once is not enough. Check-in with your kids! Once you have had the initial conversation, continue with easy, short check-in’s. Have examples, information and resources available. If your child has experimented, talk about it. Be engaged with your kids, but don’t use anger. Care and concern goes a long way. But NEVER pretend it isnt happening. Face the issue head on.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

That drop in perceived risk — from 50% to 26% — tracks almost exactly with Delaware’s move to decriminalize in 2015 and legalize recreational marijuana in 2023. Legalization for adults was the right call, but we can’t pretend normalization doesn’t reach kids too, and the evidence says prevention has to evolve with it, not just keep repeating old messaging.

I’d support sustained, full funding for DSAMH’s evidence-based prevention framework, strict limits on cannabis marketing and packaging that could appeal to minors, and continued retail compliance checks like those already used for tobacco and vape sales to anyone under 21. And since youth substance use and mental health are deeply linked I’d tie prevention funding directly to expanding school-based mental health support, not just standalone drug education.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

I support a strong evidence based approach to preventing substance abuse among Delaware’s youngest children. I would support expanding prevention education in schools and increasing access to counseling and intervention.

I consider one of the best methods of prevention to be generally increasing the quality of life for working class families. Drugs are often used as a coping mechanism for dealing with an extremely stressful everyday existence. Fair paying jobs, quality education, affordable housing, and ample investment in youth programs will all reduce drug usage.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Because lower perceived risk is one of the strongest predictors of rising use, I’d focus on evidence-based, age appropriate interventions rather than messaging alone.

I’d like to see Delaware revisit raising cigarette and vapor product taxes and closing the gap so that e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches are taxed like tobacco. HB 215 attempted this last session but died without a House floor vote. Price increases are one of the most effective, well-documented tools for reducing youth initiation because teens are more price-sensitive than adult users. With nearly 20% of Delaware high schoolers vaping, I’ll push to bring this back next session.

Beyond pricing, I’d prioritize what the research actually supports: evidence-based school curricula that build refusal and decision-making skills (not scare-tactic assemblies, which don’t work), family-based programs that strengthen parental monitoring and communication, and expanded screening in pediatric primary care to catch early use. I’d also support directing more opioid settlement funds toward youth-specific prevention programming, not just treatment.

Since perceived risk is falling for marijuana use, retailers should face strict age-verification and marketing restrictions keeping cannabis advertising away from youth, similar to alcohol and tobacco rules, paired with public health messaging grounded in accurate, non-exaggerated risk information.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

This was answered below. This organization needs much more support form the public with financing and volunteering,

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Addressing youth substance use requires a comprehensive, evidence-based approach grounded in prevention, education, and early intervention. I support expanding school- and community-based prevention programs that use proven models, such as social-emotional learning and peer-led initiatives, which have been shown to reduce substance use. We must also modernize public health messaging. As perceptions of cannabis risk decline, education should focus on brain development, mental health impacts, and impaired driving, delivered in a way that is credible and age-appropriate.

Increasing access to school-based mental health services is critical, as untreated anxiety and depression are key risk factors for substance use. I also support screening and early intervention programs, including SBIRT (Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment), in schools and primary care settings.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

I think it is important to create opportunities for people to learn and to be educated about what’s out there. With the legalization of marijuana in Delaware and the proliferation of CBD and THC products there is an opportunity to educate about marijuana and other substances. As a former beer brewer and brewery owner education for people at all ages about the dangers of substance abuse, whether it is drugs or alcohol is paramount.

Q6 The Attorney General’s office enforces Delaware’s consumer protection laws, which can apply to false or misleading health-related claims, including in the marketing of dietary supplements and alternative medical products. What approach, if any, would you take to consumer protection enforcement in cases involving unsupported health or scientific claims?

Delaware’s Consumer Fraud Act provides broad consumer protection authority that can be applied in virtually any B2C context when a business engages in unfair or deceptive practices—including, thanks to our office’s advocacy, post-transaction conduct. If purveyors of alternative medical products or supplements commit fraud we will hold them accountable.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Delaware should strengthen youth substance-use prevention by expanding evidence-based school and community programs, such as “Students on a Quest Uniting Against Drugs” or Peer Outreach for Prevention.” Public awareness campaigns can help explain the effects of substance use on adolescent brain development. Schools should also provide mental health screenings and family-focused support, since anxiety, trauma, and other mental health concerns can contribute to substance use.

Stronger enforcement of retail laws, limits on youth-targeted marketing, and better medication disposal options can also reduce access. Education, mental health support, family involvement, and prevention strategies can help Delaware youth make healthier and more informed choices.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Preventing youth substance use requires more than simply telling young people not to use drugs. We need to understand why young people are using substances and invest in prevention strategies that have demonstrated results.

I support age-appropriate, evidence-based education about marijuana, alcohol, tobacco, vaping, opioids, and other substances, including honest information about their effects on adolescent health and development. Delaware should continue using data such as the Delaware School Survey to identify trends and evaluate whether prevention programs are actually working.

Prevention must also include stronger access to school counselors, mental health professionals, mentoring, after-school programs, and early intervention services. Parents and caregivers should be provided with resources to recognize warning signs and have informed conversations with their children.

When a young person is already struggling with substance use, our response should include treatment and support rather than relying solely on punishment. I believe the strongest approach combines education, prevention, family engagement, mental health support, and accountability while continually measuring outcomes and adjusting our strategies based on evidence.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

I know it’s important we recognize youth substance use as a problem of public health and systems, not some individual failing. We need to understand the root causes in our communities and an individual’s life to effectively address each person’s needs. I believe our state can best prevent substance use in kids by funding evidence-based school programs, improving access to youth behavioral healthcare, and offering treatment not punishment.

I would support:

• Funding evidence-based and age-appropriate programs that offer prevention education in all K-12 schools, for all grades.
• Running youth-focused media campaigns highlighting the risks of substance use on developing brains.
• Expanding the use of the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment model, which is mandatory under Medicaid, to all children to regularly screen for behavioral health needs and connect young people to care.
• Addressing shortages of behavioral health providers by funding training, loan forgiveness, and telehealth infrastructure specifically for youth services.
• Ensuring youth struggling with substance abuse problems are given a treatment and support plan, not incarceration.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Reducing youth substance use requires prevention, education, early intervention, and access to support.

I support age-appropriate, evidence-based health education that gives students accurate information about marijuana, opioids, vaping, alcohol, and other substances while building decision-making and coping skills.

Schools should also have stronger access to mental health services, screening, and connections to treatment when a young person is already struggling. Family engagement, mentorship, extracurricular activities, and strong school connectedness are also important protective factors and should be part of Delaware’s prevention strategy.

I support strict enforcement of age restrictions and protections against marketing cannabis, nicotine, or other regulated substances in ways designed to appeal to minors.

Finally, Delaware should continue using the Delaware School Survey and other outcome data to measure which programs actually reduce substance use. Programs that demonstrate results should be expanded; those that do not should be improved or replaced.

The goal should be to prevent substance use, intervene early, and help young people get support when they need it.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Keeping young people safe and healthy is personal to me. I worked in health care at ChristianaCare for years, so I’ve seen firsthand what happens when prevention and mental-health support come too late. The steep decline in how many 11th graders see risk in regular marijuana use, especially now that adult-use cannabis is legal in Delaware, tells us our prevention approach needs to be updated and grounded in evidence. I support school-based prevention that gives students honest, accurate information about the developing brain, paired with the mental-health supports too many of our struggling schools lack. Because substance use so often grows out of stress, trauma, and lack of opportunity, I’d invest in protective factors that research backs: counselors and social workers in schools, after-school and mentoring programs, and family support. I’d sustain prevention funding through the Division of Public Health, put opioid-settlement dollars to work for youth, and enforce firm limits on youth-targeted marketing and underage access to cannabis and vaping. And I’d hold programs accountable by tracking results through tools like the Delaware School Survey and funding what actually works.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Start by addressing the issue within the current system. What is the effectiveness of the youth substance-use prevention programs – does this survey result mean they are not working? Is the 11th graders view of risk more realistic now? There are many dangers, safety issues for teens. This is one question out of context, what about alcohol use? What is the greater context of the youths’ lives?

I look forward to working with the network of scientists to address all the improvements needed in a systematic approach.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

I would support strengthening evidence-based prevention and early intervention programs in Delaware schools and communities, while making sure young people have access to mental health and substance use services when prevention alone is not enough. The decline in the perception that regular marijuana use is risky shows why sustained, age appropriate education is important. Delaware should use the Delaware School Survey and other public health data to identify trends, target resources to communities and populations with higher risk, and evaluate programs based on measurable outcomes. Prevention should address marijuana, nicotine, alcohol, opioids, and other substances, while giving parents, educators, and students practical information about the health, academic, and developmental consequences of substance use.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Substance use among young people can result in serious physical and mental health consequences, negatively impact academic performance, and increase the long-term risk for addiction and overdose. Any approach to addressing this topic must acknowledge that addiction is a complicated issue influenced by many factors, including mental health, trauma, and social determinants of health.

There is no single policy solution that will address this issue. Still, as a state senator, I believe our approach must be guided by the best available scientific evidence and by prevention and treatment strategies with proven effectiveness. I support increasing investment in age-appropriate, evidence-based strategies that help prevent substance use, including prevention and life-skills education in K-12 schools, expanded mental health supports for young people, and increased access to school-based health resources.

Any effective strategy will require collaboration among students, parents, schools, health care providers, and community organizations. Because substance use trends continuously evolve, our prevention and treatment strategies must be regularly informed by data and the experiences of young people and their families. Our goal should be to provide young people with the education and supports they need to make healthy, informed choices while ensuring those facing substance use challenges receive the care they need.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Protecting our children from substance abuse requires a balanced approach centered on prevention, education, treatment, and accountability. The decline in young people’s perception of the risks of regular marijuana use is concerning because research shows early substance use can affect brain development, mental health, and academic success.

I support expanding evidence-based prevention programs in our schools that provide honest, age-appropriate education about the risks of marijuana, opioids, vaping, alcohol, and other drugs. These programs should actively involve parents, educators, healthcare professionals, and community organizations.

We must also increase access to school-based mental health services and counseling. Many young people struggling with substance use are also dealing with anxiety, depression, trauma, or family challenges. Addressing these underlying issues can reduce the likelihood of drug use before it begins.

Law enforcement should continue targeting those who illegally sell drugs to minors and combat the flow of fentanyl into our communities. At the same time, young people with substance use disorders should have timely access to treatment and recovery services.

By combining prevention, mental health support, parental involvement, and targeted enforcement, Delaware can reduce youth substance use and help every child build a healthier, more successful future.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Youth substance-use programs should continue to be funded and continue to emphasize good choices. However, the choices of programs used should be driven by research that shows what works. “Just say No” was once very popular, but was a clear failure. More recently, research by Stanford University’s REACH Lab shows that an effective approach is to both encourage abstention and provide harm reduction education. Young people should be taught about the risks, should be encouraged to abstain, but also should be made aware of how to minimize harm if they or their friends do not abstain. The key is to follow the research and make adjustments in programs as better research gives us a clearer sense of how to address the problem.

The statistic in this question is an example of the challenge. Students may perceive less risk in marijuana for many reasons, including that much more dangerous drugs, including opioids, are readily accessible. This particular statistic doesn’t say they are more likely to use marijuana than in 1999, just that they don’t see it as risky today as youth once did.

A quick search shows that according to the Delaware YRBS, the percentage of high school students using marijuana in the prior 30 days dropped from 29% to 18% between 1999 and 2023. This doesn’t suggest there is no problem, just that we need to understand the importance of interpreting data correctly.

Q6 The Attorney General’s office enforces Delaware’s consumer protection laws, which can apply to false or misleading health-related claims, including in the marketing of dietary supplements and alternative medical products. What approach, if any, would you take to consumer protection enforcement in cases involving unsupported health or scientific claims?

If a health-related claim is misleading and is negatively impacting Delawareans, especially if there is public concern or prior knowledge of harm or potential harm, I will advocate for Delawareans’ rights. I believe that everyone has the right to choose how they care for themselves and I also believe that if a product has been proven to make a false claim, Delawareans should be protected and informed.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Because cannabis was ridiculously caegirized as a schedule 1 drug by the Feds, no research into the effects of cannabis use was funded in the US. Israel, however, has some enlightening data of those who used cannabis and the effects fed to American by these drug czars is mostly fiction. The fata supporting a reduction in the usage is a positive. But, lets be honest, kids will experiment. We need to ensure they are educated with fact based data and not the propaganda that has been spread for decades.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

To address youth substance use and counter the decline in perceived risk, I support modernizing our prevention strategies with evidence-based education. We need robust, peer-reviewed prevention programs in our schools that provide accurate information regarding the physiological impacts of high-potency products, synthetic drugs, and cannabis on developing brains. Furthermore, I support directing state resources to expand youth mental health services, early intervention counseling, and after-school community programs that address the root causes of substance use, ensuring our schools and public health agencies work hand-in-hand to keep students safe.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Protecting Delaware’s youth from substance abuse requires a balanced approach focused on prevention, education, accountability, and access to resources. I support evidence-based prevention programs that provide students with accurate information about the risks of drug and alcohol use, while also strengthening partnerships between schools, families, law enforcement, healthcare providers, and community organizations. We should evaluate programs based on measurable outcomes and invest in approaches that are proven to reduce substance use, not simply increase spending without results. Early intervention, mental health resources, mentoring programs, and support for families are important tools in preventing addiction before it begins. Marijuana and other substance use among youth should not be normalized. Delaware should continue using data to guide policy decisions and ensure we are helping young people make informed choices that protect their health and future.

Q9 Delaware funds youth substance-use prevention programs through the Division of Public Health and the state budget. According to the 2024 Delaware School Survey, 26% of Delaware 11th graders perceive great risk in regular marijuana use, down from 50% in 1999. What evidence-based policies, if any, would you support to address substance use among young people in Delaware and ensure drug usage decline?

Delaware must be honest with young people about the risks of drug use and give parents, teachers, and communities the tools to act early. When fewer students see regular marijuana use as harmful, we cannot respond with silence or slogans.

I support funding prevention programs that have evidence of results, including school based education that teaches students how to handle peer pressure, family programs that help parents have informed conversations, and mentorship and after school opportunities that give young people support and purpose.

Schools should have access to trained counselors and straightforward referral systems so students showing early signs of substance use can get help before a mistake becomes an addiction. Parents must be informed and involved, while student privacy and due process are respected.

I also support clear enforcement against selling or marketing marijuana, vaping products, alcohol, or illegal drugs to minors. Every program receiving taxpayer funding should measure outcomes and prove it is reducing youth drug use.

Our message should be clear: Delaware believes in second chances, but we will do everything possible to prevent a child from needing one.

Q1 As a member of Congress, you would vote on appropriations for federal science agencies, including the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Health. What priorities (if any) would guide your decisions on federal science funding?

I would fund science as public infrastructure: stable, multi-year support for basic and translational research; competitive peer review; public-health, climate, energy, materials, computing, and social science; modern facilities; and a skilled workforce. High-risk work needs time beyond an election calendar; clear criteria, conflict disclosure, audits, and honest negative findings protect public trust.

That judgment is practical. My first classroom assignment was honors and general eighth-grade physical science. At APS, I applied that experience to our America 250 project, America’s Scientific Revolutionaries. I presented its research and public-education work at Science on Tap; its programs have included MIT astrophysicist and exoplanet pioneer Sara Seager and CHOP vaccine scientist Paul Offit. Sustained support becomes discovery, education, and public understanding—not merely a line item.

Geophysicist Marcia McNutt, who led the National Academy of Sciences until earlier this year, described science during her ASR program as how we escape a zero-sum game. Public funding should expand capacity and public return: usable access; responsible technology transfer; broad geographic and institutional opportunity; secure stewardship of sensitive data. AI should expand research capacity, not replace scientific judgment or consume public resources without transparent terms.

Q1 As a member of Congress, you would vote on appropriations for federal science agencies, including the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Health. What priorities (if any) would guide your decisions on federal science funding?

Research and application sciences need to be advanced. But with what money? Real (inflation-adjusted) GDP has been a net zero for 18 years! Hence, the need for my proposed, detailed American Prosperity Plan, which would, I suggest, restore 1950s economic growth which, in turn, would dramatically boost federal revenue. Also, there is the matter of oversight. For instance, the National Nanotechnology Initiative, which drives mRNA developments, should be carefully examined and rigorously harnessed.

Q1 As a member of Congress, you would vote on appropriations for federal science agencies, including the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Health. What priorities (if any) would guide your decisions on federal science funding?

I would be looking at the benefits to society. Will the funding allow for research that would prevent or cure diseases? Would it make healthcare more affordable? Would it be science research that would advance mental health care understanding? Is it something that would advance clean energy? These are some key areas I would be looking to see funding going when approving funds in the US Senate